Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jerry Strawser (1994)
An Investigation of the Effect of Accountant Involvement with Forecasts on the Decisions and Perceptions of Commercial LendersJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 9
M.C Jensen, W.H. Meckling
Theory of a firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure
F. Black (1976)
The Dividend Puzzle, 2
C.M Pillsbury
Limited assurance engagements
ICAEW
Response to “Accounting and Audit Requirements of Small Firms”
Brenda Porter, J. Simon, D. Hatherly (1997)
Principles of External Auditing
D. McFadden (1972)
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
M. Page (1997)
The auditor and the smaller company
H. Theil (1971)
Principles of econometrics
Clifford Smith, Jerold Warner (1979)
On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenantsJournal of Financial Economics, 7
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
R. Eisenbeis (1977)
PITFALLS IN THE APPLICATION OF DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS IN BUSINESS, FINANCE, AND ECONOMICSJournal of Finance, 32
J. Gentry, R. Moyer, James McGuigan, W. Kretlow (1981)
Contemporary Financial Management
S. Fearnley, M. Page
Audit regulation one year on
S Fearnley, M Page
Counting the cost of audit regulation
C. Pratten
The Uses of Small and |Medium‐sized Companies and the Effects of the Auditing Exemption Regime
David Blackwell, Thomas Noland, Drew Winters (1998)
The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricingJournal of Accounting Research, 36
R. Hagerman, M. Zmijewski (1979)
Some economic determinants of accounting policy choiceJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1
B. Tabachnick, L. Fidell (1983)
Using Multivariate Statistics
C.W Chow
The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences
E. Fama (1980)
Agency Problems and the Theory of the FirmJournal of Political Economy, 88
R. Watts (1977)
Corporate Financial Statements, A Product of the Market and Political ProcessesAustralian Journal of Management, 2
Small companies with a turnover of up to £90,000 have been exempted from a compulsory audit since 1994. This paper is an investigation of why some small companies chose to continue with the audit whilst others abandoned it. The basic hypothesis of the paper is that a major reason why some small companies continue to be audited is to help control the conflict of interests among managers, shareholders, and outside creditors. Based on this analysis, the probability that a company will be audited voluntarily are predicted to increase as company size and gearing ratio increase, and to decrease as managerial share ownership and liquidity ratios increase. Univariate and multivariate tests were applied to the data of 92 small independent companies randomly selected from the Companies House CD-ROM database. The results from the two tests support the hypothesised effects of managerial share ownership, company size (turnover), and gearing ratio. There is no support for the company size (total assets) and liquidity ratio effects.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2000
Keywords: Gearing and liquidity; External auditing; Shareholders; Small firms
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.