Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The colony writes back: nationalism and collaborative coloniality in the Ip Man series

The colony writes back: nationalism and collaborative coloniality in the Ip Man series PurposeThe majority of Hong Kong filmmakers have pursued co-production with China filmmakers for having the Mainland market at the expense of local styles and sensitivities. To many critics, the two-part series of Ip Man and Ip Man II provide a paradigmatic case of film co-production that sell the tricks of Chinese kung fu, regurgitating the overblown Chinese nationalism against Japanese and kwai-lo. The purpose of this study is to rectify such observation of the Ip Man series.Design/methodology/approachThe authors read the series deconstructively as a postcolonial text in which Hong Kong identity is inscribed in the negotiated space in between different versions of Chinese nationalism.FindingsThe analysis points to the varying subversive features in the series from which Hong Kong’s colonial experiences are tacitly displayed, endorsed and rewritten into the Chinese nationalistic discourse whose dominance is questioned, if not debased.Originality/valueThis paper advances new research insights into the postcolonial reinvention of kung fu film and, by implication, the Hong Kong cinema in general. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Social Transformations in Chinese Societies Emerald Publishing

The colony writes back: nationalism and collaborative coloniality in the Ip Man series

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-colony-writes-back-nationalism-and-collaborative-coloniality-in-QEwl3LJydz

References (22)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1871-2673
DOI
10.1108/STICS-04-2017-0007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe majority of Hong Kong filmmakers have pursued co-production with China filmmakers for having the Mainland market at the expense of local styles and sensitivities. To many critics, the two-part series of Ip Man and Ip Man II provide a paradigmatic case of film co-production that sell the tricks of Chinese kung fu, regurgitating the overblown Chinese nationalism against Japanese and kwai-lo. The purpose of this study is to rectify such observation of the Ip Man series.Design/methodology/approachThe authors read the series deconstructively as a postcolonial text in which Hong Kong identity is inscribed in the negotiated space in between different versions of Chinese nationalism.FindingsThe analysis points to the varying subversive features in the series from which Hong Kong’s colonial experiences are tacitly displayed, endorsed and rewritten into the Chinese nationalistic discourse whose dominance is questioned, if not debased.Originality/valueThis paper advances new research insights into the postcolonial reinvention of kung fu film and, by implication, the Hong Kong cinema in general.

Journal

Social Transformations in Chinese SocietiesEmerald Publishing

Published: Sep 5, 2017

There are no references for this article.