Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Cargile, J. Bradac (2001)
Chapter 10: Attitudes Toward Language: A Review of Speaker-Evaluation Research and a General Process ModelCommunication Yearbook, 25
J. Edwards
Language attitudes and their implications among English applicants
V. Callan, C. Gallois, Paula Forbes (1983)
Evaluative Reactions to Accented EnglishJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14
R. Kalin, D. Rayko, N. Love (1980)
The Perception and Evaluation of Job Candidates with Four Different Ethnic Accents
Diana Wu (1997)
Asian Pacific Americans in the Workplace
F. Crosby, S. Bromley, Leonard Saxe (1980)
Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review.Psychological Bulletin, 87
Allen Huffcutt, J. Conway, P. Roth, N. Stone (2001)
Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 5
E. Stone-Romero, D. Stone (2007)
Cognitive, Affective, and Cultural Influences on Stigmatization: Impact on Human Resource Management Processes and Practices, 26
United States General Accounting Office
Immigration Reform
Sharon Goto, G. Gee, D. Takeuchi (2002)
Strangers still? The experience of discrimination among Chinese AmericansJournal of Community Psychology, 30
Hong‐Wei Wang, B. Kleiner (2001)
New developments concerning nation origin discriminationInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21
Monica Lin, Virginia Kwan, Anna Cheung, S. Fiske (2005)
Stereotype Content Model Explains Prejudice for an Envied Outgroup: Scale of Anti-Asian American StereotypesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31
A. Cargile, H. Giles (1997)
Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identityLanguage & Communication, 17
R. Podberesky, R. Deluty, S. Feldstein
Evaluations of Spanish‐ and Oriental‐accented English applicants
J. Cotton, Bonnie O’Neill, Andrea Griffin (2008)
The “name game”: affective and hiring reactions to first namesJournal of Managerial Psychology, 23
R. Kalin
The social significance of speech in medical, legal and occupational settings
M. Bresnahan, Rie Ohashi, Reiko Nebashi, Wen Liu, Sachiyo Shearman (2002)
Attitudinal and affective response toward accented EnglishLanguage & Communication, 22
J. Fernandez, Mary Barr (1993)
The Diversity Advantage: How American Business Can Out-Perform Japanese and European Companies in the Global Marketplace
Nancy Zerda, R. Hopper (1979)
Employment interviewers' reactions to Mexican American speechCommunication Monographs, 46
J. Quinn, Joseph Petrick (1993)
Emerging Strategic Human Resource Challenges in Managing Accent Discrimination and Ethnic Diversity, 4
Eugene Stone, D. Stone, R. Dipboye (1992)
Stigmas in organizations : race, handicaps, and physical unattractivenessAdvances in psychology, 82
Government Printing Office
Government Printing Office Dictionary of Occupational Titles
Enric Llurda (1983)
Native-speaker Reactions to Nonnative Speech: A ReviewStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 5
Rosita Podberesky, R. Deluty, S. Feldstein (1990)
Evaluations of Spanish- and Oriental-accented English speakersSocial Behavior and Personality, 18
H. Giles, P. Wilson, Anthony Conway (1981)
Accent and lexical diversity as determinants of impression formation and perceived employment suitabilityLanguage Sciences, 3
Tiane Lee, S. Fiske (2006)
Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content ModelInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30
United States Census Bureau
2006 American community survey
E. Ryan, M. Hewstone, H. Giles (1984)
Language and Intergroup Attitudes
Anne Locksley, E. Borgida, N. Brekke, C. Hepburn (1980)
Sex stereotypes and social judgmentJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39
G.C. Parliman, R.J. Shoeman
National origin discrimination or employer prerogative? An analysis of language rights in the workplace
V. Bernstein, M. Hakel, A. Harlan (1975)
The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability?Journal of Applied Psychology, 60
Sharon Purkiss, P. Perrewé, Treena Gillespie, B. Mayes, G. Ferris (2006)
Implicit sources of bias in employment interview judgments and decisionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101
M. Campion, D. Palmer, James Campion (1997)
A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEWPersonnel Psychology, 50
M. Eisenstein
Native reactions to non‐native speech: a review of empirical research
United States Commission on Civil Rights
Civil Rights Issues Facing Asian Americans in 1990s: A report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights
J. Reitz (2001)
Immigrant Success in the Knowledge Economy: Institutional Change and the Immigrant Experience in Canada, 1970–1995Journal of Social Issues, 57
M. Gordon, L. Slade, N. Schmitt (1986)
The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to EmpiricismAcademy of Management Review, 11
Rosina Lippi-Green (1997)
English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States
A.C. Cargile, J.J. Bradac
Attitudes toward language: a review of applicant‐evaluation research and a general process model
Purpose – Although statistical evidence clearly demonstrates discrimination against foreign‐accented individuals in the workplace, surprisingly little research attention has been paid to how such individuals are evaluated when they apply for jobs. Thus, the aim of this paper is to examine the effects of applicant accent on access‐related employment decisions across four jobs that differed on job status and communication demands. Design/methodology/approach – The study used a 3 (applicant accent: Standard American English, French, and Japanese) × 2 (job status: low vs high)×2 (communication demands: low vs high) mixed‐factorial design, and data from 286 college students at two different locations. Findings – Results show that in comparison with French‐accented applicants, Japanese‐accented applicants fared worse on employment‐related decisions, especially for jobs that had high communication demands, even after controlling for applicant understandability and location. French‐accented applicants were viewed as favorably as, or more favorably than, Standard American English‐accented applicants. Research limitations/implications – Applicant accent was confounded with applicant names. Thus, it is not known whether the obtained results are due to applicant accent, names, or both. Practical implications – It was found that organizations could do one of the following: use structured interviews; train interviewers on potential biases against foreign‐accented applicants; and provide more individuating information to reduce the effects of accent‐based stereotypes on employment‐related decisions. Originality/value – The paper considers the communication demands of jobs and job status as influences on the evaluation of foreign‐accented applicants.
Journal of Managerial Psychology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 16, 2010
Keywords: Immigrants; Language; Communication skills; Decision making; Discrimination in employment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.