Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Parveen Gupta, M. Dirsmith, T. Fogarty (1994)
Coordination and Control in a Government Agency: Contingency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on GAO AuditsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
J. Hackman, R. Walton, P. Goodman (1986)
Leading groups in organizations
V. Nieva, E. Fleishman, Angela Rieck (1985)
Team Dimensions: Their Identity, Their Measurement and Their Relationships
F. David, J. Pearce, W. Randolph (1989)
Linking technology and structure to enhance group performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
D.M. Schweiger, W.R. Sandberg, J.W. Ragan
Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: a comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus techniques of strategic decision making
J. Tata, Sameer Prasad (2004)
Team Self-Management, Organizational Structure, and Judgments of Team EffectivenessJournal of Managerial Issues, 16
S. Shiflett (1979)
Toward a general model of small group productivity.Psychological Bulletin, 86
J. Hackman, J. Lorsch (1987)
The design of work teams
T. Simons (1995)
TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CONSENSUS, HETEROGENEITY, AND DEBATE AS CONTINGENT PREDICTORS OF COMPANY PERFORMANCE: THE COMPLIMENTARITY OF GROUP STRUCTURE AND PROCESS., 1995
J. Mathieu, L. Gilson, T. Ruddy (2006)
Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 1
G. Shea, R. Guzzo
Group effectiveness: what really matters?
Timothy Baldwin, Michael Bedell, Jonathan Johnson (1997)
The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 40
K. Eisenhardt, C. Schoonhoven (1990)
Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
K. Jehn (1994)
ENHANCING EFFECTIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF VALUE‐BASED INTRAGROUP CONFLICTInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 5
Marilyn Gist (1987)
Self-Efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementAcademy of Management Review, 12
D. Schweiger, William Sandberg, James Ragan (1986)
Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and ConsensusAcademy of Management Journal, 29
R. Wageman (1995)
Interdependence and Group EffectivenessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
A. Drach‐Zahavy, A. Somech (2002)
Team heterogeneity and its relationship with team support and team effectivenessJournal of Educational Administration, 40
C. Gibson (1999)
Do they do what they Believe they can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and CulturesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
S. Cohen, Gerald Ledford, G. Spreitzer (1996)
A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team EffectivenessHuman Relations, 49
D. Feltz, C. Lirgg (1998)
Perceived team and player efficacy in hockey.The Journal of applied psychology, 83 4
Steve Alper, D. Tjosvold, K. Law (1998)
Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 74 1
L. Pelled (1996)
Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process TheoryOrganization Science, 7
B. Janz, J. Colquitt, R. Noe (1997)
KNOWLEDGE WORKER TEAM EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF AUTONOMY, INTERDEPENDENCE, TEAM DEVELOPMENT, AND CONTEXTUAL SUPPORT VARIABLESPersonnel Psychology, 50
S. Cohen, D. Bailey (1997)
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive SuiteJournal of Management, 23
V. Sessa, J. Bennett, C. Birdsall (1993)
Conflict with less distress: promoting team effectiveness.Nursing administration quarterly, 18 1
Onne Janssen, Even Vliert, Christian Veenstra (1999)
How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management TeamsJournal of Management, 25
L. Fry, J. Slocum (1984)
Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency ModelAcademy of Management Journal, 27
C. Gibson, Mary Zellmer-Bruhn, D. Schwab (2003)
Team Effectiveness in Multinational OrganizationsGroup & Organization Management, 28
L. Pelled (1996)
RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY AND PERCEPTIONS OF GROUP CONFLICT AND PERFORMANCE: A FIELD INVESTIGATIONInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 7
G. Stewart, M. Barrick (2000)
Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task TypeAcademy of Management Journal, 43
E. Sundstrom, K. Meuse, D. Futrell (1990)
Work teams: Applications and effectiveness.American Psychologist, 45
W.E. Watson, K. Kumar, L.K. Michaelsen
Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups
C. Pearce, C. Gallagher, Michael Ensley (2002)
Confidence at the group level of analysis: A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between potency and team effectivenessJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75
T. Doolen, M. Hacker, E. Aken (2003)
The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: a study of production teamIEEE Trans. Engineering Management, 50
K. Jehn (1995)
A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup ConflictAdministrative Science Quarterly, 40
Richard Priem, D. Harrison, N. Muir (1995)
Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision MakingJournal of Management, 21
J. Henderson, Soonchul Lee (1992)
Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories PerspectiveManagement Science, 38
R. Liden, Sandy Wayne, Lisa Bradway (1997)
Task Interdependence as a Moderator of the Relation Between Group Control and PerformanceHuman Relations, 50
D. Gladstein (1984)
Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 29
T. Porter, B. Lilly (1996)
THE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT, TRUST, AND TASK COMMITMENT ON PROJECT TEAM PERFORMANCEInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 7
Frances Milliken, D. Vollrath (1991)
Strategic Decision-Making Tasks and Group Effectiveness: Insights from Theory and Research on Small Group PerformanceHuman Relations, 44
S. Cohen, Lei Chang, Gerald Ledford (1997)
A HIERARCHICAL CONSTRUCT OF SELF‐MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO QUALITY OF WORK LIFE AND PERCEIVED WORK GROUP EFFECTIVENESSPersonnel Psychology, 50
R. Cosier, D. Dalton (1990)
POSITIVE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT: A FIELD ASSESSMENTInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 1
T. Rickards, Ming Chen, S. Moger (2001)
Development of a Self‐Report Instrument for Exploring Team Factor, Leadership and Performance RelationshipsBritish Journal of Management, 12
J. Bunderson, K. Sutcliffe, Joseph Banas, Bill Bottom, K. Dirks, G. Northcraft, Melissa Thomas-Hunt, S. Louis, John Olin (2002)
Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance EffectsAcademy of Management Journal, 45
Richard Priem, K. Price (1991)
Process and Outcome Expectations for the Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Techniques of Strategic Decision MakingGroup & Organization Management, 16
K. Jehn, Clint Chadwick, S. Thatcher (1997)
TO AGREE OR NOT TO AGREE: THE EFFECTS OF VALUE CONGRUENCE, INDIVIDUAL DEMOGRAPHIC DISSIMILARITY, AND CONFLICT ON WORKGROUP OUTCOMESInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 8
D. Rousseau
Issues of level in organizational research
M. Campion, Gina Medsker, A. Higgs (1993)
RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPSPersonnel Psychology, 46
Catherine Kirchmeyer, A. Cohen (1992)
Multicultural GroupsGroup & Organization Management, 17
Paul Tesluk, J. Mathieu, S. Zaccaro, M. Marks (1997)
Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance.
