Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The community-level impact of a family justice center: indicators from the Guilford County Family Justice Center

The community-level impact of a family justice center: indicators from the Guilford County Family... The purpose of this paper is to describe the ongoing data and evaluation strategies being used to document the impact of the Guilford County Family Justice Center, which has been in operation for nearly four years.Design/methodology/approachThere are four primary ongoing data and evaluation strategies used to tell the story of the impact of the family justice center (FJC) on the community: tracking services provided by the FJC, collecting annual data from partner agencies, conducting week-long censuses and doing an annual survey of professionals affiliated with the FJC and its partner organizations. (The current paper reports on the first three of these strategies.)FindingsMethodological limitations of the evaluation strategies used warrant caution in interpreting the findings of the ongoing evaluation of the Guilford County FJC. However, preliminary evaluation findings indicate support for the center’s positive impact on the community it serves, including in the number of clients served, a reduction in domestic violence-related homicide rates and the creation of new community resources that emerged through the FJC partnership.Research limitations/implicationsEach of the evaluation strategies used in this study holds inherent strengths and limitations, which are discussed in the paper. Beyond the future evaluation of local FJCs, a range of rigorous methodologies can be used to further explore the impact of the FJC model. Qualitative methods may be useful for gaining an in-depth understanding of victims’ and survivors’ perceptions of accessing resources through an FJC, as well as for studying beliefs and attitudes toward FJCs among various community stakeholders. Quantitative methods can be used to apply more complex statistical analyses to comparing indicators of the impact of FJCs over time.Practical implicationsThe data and evaluation findings from the Guilford County FJC add support to the potential positive impact of the FJC model on communities. These preliminary data suggest that FJCs can impact communities by offering support to victims and coordinating resources among partner organizations. Collaborative partnerships can be leveraged to lead to broader community changes that strengthen community-level responses to interpersonal violence through greater community awareness, opportunities for community members to contribute to solutions and the establishment of new resources that emerge from needs identified through the partnership.Social implicationsOverall, there is a pressing need for research examining various aspects of the FJC model and identifying factors that contribute to its success at fostering collaboration, supporting victims and survivors, holding offenders accountable and preventing future violence. With the rapid growth of the FJC models, the need for research and evaluation to document the effectiveness and limitations of the model is high.Originality/valueDesigned to serve as a one-stop shop for victims of domestic violence and other forms of violence to seek help, FJCs offer, within a single location, multiple services from a variety of professional disciplines. These services include law enforcement, victim advocacy and prosecution. Although the FJC model is expanding rapidly across the USA and internationally, research to date is limited, and thus, the current paper will add to the research and evaluation basis for the FJC movement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research Emerald Publishing

The community-level impact of a family justice center: indicators from the Guilford County Family Justice Center

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-community-level-impact-of-a-family-justice-center-indicators-from-TRGC7ioV1y
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1759-6599
DOI
10.1108/jacpr-10-2019-0444
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe the ongoing data and evaluation strategies being used to document the impact of the Guilford County Family Justice Center, which has been in operation for nearly four years.Design/methodology/approachThere are four primary ongoing data and evaluation strategies used to tell the story of the impact of the family justice center (FJC) on the community: tracking services provided by the FJC, collecting annual data from partner agencies, conducting week-long censuses and doing an annual survey of professionals affiliated with the FJC and its partner organizations. (The current paper reports on the first three of these strategies.)FindingsMethodological limitations of the evaluation strategies used warrant caution in interpreting the findings of the ongoing evaluation of the Guilford County FJC. However, preliminary evaluation findings indicate support for the center’s positive impact on the community it serves, including in the number of clients served, a reduction in domestic violence-related homicide rates and the creation of new community resources that emerged through the FJC partnership.Research limitations/implicationsEach of the evaluation strategies used in this study holds inherent strengths and limitations, which are discussed in the paper. Beyond the future evaluation of local FJCs, a range of rigorous methodologies can be used to further explore the impact of the FJC model. Qualitative methods may be useful for gaining an in-depth understanding of victims’ and survivors’ perceptions of accessing resources through an FJC, as well as for studying beliefs and attitudes toward FJCs among various community stakeholders. Quantitative methods can be used to apply more complex statistical analyses to comparing indicators of the impact of FJCs over time.Practical implicationsThe data and evaluation findings from the Guilford County FJC add support to the potential positive impact of the FJC model on communities. These preliminary data suggest that FJCs can impact communities by offering support to victims and coordinating resources among partner organizations. Collaborative partnerships can be leveraged to lead to broader community changes that strengthen community-level responses to interpersonal violence through greater community awareness, opportunities for community members to contribute to solutions and the establishment of new resources that emerge from needs identified through the partnership.Social implicationsOverall, there is a pressing need for research examining various aspects of the FJC model and identifying factors that contribute to its success at fostering collaboration, supporting victims and survivors, holding offenders accountable and preventing future violence. With the rapid growth of the FJC models, the need for research and evaluation to document the effectiveness and limitations of the model is high.Originality/valueDesigned to serve as a one-stop shop for victims of domestic violence and other forms of violence to seek help, FJCs offer, within a single location, multiple services from a variety of professional disciplines. These services include law enforcement, victim advocacy and prosecution. Although the FJC model is expanding rapidly across the USA and internationally, research to date is limited, and thus, the current paper will add to the research and evaluation basis for the FJC movement.

