Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sylvia James, S. Singer (2016)
From the NSF: The National Science Foundation’s Investments in Broadening Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education through Research and Capacity BuildingCBE Life Sciences Education, 15
(1999)
National Science Foundation merit review
S. Rosser (2004)
Using POWRE to ADVANCE: Institutional Barriers Identified by Women Scientists and EngineersNWSA Journal, 16
Sharon Bird (2011)
Unsettling Universities' Incongruous, Gendered Bureaucratic Structures: A Case-study ApproachGender, Work and Organization, 18
M. Fox (2008)
Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering
Y. Wang, A. Ellinger (2008)
Organizational learning and innovation performance: a review of the literature of a conceptual framework and research hypothesis
Sumi Cho, K. Crenshaw, L. McCall (2013)
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and PraxisSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38
Virginia Valian (1998)
Why so slow? : the advancement of womenContemporary Sociology, 28
T.M. Cottom (2017)
The intersectional presidency
(n.d.)
ADVANCE at a glance
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
S. Rosser (2017)
Academic Women in STEM Faculty
S.L. Laursen, A.E. Austin (2014)
StratEGIC Toolkit: strategies for effecting gender equity and institutional change
C. Lyall, A. Bruce, W. Marsden, Laura Meagher (2013)
The role of funding agencies in creating interdisciplinary knowledgeScience and Public Policy, 40
M. Ong, Carol Wright, Lorelle Espinosa, G. Orfield (2011)
Inside the Double Bind: A Synthesis of Empirical Research on Undergraduate and Graduate Women of Color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and MathematicsHarvard Educational Review, 81
C. Argyris (1996)
Double Loop Learning in Organizations
S. Rosser (2010)
Building Two-Way Streets to Implement -Policies that Work for Gender and Science
Phech Colatat (2015)
An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPAResearch Policy, 44
H. Hsieh, S. Shannon (2005)
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 15
K. Welde, A. Stepnick (2014)
Disrupting the Culture of Silence: Confronting Gender Inequality and Making Change in Higher Education.
(2011)
The glass obstacle course: formal and informal barriers for STEM PhD students
(2001)
ADVANCE, Increasing the participation and advancement of women in academic science and engineering careers
(2013)
Assessing the academic work environment for science and engineering tenured/tenure-track faculty at the University of Michigan in 2001, 2006, and 2012: gender and race in department- and university-related climate factors
Joan Acker (1990)
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:Gender & Society, 4
Diana Bilimoria, Simy Joy, X. Liang (2008)
Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineeringHuman Resource Management, 47
Roxanne Hughes (2011)
Are the Predictors of Women’s Persistence in STEM Painting the Full Picture? A Series of Comparative Case StudiesInternational Journal of Gender, Science, and Technology, 3
S. Rosser, J. Chameau (2006)
Institutionalization, Sustainability, and Repeatability of ADVANCE for Institutional TransformationThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 31
J. McClellan, Stephen Williams, S. Deetz (2011)
Different Ways of Talking About Intervention Goals
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
M. Easterby-Smith, Luis Araujo (1999)
Organizational learning: current debates and opportunities
S. Ceci, W. Williams (2011)
Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108
Joan Acker (1998)
The Future of ‘Gender and Organizations’: Connections and BoundariesGender, Work and Organization, 5
France Cordova (2016)
Intentional equityScience, 353
B. Scott (2011)
Organizational learning: a literature review
S. Laursen, Ann Austin, Melissa Soto, Dalinda Martinez (2015)
ADVANCing the Agenda for Gender EquityChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47
M. Crossan, H. Lane, Roderick White (1999)
An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to InstitutionAcademy of Management Review, 24
Mary Armstrong, Jasna Jovanovic (2017)
The intersectional matrix: Rethinking institutional change for URM women in STEM.Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10
Shauna Morimoto, A. Zajicek, V. Hunt, Rodica Lisnic (2013)
Beyond Binders Full of Women: NSF ADVANCE and Initiatives for Institutional TransformationSociological Spectrum, 33
(2008)
Broadening participation at the National Science Foundation: a framework for action
The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolving theories of change of the US National Science Foundation’s (NSF) ADVANCE program to increase the representation of women on academic faculties in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). ADVANCE supports efforts to transform the cultures and structures of US institutions of higher education by removing gendered barriers to STEM faculty women’s employment, advancement and success, and by developing change strategies that others may adopt.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study is based on qualitative, longitudinal analysis of nine requests for proposals (RfPs) for the ADVANCE program (2001–2016), complemented by historical analysis of funded ADVANCE projects using public records.FindingsThe analysis identifies changes over time that suggest shifts in NSF’s rationale and theory of change for ADVANCE. Increased guidance directs how institutions should best undertake change, document outcomes and share best practices. The RfPs reveal growing attention to equity, rather than simply to representation, and to intersectionality – how gender, race, social class and other identities intersect to produce disparate experiences and outcomes for individuals differently positioned in social systems. Gendered organizations theory helps to place these experiences and outcomes in a structural context. Iterative processes of organizational learning are postulated to account for these changes over time.Originality/valueWhile many studies have examined ADVANCE projects’ activities and outcomes, none have examined the premises and design of the ADVANCE program itself. This analysis offers insight into how the ADVANCE RfP has driven innovation and learning about transformative institutional change to advance gender equity in STEM.
Equality Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 26, 2019
Keywords: Organizational learning; Intersectionality; Gender equity; Gendered organizations; Theory of change; Institutional transformation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.