Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research

The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of mixed methods research across several business and management fields and to gauge the level of acceptance of mixed methods within these fields. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology employed for this study involved synthesizing the findings from six large‐scale methodological scans of business and management discipline journals in seven fields: marketing, international business, strategic management, organizational behaviour, operations management, entrepreneurship and human resource management. Findings – The study finds that quantitative studies dominate all seven fields (76 per cent of empirical articles) followed by mixed methods (14 per cent of empirical articles) and qualitative studies (10 per cent of empirical articles). In applying the framework for acceptance levels, it would seem there exists minimal acceptance of mixed methods across these fields. Research limitations/implications – The study has limitations related to the coverage of different disciplines and differences in sample sets. More extensive research is planned for the future and will involve an expanded mixed method prevalence rate study across additional business and management fields. Practical implications – The growing use of mixed methods has practical implications for research training and capacity building within business schools. The study points to the need to develop research capacity through the introduction of postgraduate courses in mixed methods and advanced research skills training for existing researchers. Originality/value – Mixed methods is a relatively new and emerging methodological movement. This paper attempts to gauge the use and level of acceptance of mixed methods across a diverse range of business and management discipline areas. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Organizational Analysis Emerald Publishing

The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-acceptance-of-mixed-methods-in-business-and-management-research-q80y7T6WEp
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1934-8835
DOI
10.1108/19348831111149204
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of mixed methods research across several business and management fields and to gauge the level of acceptance of mixed methods within these fields. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology employed for this study involved synthesizing the findings from six large‐scale methodological scans of business and management discipline journals in seven fields: marketing, international business, strategic management, organizational behaviour, operations management, entrepreneurship and human resource management. Findings – The study finds that quantitative studies dominate all seven fields (76 per cent of empirical articles) followed by mixed methods (14 per cent of empirical articles) and qualitative studies (10 per cent of empirical articles). In applying the framework for acceptance levels, it would seem there exists minimal acceptance of mixed methods across these fields. Research limitations/implications – The study has limitations related to the coverage of different disciplines and differences in sample sets. More extensive research is planned for the future and will involve an expanded mixed method prevalence rate study across additional business and management fields. Practical implications – The growing use of mixed methods has practical implications for research training and capacity building within business schools. The study points to the need to develop research capacity through the introduction of postgraduate courses in mixed methods and advanced research skills training for existing researchers. Originality/value – Mixed methods is a relatively new and emerging methodological movement. This paper attempts to gauge the use and level of acceptance of mixed methods across a diverse range of business and management discipline areas.

Journal

International Journal of Organizational Analysis – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 26, 2011

Keywords: Mixed methods research; Organizational research; Management research; Qualitative research; Quantitative research

References

  • A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates methodological approaches across the social/behavioural sciences
    Alise, M.A.; Teddlie, C.
  • Mixed Methods Research for Nursing and Health Sciences
    Andrew, S.; Halcomb, E.
  • Mixed methods in management research
    Bazeley, P.
  • Advances in Mixed Methods Research
    Bergman, M.
  • Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research?
    Bryman, A.
  • Mixed methods in management research: has the phoenix landed?
    Cameron, R.
  • Changing the paradigm‐emerging research designs in professional doctorates
    Cameron, R.
  • A study of the use of mixed methods in management and organisational research journals: justification and design
    Cameron, R.
  • Mixed methods in business and management: a call to the ‘first generation’
    Cameron, R.
  • An empirical study of the use of mixed methods in Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) curriculum within an Australian university
    Cameron, R.; Miller, P.
  • Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Missed Method Approaches
    Creswell, J.W.
  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
    Creswell, J.W.; Plano Clark, V.L.
  • Research methods in management and organisational research: toward integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques
    Currall, S.C.; Towler, A.J.
  • A cartography of qualitative research in Switzerland
    Eberle, T.; Elliker, F.
  • Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry
    Greene, J.
  • Advances in Mixed‐method Evaluation: The Challenges and Benefits of Integrating Diverse Paradigms
  • Toward a conceptual framework for mixed‐method evaluation designs
    Greene, J.; Caracelli, V.; Graham, W.D.
  • Qualitative and quantitative research published in the International Journal of Human Resource Management
    Grimmer, M.; Hanson, D.
  • The mix of qualitative and quantitative research in major marketing journals
    Hanson, D.; Grimmer, M.
  • Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology
    Hanson, W.; Creswell, J.; Plano Clark, V.; Petska, K.; Creswell, J.
  • Mixed methods in international business research: a value‐added perspective
    Hurmerinta‐Peltomaki, L.; Nummela, N.