The effect of acquisition decision making on security posture

The effect of acquisition decision making on security posture Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of decision making in IT acquisition and security, and the disparity between the two domains. The paper postulates that improving decision processes during acquisition increases decision makers' security consciousness and security posture. Design/methodology/approach – Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 15 IT decision makers of small‐to‐medium sized organizations using questions derived from previous research in psychology, HCI, and MIS. Questions from the security and acquisition areas were coded based upon a predefined rubric and correlation testing was performed. The author chose to focus on small‐to‐medium sized organizations since they often lack sufficient background and resources to address IT security concerns. Findings – Analysis suggests a significant positive correlation between the effectiveness of acquisition decision making and organizational security posture and attitudes, further suggesting that small improvements in acquisition decision making may result in substantial improvements in an organization's security posture. Research limitations/implications – The sample size of 15 organizations is not sufficient for population generalization. This research instead focused on analyzing the effect of certain decisions, attitudes, and behaviours on acquisition and security. Originality/value – Increased security concerns, such as cyber‐attacks and regulation, require organizations to proactively plan for and address security requirements. Tools/software are insufficient to properly address organizational security and do not address failure or flaws in human decision making. These findings can help organizations to better understand and improve their internal decision making processes and security consciousness, and avoid common pitfalls which allow for unaddressed risk. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Information Management & Computer Security Emerald Publishing

The effect of acquisition decision making on security posture

Information Management & Computer Security, Volume 20 (5): 14 – Nov 23, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-effect-of-acquisition-decision-making-on-security-posture-bZ0rt5M0dS
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0968-5227
DOI
10.1108/09685221211286520
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of decision making in IT acquisition and security, and the disparity between the two domains. The paper postulates that improving decision processes during acquisition increases decision makers' security consciousness and security posture. Design/methodology/approach – Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 15 IT decision makers of small‐to‐medium sized organizations using questions derived from previous research in psychology, HCI, and MIS. Questions from the security and acquisition areas were coded based upon a predefined rubric and correlation testing was performed. The author chose to focus on small‐to‐medium sized organizations since they often lack sufficient background and resources to address IT security concerns. Findings – Analysis suggests a significant positive correlation between the effectiveness of acquisition decision making and organizational security posture and attitudes, further suggesting that small improvements in acquisition decision making may result in substantial improvements in an organization's security posture. Research limitations/implications – The sample size of 15 organizations is not sufficient for population generalization. This research instead focused on analyzing the effect of certain decisions, attitudes, and behaviours on acquisition and security. Originality/value – Increased security concerns, such as cyber‐attacks and regulation, require organizations to proactively plan for and address security requirements. Tools/software are insufficient to properly address organizational security and do not address failure or flaws in human decision making. These findings can help organizations to better understand and improve their internal decision making processes and security consciousness, and avoid common pitfalls which allow for unaddressed risk.

Journal

Information Management & Computer SecurityEmerald Publishing

Published: Nov 23, 2012

Keywords: Organizational security; Business practices; Acquisition; SDLC; Decision making; Information technology

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off