Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Sidel (2013)
Banks mostly avoid providing bitcoin services. Lenders don't share investors' enthusiasm for the Virtual-Currency craze
Paraskevi Katsiampa (2017)
Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH modelsEconomics Letters, 158
Dima Alberg, Haim Shalit, Rami Yosef (2008)
Estimating stock market volatility using asymmetric GARCH modelsApplied Financial Economics, 18
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18
R. Merton (1973)
AN INTERTEMPORAL CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODELEconometrica, 41
S. Stavroyiannis, Vassilios Babalos (2017)
Dynamic Properties of the Bitcoin and the US MarketERN: Time-Series Models (Single) (Topic)
R. Engle (1982)
Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflationEconometrica, 50
Shi Chen, C. Chen, W. Härdle, Tm Lee, Bobby Ong (2016)
A First Econometric Analysis of the CRIX FamilyERN: International Financial Flows (Topic)
(2005)
Exchange Rates and Fundamentals
R. Lumsdaine (1996)
Consistency and Asymptotic Normality of the Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimator in IGARCH(1,1) and Covariance Stationary GARCH(1,1) ModelsEconometrica, 64
V. Cermak (2017)
Can Bitcoin Become a Viable Alternative to Fiat Currencies? An Empirical Analysis of Bitcoin's Volatility Based on a GARCH ModelERN: International Finance (Topic)
Zhuanxin Ding, C. Granger, R. Engle (1993)
A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model
P. Grauwe (1988)
Exchange Rate Variability and the Slowdown in Growth of International Trade, 35
R. Baillie, Tim Bollerslev (1989)
Common Stochastic Trends in a System of Exchange RatesJournal of Finance, 44
B. Mandlebrot (1963)
The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices
K. Banumathy, R. Azhagaiah (2015)
Modelling Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from IndiaManaging global transitions, 13
(2013)
Banks mostly avoid providing bitcoin services
E. Hannan, B. Quinn (1979)
The determination of the order of an autoregressionJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 41
(2017)
Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study, Cambridge Judge Business School
(2010)
Econometric Time Series, (3rd Edition), JohnWiley and Sons Inc, NewYork, NY
(2006)
Introduction to Econometrics, 2nd Edition, Addison Wesley, Boston
(1992)
Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariance
Usman Chohan (2017)
Cryptocurrencies: A Brief Thematic ReviewIRPN: Innovation & Finance (Topic)
(2013)
Four reasons you shouldn‘t buy bitcoins archived 2017-08-23 at the wayback
Daniel Nelson (1991)
CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY IN ASSET RETURNS: A NEW APPROACHEconometrica, 59
A. Dyhrberg (2016)
Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual goldFinance Research Letters, 16
Elie Bouri, Georges Azzi, A. Dyhrberg (2016)
On the return-volatility relationship in the Bitcoin market around the price crash of 2013Economics, 11
O. Wintenberger (2012)
Continuous Invertibility and Stable QML Estimation of the EGARCH(1,1) ModelScandinavian Journal of Statistics, 40
M. Kendall (1953)
The Analysis of Economic Time‐Series—Part I: Prices, 116
N. Antonakakis, N. Antonakakis, Julia Darby (2013)
Forecasting volatility in developing countries’ nominal exchange returnsApplied Financial Economics, 23
C. Moreno (2020)
Análisis comparativo de rentabilidades de un portafolio de inversión valorado con diferentes metodologías
R. Cont (2005)
Volatility Clustering in Financial Markets: Empirical Facts and Agent-Based Models.Capital Markets: Market Microstructure
D. Kliger, BG Malkiel (2007)
Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work
C. Peake (2005)
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and EvidenceCfa Digest, 35
M. Beine, S. Laurent, C. Lecourt (2002)
Accounting for conditional leptokurtosis and closing days effects in FIGARCH models of daily exchange ratesApplied Financial Economics, 12
(2014)
The Bitcoin Bible Gold Edition: All You Need to Know about Bitcoins and More
G. Schwarz (1978)
Estimating the Dimension of a ModelAnnals of Statistics, 6
P. Phillips (1988)
Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression
J. Zakoian (1994)
Threshold heteroskedastic modelsJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18
(2015)
Money is No Object: Understanding the Evolving Cryptocurrency Market
D. Dickey, W. Fuller (1979)
Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit RootJournal of the American Statistical Association, 74
