Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Arieh Ullmann (1985)
Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. FirmsAcademy of Management Review, 10
Jerald Greenberg (1990)
Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and TomorrowJournal of Management, 16
Marshall Schminke, Maureen Ambrose, Terry Noel (1997)
The Effect of Ethical Frameworks on Perceptions of Organizational JusticeAcademy of Management Journal, 40
S. Vitell, D. Davis (1990)
Ethical beliefs of MIS professionals: The frequency and opportunity for unethical behaviorJournal of Business Ethics, 9
J. Dutton, J. Dukerich (1991)
Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational AdaptationAcademy of Management Journal, 34
L. Treviño, S. Youngblood (1990)
Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
D. Ones, C. Viswesvaran, F. Schmidt (1993)
Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78
Surveys 200 Malaysian students at a US midwestern university to investigate attitudes towards corporate social responsibility. Refers to previous studies exploring the link between corporate social responsibility and financial performance but asserts that there is little empirical evidence on corporate social responsibility and employee attitudes – hence this study. Describes how the survey was carried out (a questionnaire measured on a four‐point Likert scale). Uses t‐tests to evaluate the data. Aims particularly to establish whether or not individuals who value corporate social responsibility exhibit less tolerance of 17 identified counter productive behaviours (such as using organizational services for personal use, padding expense accounts and pilfering organizational supplies). Finds support for the notion that individuals who value corporate social responsibility rate the 17 behaviours as more unethical than individuals who do not especially value corporate social responsibility. Indicates, therefore, that these (more ethical) individuals are less likely to indulge in counter productive behaviour. Recommends ways to back up and extend this research.
Cross Cultural Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1998
Keywords: Employee attitudes; Ethics; Social responsibility
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.