Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R.T. Mowday
Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations
Jeffrey Dyer, Harbir Singh (1998)
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive AdvantageAcademy of Management Review, 23
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
P. Goodman, Abraham Friedman (1971)
An Examination of Adams' Theory of InequityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 16
Shuba Srinivasan, Dominique Hanssens (2008)
Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future DirectionsJournal of Marketing Research, 46
P. Ring, A. Ven (1994)
Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational RelationshipsAcademy of Management Review, 19
G. Chow (1960)
Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions (econometrics voi 28
Scott MacKenzie, P. Podsakoff, Cheryl Jarvis (2005)
The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 4
H3 . Perceptions of receiving positive tangible inequity from recent project collaborations relates negatively to the company’s willingness to collaborate on future projects
Stephan Wagner, Christiane Rau, E. Lindemann (2010)
Multiple Informant Methodology: A Critical Review and RecommendationsSociological Methods & Research, 38
G. Rose (1971)
The Structure of OrganizationsSocial Service Review
C. Terwiesch, C. Loch (1999)
Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development ActivitiesManagement Science, 45
James Anderson (1995)
Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessmentJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23
Andreas Eggert, Wolfgang Ulaga, Sabine Hollmann (2009)
Benchmarking the impact of customer share in key‐supplier relationshipsJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24
Chanchai Tangpong, Young Ro (2009)
The role of agent negotiation behaviors in buyer-supplier relationshipsJournal of Managerial Issues, 21
R. Baxter, S. Matear (2004)
Measuring intangible value in business to business buyer-seller relationships: an intellectual capital perspective
S. Vargo, R. Lusch (2004)
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for MarketingJournal of Marketing, 68
J. Hair (2010)
Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective
Stephan Wagner, Andreas Eggert, E. Lindemann (2010)
Creating and appropriating value in collaborative relationshipsJournal of Business Research, 63
Sandy Jap (2001)
“Pie Sharing” in Complex Collaboration ContextsJournal of Marketing Research, 38
R. Cosier, D. Dalton (1983)
Equity Theory and Time: A ReformulationAcademy of Management Review, 8
Stephan Wagner, R. Kemmerling (2010)
HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN LOGISTICS RESEARCHJournal of Business Logistics, 31
J. Adams, W. Rosenbaum (1962)
The relationship of worker productivity to cognitive dissonance about wage inequities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 46
E. Donnerstein, E. Hatfield (1982)
Aggression and Inequity
J. González‐Benito (2007)
A theory of purchasing's contribution to business performanceJournal of Operations Management, 25
Eric Fang, Robert Palmatier, K. Evans (2008)
Influence of customer participation on creating and sharing of new product valueJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36
E. Walster, G. Walster, J. Traupmann (1978)
Equity and premarital sex.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36
(1961)
Some effects on productivity of justified and unjustified levels of reward under public and private conditions
Adam Kowol (2008)
The theory of cognitive dissonance By
C. Fornell, D. Larcker (1981)
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research, 18
Shankar Ganesan (1994)
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships:Journal of Marketing, 58
(1994)
Psychometric Theory , 3rd ed.