Journal

Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 4, 2020

Keywords: Domestic violence; Interpersonal violence; Community interventions; Coordinated community responses; Family justice center; Family violence

References

  • Environmental scan of family justice centers, final report
  • Council-based approaches to intimate partner violence: evidence for distal change in the system response
    Allen, N.E.; Todd, N.R.; Anderson, C.J.; Davis, S.M.; Javdani, S.; Bruehler, V.; Dorsey, H.
  • A qualitative study of the activities and outcomes of domestic violence coordinating councils
    Allen, N.E.; Watt, K.A.; Hess, J.Z.
  • Growth and development trends
  • Demographics
  • Severe and less severe intimate partner violence: from characterization to prediction
    Cunha, O.S.; Goncalves, R.A.
  • Statewide family justice initiative
  • Final evaluation results: phase II California family justice initiative statewide evaluation
  • About family justice centers
  • Affiliated centers
  • Nampa family justice center process and outcome evaluation
    Giacomazzi, A.; Bostaph, L.
  • Survivor defined success, hope and well-being: an assessment of the impact of family justice centers
    Hellman, C.M.; Aceves, Y.
  • Family justice centers: a model for empowerment?
    Hoyle, C.; Palmer, N.
  • Proximal outcomes matter: a multilevel examination of the processes by which coordinating councils produce change
    Javdani, S.; Allen, N.E.
  • Issues in community-based research and program evaluation
    McCall, R.B.; Green, B.L.; Strauss, M.S.; Groark, C.J.; Damon, W.; Sigel, I.E.; Renninger, K.A.
  • Supporting family justice centers through research and evaluation
    Murray, C.E.; Johnson, C.H.; Geffner, R.; Vieth, V.; Vaughan-Eden, V.; Rosenbaum, A.; Hamberger, L.; White, J.
  • Professionals’ perceptions of the impact of a family justice center: a four-year, cross-sectional study
    Murray, C.E.; Johnson, C.H.
  • A community considers a family justice center: perspectives of stakeholders during the early phases of development
    Murray, C.E.; White, J.W.; Nemati, H.; Chow, A.S.; Marsh, A.C.; Edwards, S.
  • 2017 Certified county population estimates - ranked by population size
  • Chapter 50B; domestic violence
  • Hope lives here: impact of the family peace center
    Schubert, E.
  • Coordinated community response components for victims of intimate partner violence: a review of the literature
    Shorey, R.C.; Tirone, V.; Stuart, G.L.
  • Enhancing the impact of family justice centers via motivational interviewing: an integrated review
    Simmons, C.A.; Howell, K.H.; Duke, M.R.; Beck, J.G.
  • The president’s family justice center initiative: best practices
  • A multi-level analysis of community coordinating councils
    Allen, N.E.