Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

THE EIGHTEENTHCENTURY PROPRIETARY LIBRARY IN ENGLAND

THE EIGHTEENTHCENTURY PROPRIETARY LIBRARY IN ENGLAND I that phenomenon so familiar to students of eighteenthcentury literature, the circulating library, has endured much comment, a little of it accurate, some of it ambiguous, a great deal of it uninformed. The chief obstacle to a proper appreciation of its influence is the absence of a proper definition of it that given in the Oxford English Dictionary speaks the truth indeed, but not the whole truth, for within the category are to be included at least two major species which differ in toto. The first, the object of Sheridan's familiar but shallow witticism, will not be dealt with here in any detail it was not unlike the modern twopenny library, being a commercial venture dependent on individual management and catering for the immediate wants of a public largely uncritical and in search of passing entertainment. It is rather with the second type, the proprietary library, that this paper is concerned, for although its aims, status, and administration were totally different from those of its humbler if more popular contemporary, this type was, and still is, designated circulating, if the Leeds Library be taken to represent it, as it assuredly does in every way. The relevant nomenclature for eighteenthcentury libraries is, in fact, not a little bewildering to the uninitiated the Leeds Library has been known as circulating, subscription, and even public, while the Birmingham Library indenture of 1799 expressly names the Public Library but the Cambridge University library, for example, was also known as public, like many other essentially private collections, such as those parochial libraries which restricted the use of their treasures to the faithful and gave the parson the key. The distinction insisted on above will be found roughly to correspond with that made by the older local historians, who generally deign to notice, however meagrely, the local proprietary institution, but do not, as a rule, condescend to mention the mere commercial venture, a distinction made so pointed in a judgement of exquisite gentility by the excellent Mr. Horsfield of Lewes, to be quoted hereafter, that it is worthy to become classic. Most of them are mentioned by S. Lewis in his great Topographical dictionary, and they are generally styled subscription libraries. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Documentation Emerald Publishing

THE EIGHTEENTHCENTURY PROPRIETARY LIBRARY IN ENGLAND

BECKWITH, FRANK
Journal of Documentation , Volume 3 (2): 18 – Mar 1, 1947
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-eighteenthcentury-proprietary-library-in-england-v1PZ3gvAXX

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0022-0418
DOI
10.1108/eb026111
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

I that phenomenon so familiar to students of eighteenthcentury literature, the circulating library, has endured much comment, a little of it accurate, some of it ambiguous, a great deal of it uninformed. The chief obstacle to a proper appreciation of its influence is the absence of a proper definition of it that given in the Oxford English Dictionary speaks the truth indeed, but not the whole truth, for within the category are to be included at least two major species which differ in toto. The first, the object of Sheridan's familiar but shallow witticism, will not be dealt with here in any detail it was not unlike the modern twopenny library, being a commercial venture dependent on individual management and catering for the immediate wants of a public largely uncritical and in search of passing entertainment. It is rather with the second type, the proprietary library, that this paper is concerned, for although its aims, status, and administration were totally different from those of its humbler if more popular contemporary, this type was, and still is, designated circulating, if the Leeds Library be taken to represent it, as it assuredly does in every way. The relevant nomenclature for eighteenthcentury libraries is, in fact, not a little bewildering to the uninitiated the Leeds Library has been known as circulating, subscription, and even public, while the Birmingham Library indenture of 1799 expressly names the Public Library but the Cambridge University library, for example, was also known as public, like many other essentially private collections, such as those parochial libraries which restricted the use of their treasures to the faithful and gave the parson the key. The distinction insisted on above will be found roughly to correspond with that made by the older local historians, who generally deign to notice, however meagrely, the local proprietary institution, but do not, as a rule, condescend to mention the mere commercial venture, a distinction made so pointed in a judgement of exquisite gentility by the excellent Mr. Horsfield of Lewes, to be quoted hereafter, that it is worthy to become classic. Most of them are mentioned by S. Lewis in his great Topographical dictionary, and they are generally styled subscription libraries.

Journal

Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 1, 1947

There are no references for this article.