Ken Smith, Ken Smith, Judy Olian, H. Sims, Douglas O'Bannon, J. Scully (1994)
Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and CommunicationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 39
J. Haleblian, S. Finkelstein (1993)
Top Management Team Size, CEO Dominance, and firm Performance: The Moderating Roles of Environmental Turbulence and DiscretionAcademy of Management Journal, 36
Allen Amason (1996)
Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management TeamsAcademy of Management Journal, 39
V. Sessa (1996)
Using Perspective Taking to Manage Conflict and Affect in TeamsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32
S. Cohen, Gerald Ledford (1994)
The Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams: A Quasi-ExperimentHuman Relations, 47
D. Dunphy, B. Bryant (1996)
Teams: Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance?Human Relations, 49
Harvey Kolodny, M. Kiggundu (1980)
Towards the Development of a Sociotechnical Systems Model in Woodlands Mechanical HarvestingHuman Relations, 33
Allen Amason, D. Schweiger (1994)
RESOLVING THE PARADOX OF CONFLICT, STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCEInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 5
A. Edmondson, M. Roberto, M. Watkins (2003)
A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streamsLeadership Quarterly, 14
S. Finkelstein, D. Hambrick (1990)
Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
L. Pelled, K. Eisenhardt, K. Xin (1999)
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and PerformanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
S.H. Appelbaum, F. Gonzalo
Effectiveness and dynamics of cross‐functional teams: a case study of Northerntranspo Ltd
Bradley Kirkman, Paul Tesluk, B. Rosen (2001)
ASSESSING THE INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF TEAM CONSENSUS RATINGS OVER AGGREGATION OF INDIVIDUAL‐LEVEL DATA IN PREDICTING TEAM EFFECTIVENESSPersonnel Psychology, 54
C. Kirchmeyer, A. Cohen
Multicultural groups: their performance and reactions with constructive conflict
A. Jong, K. Ruyter, Martin Wetzels (2005)
Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service TeamsManag. Sci., 51
P. Earley (1999)
Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 80 3
D. Hyatt, T. Ruddy (1997)
AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE: ONCE MORE INTO THE BREECHPersonnel Psychology, 50
Mark Pagell, Jeffrey LePine (2002)
Multiple case studies of team effectiveness in manufacturing organizationsJournal of Operations Management, 20
M. Wiersema, Karen Bantel (1993)
Top management team turnover as an adaptation mechanism: The role of the environmentSouthern Medical Journal, 14
A. Murray (1989)
Top management group heterogeneity and firm performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 10
P. Goodman (1999)
Designing effective work groups
Warren Watson, Kamalesh Kumar, L. Michaelsen (1993)
Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver
M. Campion, E. Papper, Gina Medsker (1996)
RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSIONPersonnel Psychology, 49
I. Steiner (1972)
Group process and productivity
Richard Hackman, C. Morris (1975)
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integrationAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8
Donice Knight, C. Pearce, Ken Smith, Judy Olian, H. Sims, Ken Smith, P. Flood (1999)
Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensusStrategic Management Journal, 20
C. Gibson, M. Zellmer‐Bruhn, D. Schwab
Team effectiveness in multinational organizations: evaluation across contexts
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review the research on organizational teams. The aim is delimiting the conceptual space of effectiveness and determining team‐level measurement issues. Design/methodology/approach – A range of published works, which analyse the different variables of effectiveness for each type of team, is reviewed (the most used effectiveness criteria are shown in a table). According to the existence of different types of teams – work team, parallel team, project team and management team – the authors assess what variables and measures are more appropriate according to team type, analyse the problems in gathering data and measuring in this level of analysis and, finally, offer a proposal of measurement issues for future research. Findings – The authors conclude that effectiveness is a multidimensional concept with three dimensions: performance, attitudinal outcomes, and behavioural outcomes. Regarding team‐level measurement issues, the authors also conclude that there is a need to use multiple data sources and multimethod analyses incorporating consensus and aggregation methods, as well as observation and key informants. Practical implications – The results of this work can support future research on teams. Although considerable headway has been made in the team effectiveness studies, there are things that still need to be done. The paper shows that a more complete measure of effectiveness must be developed, according to the three dimensions: performance, attitudinal outcomes, and behavioural outcomes. Originality/value – The paper is a comprehensive review and provides a basis for researchers in the area of effective teams.
Team Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 7, 2008
Keywords: Team working; Measurement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.