Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Fung, L. Su, X. Zhu (2010)
Price divergence from fundamental value and the value relevance of accounting informationContemporary Accounting Research, 27
D. Collins, Edward Maydew, Ira Weiss (1997)
Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty yearsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 24
Dan Givoly, Carla Hayn (2000)
The Changing Time-Series Properties of Earnings, Cash Flows and Accruals: Has Financial Reporting Become More Conservative?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29
Robert Holthausen, R. Watts (2000)
The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard SettingCorporate Finance and Organizations eJournal
Zhaoyang Gu (2007)
Across-Sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over TimeSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Stephen Brown, Kin Lo, Thomas Lys (1998)
Use of R-Squared in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance Over the Last Four DecadesFinancial Accounting
Myungsun Kim, William Kross (2005)
The Ability of Earnings to Predict Future Operating Cash Flows Has Been Increasing Not DecreasingCorporate Finance: Valuation
Stephen Ryan, Paul Zarowin (2003)
Why Has the Contemporaneous Linear Returns‐Earnings Relation Declined?The Accounting Review, 78
Patricia Dechow, S. Kothari, R. Watts, W. Simon (1998)
The Relation Between Earnings and Cash FlowsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 25
Von Harris (1994)
THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF GERMAN ACCOUNTING MEASURES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSISJournal of Accounting Research, 32
D. Donelson, R. Jennings, John McInnis (2011)
Changes Over Time in the Revenue-Expense Relation: Accounting or Economics?The Accounting Review, 86
A. Dontoh, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Ronen (2000)
The Declining Value Relevance of Accounting Information and Non-Information-Based Trading: An Empirical AnalysisS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
S. Balachandran, Partha Mohanram (2011)
Is the decline in the value relevance of accounting driven by increased conservatism?Review of Accounting Studies, 16
Mary Barth, Donald Cram, Karen Nelson (1999)
Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash FlowsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Ilia Dichev, Vicki Tang (2008)
Matching and the Changing Properties of Accounting Earnings over the Last 40 YearsThe Accounting Review, 83
A. Dontoh, S. Radhakrishnan, J. Ronen (2007)
Is stock price a good measure for assessing value-relevance of earnings? An empirical testReview of Managerial Science, 1
J. Francis, K. Schipper (1999)
Have financial statements lost their relevanceJournal of Accounting Research, 37
B. Lev, Paul Zarowin (1999)
The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend themJournal of Accounting Research, 37
R. Ball, Scott Keating, C. Leuz, Gerhard Mueller, C. Nobes (1999)
The Effect of International Institutional Factors on Properties of Accounting EarningsS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
P. Pope, M. Walker (1999)
International Differences in the Timeliness, Conservatism and Classification of EarningsSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Kin Lo, Thomas Lys (2000)
The Ohlson Model: Contribution to Valuation Theory, Limitations, and Empirical ApplicationsJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15
Purpose – This paper aims to identify what drives the temporal reduction in the value relevance of earnings documented in the literature. Is it the increasing noise in stock returns over time, noise in earnings, or both? Design/methodology/approach – The authors develop hypotheses from the lead/lag structure between stock returns and accounting earnings and perform empirical tests using data from annual COMPUSTAT and monthly CRSP over the sample period of 39 years (1970‐2008). Findings – The test results show that increasing noise in stock returns over time is primarily responsible for the temporal reduction of R 2 in regressions of returns on earnings. Additional analysis shows weak evidence that both the noise in returns and the noise in earnings are responsible for the declining association between earnings and returns in a sub‐period (1970‐1982). Research limitations/implications – The R 2 ‐based methodology has limitations because, as Gu points out, regression R 2 s might be incomparable across samples. The findings suggest that future research should control for the effects of the temporal increase in market noise before making value relevance inferences from the declining association between earnings and returns. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the limited body of research on noise in stock returns as the main driver for the temporal reduction in value relevance of earnings.
Management Research Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 19, 2011
Keywords: Value relevance; Noise in returns; Noise in earnings; Stock returns; Accounting research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.