Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Urquhart, J. Schofield (1972)
MEASURING READERS' FAILURE AT THE SHELF IN THREE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIESJournal of Documentation, 28
D. Urquhart (1954)
FACTS AND FAITHJournal of Documentation, 10
M. Line (1963)
STUDENT ATTITUDES TO THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY: A SECOND SURVEY AT SOUTHAMPTON UNIVERSITYJournal of Documentation, 22
P. Tucker (1961)
THE SOURCES OF BOOKS FOR UNDERGRADUATES: a survey at Leeds University LibraryJournal of Documentation, 17
UGC Working Party on Capital Provision for University Libraries
Capital Provision for University Libraries: Report of a Working Party (The Atkinson Report)
M. Line (1964)
LIBRARIES FOR EXPANDING UNIVERSITIESHigher Education Quarterly, 19
S. Nash, M. Sherwood
The University of Southampton: An Illustrated History
UGC Committee on Libraries
Report of the Committee on Libraries (The Parry Report)
G. Smith, J. Schofield (1971)
Administrative Effectiveness : Times and Costs of Library OperationsJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 3
P. Plumb (1971)
The Cambridge University Library Management Research Unit.
J. Urquhart, J. Schofield (1971)
MEASURING READERS' FAILURE AT THE SHELFJournal of Documentation, 27
A. Oppenheim (1962)
READING HABITS OF STUDENTS: a survey of students at the London School of EconomicsJournal of Documentation, 18
B. Page, P. Tucker (1959)
THE NUFFIELD PILOT SURVEY OF LIBRARY USE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LEEDSJournal of Documentation, 15
M.B. Line
Libraries in institutions of higher education: independence versus interdependence
T. Bowyer (1963)
CONSIDERATIONS ON BOOK PROVISION FOR UNDERGRADUATES IN BRITISH UNIVERSITY LIBRARIESJournal of Documentation, 19
Purpose – To describe the part played by Maurice Line in the use of survey evidence and performance information in the management of academic libraries, commencing with the publication of the “Parry Report” in 1967. Design/methdology/approach – The Parry Committee found little practical evidence in 1963, and had to commission some work. Two studies carried out by Line at Southampton University were available, and this and other work by Line featured significantly in the committee's work. The emergence of Line as a major figure in the development of academic and research libraries, the further development of the use of an evidence‐based approach to the management of academic libraries, and the links between these two factors are outlined. Findings – The advance of Line's professional career was accompanied by a substantial output of highly‐regarded professional writing, which incorporated original thought and an evidence‐based approach to a degree which was unusual for that time, especially from somebody in a relatively junior post. The paucity of similar work prior to 1970 is outlined and the development of the empirical approach, especially through the work of the newly‐founded Library Management Research Unit (LMRU) is described. The 1976 report of the Atkinson Committee is portrayed as confirming the importance of evidence for the future management of academic libraries. Originality/value – Sketches the early stages of a career which has had a profound impact on the development of academic and research libraries since 1960.
Interlending & Document Supply – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2005
Keywords: Libraries; History; Surveys
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.