Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The effects of ethical climate on group and individual level deception in negotiation

The effects of ethical climate on group and individual level deception in negotiation Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of ethical climate on the use of deception during negotiation for both individuals and groups. It aims to focus on the use of “ethical climate” as a shared task representation at the group level. Design/methodology/approach – Participants were 458 undergraduate students who earned course credit. Participants engaged in a simulated negotiation task about the selling/purchase of a new car, via an instant messenger program. Those assigned to the “seller” role either negotiated individually or as a three‐person group, and received one of three ethical climate manipulations (honesty, competitive, or control). The main dependent variable was whether the seller(s) disclosed information about a possible defect. Findings – As predicted, groups were less honest than individuals. Participants in the honesty condition were most likely to be honest while those in the competitive condition were the least likely to be honest, although this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, there was a significant interaction effect between size of negotiating party and ethical climate indicating that groups' “default” response was to lie, but they lied significantly less often in the “honesty” condition. Alternatively, individuals' default response was to be honest. Practical implications – Decision‐making groups have a tendency to compete even if it means being dishonest. However, organizations can help to overcome this tendency by establishing an ethical climate. Originality/value – While there have been studies published on the effects of ethical climate on decision making at the individual level, there is a gap in the literature on these effects at the group level. Decisions are made at the group level too often to not pay attention to these differences. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Conflict Management Emerald Publishing

The effects of ethical climate on group and individual level deception in negotiation

Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-effects-of-ethical-climate-on-group-and-individual-level-deception-H6xWfMiUwb
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1044-4068
DOI
10.1108/10444060910974894
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of ethical climate on the use of deception during negotiation for both individuals and groups. It aims to focus on the use of “ethical climate” as a shared task representation at the group level. Design/methodology/approach – Participants were 458 undergraduate students who earned course credit. Participants engaged in a simulated negotiation task about the selling/purchase of a new car, via an instant messenger program. Those assigned to the “seller” role either negotiated individually or as a three‐person group, and received one of three ethical climate manipulations (honesty, competitive, or control). The main dependent variable was whether the seller(s) disclosed information about a possible defect. Findings – As predicted, groups were less honest than individuals. Participants in the honesty condition were most likely to be honest while those in the competitive condition were the least likely to be honest, although this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, there was a significant interaction effect between size of negotiating party and ethical climate indicating that groups' “default” response was to lie, but they lied significantly less often in the “honesty” condition. Alternatively, individuals' default response was to be honest. Practical implications – Decision‐making groups have a tendency to compete even if it means being dishonest. However, organizations can help to overcome this tendency by establishing an ethical climate. Originality/value – While there have been studies published on the effects of ethical climate on decision making at the individual level, there is a gap in the literature on these effects at the group level. Decisions are made at the group level too often to not pay attention to these differences.

Journal

International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 3, 2009

Keywords: Autonomous work groups; Ethics; Negotiating; Decision making; Behaviour

References

  • Drawing the line: an exploratory test of ethical behavior in negotiations
    Anton, R.
  • The effects of ethical climate and the availability of alternatives on the use of deception during negotiation
    Aquino, K.
  • Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiation: a causal modeling analysis of decision‐aiding effects
    Arunachalum, V.; Dilla, W.N.
  • Social identity theory and the organization
    Ashforth, B.E.; Mael, F.
  • The social psychology of ordinary ethical failures
    Bazerman, M.H.; Banaji, M.R.
  • Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness
    Bies, R.J.; Moag, J.S.
  • Deception and retribution in repeated ultimatum bargaining
    Boles, T.L.; Croson, R.T.A.; Murnighan, J.K.
  • Basking in reflected glory: three football field studies
    Cialdini, R.B.; Borden, R.J.; Thorne, A.; Walker, M.R.; Freeman, S.; Sloan, L.R.
  • An experimental study of credibility in e‐negotiations
    Citera, M.; Beauregard, R.; Mitsuya, T.
  • What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite
    Cohen, S.G.; Bailey, D.E.
  • The measurement of moral judgment
    Colby, A.; Kohlberg, L.
  • Self‐categorization, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity
    Ellemers, N.; Kortekaas, P.; Ouwerkerk, J.W.
  • Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature
    Ford, R.C.; Richardson, W.C.
  • The influences of deception and computer‐mediation on dyadic negotiations
    Giordano, G.A.; Stoner, J.S.; Brouer, R.L.; George, J.F.
  • Why professionals lie: the impact of professional role conflict on reporting accuracy
    Grover, S.
  • The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors
    Hinsz, V.B.; Tindale, R.S.; Vollrath, D.A.
  • Individual‐group discontinuity from the differing perspectives of Campbell's realistic group conflict theory and Tajfel and Turner's social identity theory
    Insko, C.A.; Schopler, J.; Kennedy, J.F.; Dahl, K.R.; Graetz, K.A.; Drigotas, S.M.
  • Flattery may get you somewhere: the strategic implications of providing positive versus negative feedback about ability versus ethicality in negotiation
    Kim, P.H.; Diekmann, K.A.; Tenbrunsel, A.E.
  • Creating High Performance Organizations: Practices and Results of Employees Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 500 Companies
    Lawler, E.E.; Mohrman, S.A.; Ledford, G.E.
  • Negotiation, Second Edition
    Lewicki, R.J.; Litterer, J.; Minton, J.; Saunders, D.
  • Defining business ethics: like nailing jello to a wall
    Lewis, P.V.
  • Group processes in organizational contexts
    McGrath, J.E.; Argote, L.
  • Group vs. individual performance in mixed‐motive situations: exploring an inconsistency
    Morgan, P.M.; Tindale, R.S.
  • A review of the emperical ethical decision making literature: 1996‐2003
    O'Fallon, M.J.; Butterfield, K.D.
  • Methodology in business ethics research: a review and critical assessment
    Randall, D.M.; Gibson, A.M.
  • Organizational Behavior
    Robbins, S.P.; Judge, T.A.
  • Group processes and performance and their effects on individuals' ethical frameworks
    Schminke, M.; Wells, D.
  • The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: generality and mediation
    Schopler, J.; Insko, C.A.
  • When groups are more competitive than individuals: the domain of the discontinuity effect
    Schopler, J.; Insko, C.A.; Wieselquist, J.; Pemberton, M.; Witcher, B.; Kozar, R.; Roddenberry, C.; Widschut, T.
  • Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations
    Sims, R.R.
  • Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups discussing the death penalty: a shared representations interpretation
    Smith, C.M.; Dykema‐ Engblade, A.; Walker, A.; Niven, T.S.; McGrough, T.
  • Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: biased information sampling during discussion
    Stasser, G.; Titus, W.
  • Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision schemes
    Steinel, W.; DeDreu, C.K.W.
  • An integrative theory of intergroup conflict
    Tajfel, H.; Turner, J.C.
  • Social sharedness as a unifying theme for information processing in groups
    Tindale, R.S.; Kameda, T.
  • Shared representations and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups
    Tindale, R.S.; Smith, C.M.; Thomas, L.S.; Filkins, J.; Sheffey, S.
  • Ethical decision making in organizations: a person‐situation interactionist model
    Trevino, L.K.
  • Business ethics: the state of the art
    Werhane, P.H.; Freeman, R.E.