Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Testing a methodology to improve organizational learning about crisis communication by public organizations

Testing a methodology to improve organizational learning about crisis communication by public... Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test a measurement system with performance indicators to improve organizational learning about crisis communication by public organizations enhancing public safety in large scale emergencies. The tool can be used to conduct a preparedness audit or to evaluate communication performance in a real situation or in an emergency exercise. Evaluation is part of the strategic planning and development of crisis communication. Design/methodology/approach – The construction of the instrument and its theoretical underpinnings are first explained, after which the series of empirical tests that were implemented to scrutinize the clarity and appropriateness of the indicators as well as the usability of the instrument are presented. The process approach to crisis management, in which the various phases of a crisis are seen as a continuum, and the stakeholder perspective, in which both the diversity of public groups and the network of response organizations are taken into account, are applied in the paper. Findings – The tests of the instrument revealed much interest in its use, and it was seen as a potential tool for the improvement by public organizations of their crisis communication. The tests led to improvements in the structure as well as in the phrasing of the individual performance indicators and their explanation. The indicators were considered relevant and important but too many in number. Therefore, a possibility to use the instrument in three separate parts, relating respectively to the period before, during and after a crisis, should be offered. Research limitations/implications – This study addresses the main factors relevant for crisis communication with respect to the approach chosen, but does not report all the literature and empirical findings that validate the individual indicators as this has been done in other publications. It also presents a series of first test findings but not as yet the results of improvements initiated by using the instrument. Practical implications – The instrument developed shows weak and strong points in crisis communication on the level of single indicators, but also allows comparison of performance in different phases and for the various stakeholder groups, showing where more attention is needed. The instrument developed will be available on an open web site and users will be asked to make the measurement results, rendered anonymous, available for its further improvement. Social implications – The paper contributes to effectiveness of emergency management by testing an instrument to facilitate learning about crisis communication. Originality/value – Much of the crisis communication literature focuses on reputation crises. This paper discusses crisis communication supporting crisis management in the case of disasters and other emergencies that are handled by a response network instead a single organization. It provides a clear framework for analysing and assessing the quality of crisis communication and stimulates and thus enables learning and further improvement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Communication Management Emerald Publishing

Testing a methodology to improve organizational learning about crisis communication by public organizations

Paulina Palttala; Marita Vos
Journal of Communication Management , Volume 15 (4): 18 – Nov 15, 2011
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/testing-a-methodology-to-improve-organizational-learning-about-crisis-kZhmvGN2m7
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1363-254X
DOI
10.1108/13632541111183370
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test a measurement system with performance indicators to improve organizational learning about crisis communication by public organizations enhancing public safety in large scale emergencies. The tool can be used to conduct a preparedness audit or to evaluate communication performance in a real situation or in an emergency exercise. Evaluation is part of the strategic planning and development of crisis communication. Design/methodology/approach – The construction of the instrument and its theoretical underpinnings are first explained, after which the series of empirical tests that were implemented to scrutinize the clarity and appropriateness of the indicators as well as the usability of the instrument are presented. The process approach to crisis management, in which the various phases of a crisis are seen as a continuum, and the stakeholder perspective, in which both the diversity of public groups and the network of response organizations are taken into account, are applied in the paper. Findings – The tests of the instrument revealed much interest in its use, and it was seen as a potential tool for the improvement by public organizations of their crisis communication. The tests led to improvements in the structure as well as in the phrasing of the individual performance indicators and their explanation. The indicators were considered relevant and important but too many in number. Therefore, a possibility to use the instrument in three separate parts, relating respectively to the period before, during and after a crisis, should be offered. Research limitations/implications – This study addresses the main factors relevant for crisis communication with respect to the approach chosen, but does not report all the literature and empirical findings that validate the individual indicators as this has been done in other publications. It also presents a series of first test findings but not as yet the results of improvements initiated by using the instrument. Practical implications – The instrument developed shows weak and strong points in crisis communication on the level of single indicators, but also allows comparison of performance in different phases and for the various stakeholder groups, showing where more attention is needed. The instrument developed will be available on an open web site and users will be asked to make the measurement results, rendered anonymous, available for its further improvement. Social implications – The paper contributes to effectiveness of emergency management by testing an instrument to facilitate learning about crisis communication. Originality/value – Much of the crisis communication literature focuses on reputation crises. This paper discusses crisis communication supporting crisis management in the case of disasters and other emergencies that are handled by a response network instead a single organization. It provides a clear framework for analysing and assessing the quality of crisis communication and stimulates and thus enables learning and further improvement.

Journal

Journal of Communication Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 15, 2011

Keywords: Crisis communication; Disaster management; Performance indicators; Quality control; Emergency communication; Organizational performance; Communication management

References

  • Towards a system‐oriented framework for analysing and evaluating emergency response
    Abrahamsson, M.; Hassel, H.; Tehler, H.
  • Doelmatig organiseren
    Alblas, G.; Van de Vliert, E.
  • Corporate governance in the context of crises: towards a stakeholder theory of crisis management
    Alpaslan, Z.; Green, A.; Mitroff, I.
  • Disasters, lessons learned, and fantasy documents
    Birkland, T.
  • Preparing for the future: critical challenges in crisis management
    Boin, A.; Lagadec, P.
  • Organizational theory and the stages of risk communication
    Chess, C.
  • The proactive powers of crisis response strategies: managing reputational assets during a crisis
    Coombs, W.T.
  • Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding
    Coombs, W.T.
  • The failure of organizational learning from crisis – a matter of life and death
    Elliott, D.
  • Action, not talk: a simulation of risk communication during the first hours of a pandemic
    Freimuth, V.; Hilyard, K.; Barge, J.K.B.; Sokler, L.
  • Cultural experience in crisis communication planning
    Harro‐Loit, H.; Vihalemm, T.; Ugur, K.
  • Die Communication Scorecard; eine neue methode des Kommunikationsmanagements
    Hering, R.; Schuppener, B.; Sommerhalder, M.
  • Performance measurement at Nordic companies
    Kald, M.; Nilsson, F.
  • The Strategy‐focused Organization
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets
    Kaplan, R.; Norton, D.
  • Communication gaps in disaster management: perceptions of experts from governmental and non‐governmental organisations
    Palttala, P.; Boano, C.; Lund, R.; Vos, M.
  • Balanced scorecard for natural disaster management projects
    Moe, T.; Gehbauer, F.; Senitz, S.; Mueller, M.
  • The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?
    Mooraj, S.; Oyon, D.; Hostettler, D.
  • From intercrisis to intracrisis learning
    Moynihan, D.
  • Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model
    Reynolds, B.; Seeger, M.
  • Exploring media relations between spokespersons and journalists during crises
    Reich, Z.
  • Best practices in crisis communication: theory and praxis
    Reich, Z.; Korbas‐Magal, D.
  • Best practices in crisis communication: an expert panel process
    Seeger, M.
  • Estonian uppoaminen 1994
    Toivonen, A.
  • Effective Crisis Communication. Moving from Crisis to Opportunity
    Ulmer, R.; Sellnow, T.; Seeger, M.
  • Response patterns to warning messages among citizens
    Vihalemm, T.; Kiisel, M.; Harro‐Loit, H.
  • Communication quality and added value: a measurement instrument for municipalities
    Vos, M.
  • A developmental approach to performance measures: results from a longitudinal study
    Wouters, M.
  • The corporate communication scorecard: a framework for managing and evaluating communication strategies
    Zerfass, A.