Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Lawrence Abbott, Susan Parker, Gary Peters, K. Raghunandan (2003)
The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit FeesEar and Hearing, 22
J. Reynolds, Jere Francis (2000)
Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisionsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 30
Journal of Financial Economics, 99
D. Hay (2006)
Audit Fees: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand AttributesContemporary Accounting Research, 23
Journal of Financial Economics, 102
H. Skaife, D. Collins, William Jr., Ryan LaFond (2007)
The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual QualityLSN: Corporate Governance U.S. (Topic)
R. Watts (2003)
Conservatism in Accounting - Part I: Explanations and ImplicationsAuditing
Accounting Horizons, 17
R. Lalonde (1984)
Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental DataThe American Economic Review, 76
Santanu Mitra, Mahmud Hossain, D. Deis (2007)
The empirical relationship between ownership characteristics and audit feesReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28
A. Craswell, Jere Francis, Stephen Taylor (1995)
Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializationsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 20
Chris Hogan, Michael Wilkins (2008)
Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies?Contemporary Accounting Research, 25
Journal of Political Economy, 98
Journal of Finance, 48
Terry Warfield, J. Wild, Kenneth Wild (1995)
Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 20
J. Doyle, Weili Ge, Sarah McVay (2006)
Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial ReportingRoss: Accounting (Topic)
Rani Hoitash, Udi Hoitash, J. Bedard (2008)
INTERNAL CONTROL QUALITY AND AUDIT PRICING UNDER THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTEar and Hearing, 27
Ryan LaFond, Sugata Roychowdhury (2007)
Managerial Ownership and Accounting ConservatismIO: Firm Structure
Beng Goh, Dan Li (2011)
Internal Controls and Conditional ConservatismThe Accounting Review, 86
J. Bedard, Karla Zehms (2004)
Earnings Manipulation Risk, Corporate Governance Risk, and Auditors' Planning and Pricing DecisionsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Vishal Munsif, K. Raghunandan, D. Rama, M. Singhvi (2011)
Audit Fees after Remediation of Internal Control WeaknessesAccounting Horizons, 25
Richard Frankel, Marilyn Johnson, Karen Nelson (2002)
The Relation between Auditors' Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings ManagementThe Accounting Review, 77
H. Huang, R. Parker, Yun-Chia Yan, Y. Lin (2014)
CEO Turnover and Audit PricingAccounting Horizons, 28
The Accounting Review, 82
Michael Ettredge, Chan Li, Lili Sun (2006)
The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX EraEar and Hearing, 25
C. Lennox, Jere Francis, Zi-Tian Wang (2012)
Selection models in accounting researchThe Accounting Review, 87
J. Krishnan, D. Rama, Yinghong Zhang (2008)
Costs to Comply with SOX Section 404Ear and Hearing, 27
D. Simunic (1980)
The Pricing Of Audit Services - Theory And EvidenceJournal of Accounting Research, 18
Q. Cheng, Terry Warfield, Minlei Ye (2004)
Equity Incentives and Earnings ManagementJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26
K. Raghunandan, D. Rama (2006)
SOX Section 404 Material Weakness Disclosures and Audit FeesEar and Hearing, 25
The Accounting Review, 83
Ryan LaFond, Sugata Roychowdhury (2008)
Managerial Ownership and Accounting Conservatism: conservatism and ownershipJournal of Accounting Research, 46
(2009)
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Kevin Murphy, M. Jensen (1990)
Performance Pay and Top Management IncentivesLabor: Personnel Economics
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15
Journal of Financial Economics, 64
M. Jensen (1993)
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsCGA: Governance & Internal Control Systems (Topic)
The Accounting Review, 80
Joseph Carcello, D. Hermanson, T. Neal, Richard Riley (2000)
Board Characteristics and Audit FeesSEIN Corporate Governance & Accountability eJournal
E. Kim, Yao Lu (2011)
CEO Ownership, External Governance, and Risk-takingSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
A. Craswell, Jere Francis (1999)
Pricing Initial Audit Engagements: A Test of Competing TheoriesThe Accounting Review, 74
J. Doyle, Weili Ge, Sarah McVay (2007)
Accruals Quality and Internal Control Over Financial ReportingCorporate Finance: Governance
