Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

The Contemporary Scene

The Contemporary Scene I SUPPOSE the question uppermost in the mind of a reader seriously considering the state of fiction at the present time must inevitably be where are the successors to the thrones at present filled by the older writers One by one the old school are passing from our midst. Have we, among the younger writers, any qualified to occupy their positions, to inherit their prestige and authority The names of Mr. Walpole and Mr. Priestley immediately spring to mind. They have reputations. They write abundantly. They are talked about. Their work sells. They are the typical traditionalists of modern letters, the inheritors of a long and fairly continuous tradition of technique and subject matter. They are craftsmanly novelists. They are stylists in their way. They are quiet, urbane, efficient and conscientious. Neither possesses any profound depth of feeling. Neither possesses, as yet, that infallible instinct for character by which, and by which alone as Arnold Bennett insisted a novel can reach greatness. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Library Review Emerald Publishing

The Contemporary Scene

Library Review , Volume 4 (1): 4 – Jan 1, 1933

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-contemporary-scene-028DWW1G1R
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0024-2535
DOI
10.1108/eb011960
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

I SUPPOSE the question uppermost in the mind of a reader seriously considering the state of fiction at the present time must inevitably be where are the successors to the thrones at present filled by the older writers One by one the old school are passing from our midst. Have we, among the younger writers, any qualified to occupy their positions, to inherit their prestige and authority The names of Mr. Walpole and Mr. Priestley immediately spring to mind. They have reputations. They write abundantly. They are talked about. Their work sells. They are the typical traditionalists of modern letters, the inheritors of a long and fairly continuous tradition of technique and subject matter. They are craftsmanly novelists. They are stylists in their way. They are quiet, urbane, efficient and conscientious. Neither possesses any profound depth of feeling. Neither possesses, as yet, that infallible instinct for character by which, and by which alone as Arnold Bennett insisted a novel can reach greatness.

Journal

Library ReviewEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 1933

There are no references for this article.