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19
(2014)
Cryptocurrency and global financial security panel at Georgetown diplomacy
R. Engle, David Lilien, Russell Robins (1987)
Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The Arch-M ModelEconometrica, 55
Tim Bollerslev (1987)
A CONDITIONALLY HETEROSKEDASTIC TIME SERIES MODEL FOR SPECULATIVE PRICES AND RATES OF RETURNThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 69
C. Jarque, Anil Bera (1980)
Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residualsEconomics Letters, 6
Bela Gipp, Norman Meuschke, A. Gernandt (2015)
Decentralized Trusted Timestamping using the Crypto Currency BitcoinArXiv, abs/1502.04015
Journal of Monetary Economics, 44
Lezama Palomino, J. Carlos. (2020)
Efecto del mercado de futuros en la volatilidad del mercado SPOT: caso aplicado al mercado accionario colombiano
J. Bardet, Y. Boularouk, K. Djaballah (2016)
Asymptotic behavior of the Laplacian quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of affine causal processesarXiv: Statistics Theory
Jeffrey Chu, S. Chan, S. Nadarajah, Joerg Osterrieder (2017)
GARCH Modelling of Cryptocurrencies, 10
H. Joe, N. Reid, Peter Xuekun, D. Firth (2012)
Composite Likelihood Methods
Joshua Omokehinde, M. Abata, Olukayode Russell, S. Migiro, Christopher Somoye (2017)
Asymmetric Information and Volatility of Stock Returns in NigeriaJournal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 9
Hui Wang, Jiazhu Pan (2014)
Restricted normal mixture QMLE for non-stationary TGARCH(1, 1) modelsScience China Mathematics, 57
Tim Bollerslev (1986)
Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 31
Dumitru Miron, C. Tudor (2010)
Asymmetric Conditional Volatility Models: Empirical Estimation and Comparison of Forecasting AccuracyRomanian Journal of Economic Forecasting
Journal of Empirical Finance, 1
(2006)
Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th Edition, Pearson-Prentice
Andrew Urquhart (2017)
The Volatility of BitcoinSocial Science Research Network
(2013)
Bitcoins Spark Regulatory Crackdown as Denmark Drafts Rules
This paper aims to examine whether the crypto-currencies’ market returns are symmetric or asymmetric informative, through analysing the daily logarithmic returns of bitcoin currency over the period of 2011-2017.Design/methodology/approachIn doing so, the symmetric informative analysis is estimated by applying the generalised auto-regressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) (1,1) model, whereas asymmetric informative or leverage effects analysis is estimated by exponential GARCH (1,1), asymmetric power ARCH (1,1) and threshold GARCH (1,1) models. In addition, the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity in mean (GARCH-M (1,1)) was applied to examine whether the risk-return trade-off phenomenon was persistent in crypto-currencies market.FindingsThe main findings indicate that bitcoin market return or volatility is symmetric informative and has a long memory to persist in the future. Furthermore, the sympatric volatility is found to be more sensitive to its past values (lagged) than to the new shock of the market values. However, asymmetric informative response of volatility to the negative and the positive shocks do not exist in the bitcoin market or, in other words, there is no leverage effect. This suggests that the bitcoin market is in harmony with the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) with respect to the asymmetric information and violated the EMH with regard to the symmetric information. Hence, the market price or return of bitcoin currency could not be predicted by simply exercising such past market information in the short-run investment. In addition, the estimated coefficient of conditional variance or risk premium (λ) in the mean equation of CHARCH–M (1,1) model is positive however, statistically insignificant. This indicates the absence of risk-return trade-off, in which case the higher market risk will not essentially lead to higher market returns. This paper has proposed that an investment in the crypto-currency market is more appropriate for risk-averse investors than risk takers.Originality/valueThe findings of the study will provide investors with necessary information about the bitcoin market price efficiency, hedging effectiveness and risk management.
Journal of Financial Economic Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 6, 2019
Keywords: Market efficiency; Forecasting; Monetary systems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.