C. Himmelberg, R. Hubbard, Darius Palia, Anup Agrawal, George Baker, Sudipto Bhattacharya, Steve Bond, Charles Calomiris, Harold Demsetz, Rob Hansen, Laurie Hodrick, Randy Kroszner, Mark Mitchell, Andrew Samwick, Bill Schwert, Scott Stern, Rob Vishny, Karen Wruck, Darius Palia (1999)
Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and the Link Between Ownership and PerformanceJournal of Financial Economics, 53
J. Jiambalvo (1996)
Discussion of “Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC”*Contemporary Accounting Research, 13
Contemporary Accounting Research, 19
The Accounting Review, 83
J. Krishnan, Jayanth Krishnan, Hakjoon Song (2011)
The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit FeesAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 30
G. Gotti, Sam Han, J. Higgs, Tony Kang (2012)
Managerial Stock Ownership, Analyst Coverage, and Audit FeeJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 27
Jacqueline Hammersley, Linda Myers, Jian Zhou (2012)
The Failure to Remediate Previously-Disclosed Material Weaknesses in Internal ControlsAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 31
S. Thompson (2009)
Simple Formulas for Standard Errors that Cluster by Both Firm and TimeCorporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies
Ryan LaFond, R. Watts (2007)
The Information Role of ConservatismCorporate Law: Securities Law eJournal
T. Bell, W. Landsman, Douglas Shackelford (2001)
Auditors' Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and EvidenceJournal of Accounting Research, 39
J. Core, D. Larcker (2000)
Performance Consequences of Mandatory Increases in Executive Stock OwnershipCorporate Finance: Governance
PurposeThe purpose of the study is to examine the effect of managerial stock ownership on the relationship between material internal control weaknesses (ICW) and audit fees.Design/methodology/approachThe paper uses multivariate regression analyses on a sample of 1,578 ICW and 1,578 pair-matched (based on both propensity score and managerial stock ownership) non-ICW firm observations for a period from 2004 to 2010 to investigate how managerial incentive at various stock ownership levels impacts the relationship between material ICW and audit fees.FindingsFor the firms with low managerial stock ownership (up to 5 per cent stockholdings), the authors find no significant effect of managerial ownership on the positive relationship between audit fees and ICW. However, the impact of managerial stock ownership on the relationship between ICW and audit fees is significantly positive when managerial ownership is medium, i.e. more than 5 per cent and less than or equal to 25 per cent stockholdings, and the managerial ownership effect is even higher when managerial stock ownership is high, i.e. more than 25 per cent stockholdings. The result is especially robust for the ICW firms with high managerial stock ownership (i.e. where managers hold more than 25 per cent equity stake in the firms). The additional analyses further show that this managerial ownership effect is more pronounced when the firms suffer from company-level material control weaknesses that have pervasive negative effect on financial reporting quality.Research limitations/implicationsThe results imply that in a low managerial ownership firms with substantial misalignment between manager and shareholder incentives, managerial stock ownership has little effect on the ICW and audit fee relationship. But when managers’ ownership interest is at a high level, they are more prone to purchase higher-quality audit service to reduce the risk of financial misstatements due to material ICW, which results in higher audit fees. The results add to the audit fee literature by suggesting that managerial incentive at various ownership levels is a critical governance factor that impacts auditor’s fee structure especially when higher reporting risk exists due to material ICW.Originality/valuePrior literature documents that there is some relationship between managerial attributes and earnings quality; however, there is no substantive empirical evidence on the effect of managerial stock ownership on audit pricing when client companies face higher risk of financial misreporting as a result of material ICW. In this study, the authors seek answers to these empirical questions and fill the gap in the literature.
Review of Accounting and Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 8, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.