Karen Hegtvedt (1990)
The effects of relationship structure on emotional responses to inequitySocial Psychology Quarterly, 53
D. Gerbing, James Anderson (1988)
An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its AssessmentJournal of Marketing Research, 25
J. Hair (1972)
Multivariate data analysisInternational Statistical Review, 40
N. Hummon, P. Blau, R. Schoenherr (1971)
The Structure of Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
B. Fynes, S. Búrca, D. Marshall (2004)
Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performanceJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10
William Austin, E. Walster (1975)
Equity With The World: The Trans-Relational Effects of Equity and Inequity*, 38
Stephan Wagner, L. Coley, E. Lindemann (2011)
EFFECTS OF SUPPLIERS' REPUTATION ON THE FUTURE OF BUYER-SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS: THE MEDIATING ROLES OF OUTCOME FAIRNESS AND TRUSTJournal of Supply Chain Management, 47
M. Deutsch (1975)
Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31
E. Hatfield, G. Walster, Ellen Berscheid, William Austin, J. Traupmann, Mary Utne (1978)
Equity: Theory and Research
D. Griffith, Michael Harvey, R. Lusch (2006)
Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justiceJournal of Operations Management, 24
Cynthia Cann (1998)
Eight steps to building a business‐to‐business relationshipJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 13
Daekwan Kim, Erin Cavusgil (2009)
The impact of supply chain integration on brand equityJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24
J. Adams (1963)
TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY.Journal of abnormal psychology, 67
K. Blois (2004)
Analyzing exchanges through the use of value equationsJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19
Xiaowen Huang, M. Kristal, R. Schroeder (2008)
Linking learning and effective process implementation to mass customization capabilityJournal of Operations Management, 26
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
L. Festinger
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
D. Corsten, Nirmalya Kumar (2005)
Do Suppliers Benefit from Collaborative Relationships with Large Retailers? An Empirical Investigation of Efficient Consumer Response AdoptionJournal of Marketing, 69
P. Ekeh, G. Homans (1975)
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms.Contemporary Sociology, 5
Stephan Wagner, E. Lindemann (2008)
Determinants of value sharing in channel relationshipsJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23
Adams Js (1963)
Towards an understanding of inequityThe Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67
Wolfgang Ulaga, Andreas Eggert (2006)
Value-Based Differentiation in Business Relationships: Gaining and Sustaining Key Supplier StatusJournal of Marketing, 70
Rodney Cate, S. Lloyd, June Henton, J. Larson (1982)
Fairness and Reward Level as Predictors of Relationship SatisfactionSocial Psychology Quarterly, 45
L. Scheer, Nirmalya Kumar, J. Steenkamp (2003)
Reactions to Perceived Inequity in U.S. and Dutch Interorganizational RelationshipsAcademy of Management Journal, 46
P.Y. Redondo, J.J.C. Fierro
Importance of company size in long‐term relationships
Yolanda Redondo, J. Fierro (2007)
Importance of company size in long‐term orientation of supply function: an empirical researchJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 22
G.C. Chow
Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions
J.C. Nunnally, I.H. Bernstein
Psychometric Theory
Purpose – This study aims to investigate the effects of perceived tangible and intangible resource inequity and the moderating effect of long‐term orientation on future collaboration. Design/methodology/approach – Outcome and moderating measures were developed using structural equation modeling. Data were collected at the project level of customer‐supplier relationships via survey among German and Swiss firms. The results were generated with regression and subgroup analyses. Findings – The higher the negative tangible inequity or intangible inequity, the lower the customers' willingness to collaborate on future projects with suppliers. However, negative intangible inequity showed a stronger negative effect than negative tangible inequity. When long‐term orientation is in the model, the effects of inequity are stronger in short‐term relationships. Research limitations/implications – The study extends equity theory and provides a fruitful basis for future research at the project level of the customer‐supplier relationships. Specifically, since the effects of negative intangible inequity are stronger than the effects of negative tangible inequity, intangible resources may be more important than tangible resources to the future of customer‐supplier relationships. Since prior research does not delineate between tangible and intangible inequity, this is a unique finding and an important contribution to the application of equity theory in business. Cultural homogeneity is a limitation of the study. Furthermore, a longitudinal study could add insight. Originality/value – This research offers a distinction between the effects of tangible and intangible resource inequity; it disaggregates the concepts of tangible and intangible resource inequity and tests the effects of either “positive inequity” (i.e. receiving more than deserved) or “negative inequity” (i.e. receiving less than deserved); and it separates short‐term from long‐term oriented companies to allow for a more discrete analysis, than prior approaches, of the effects of inequity on the propensity for future collaboration.
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 5, 2012
Keywords: Buyer‐seller relationships; Exchange; Germany; Switzerland; Resources; Suppliers; Resource allocation; Supplier relations
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.