Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Hedlund (2007)
A model of knowledge management and the N‐form corporationSouthern Medical Journal, 15
Ali Akgün, G. Lynn, John Byrne (2003)
Organizational Learning: A Socio-Cognitive FrameworkHuman Relations, 56
Robert Buckman (1998)
KNOWLEDGE SHARING AT BUCKMAN LABSJournal of Business Strategy, 19
C. Holsapple, Kiku Jones (2004)
Exploring primary activities of the knowledge chainKnowledge and Process Management, 11
R. Hall, P. Andriani (2003)
Managing knowledge associated with innovationJournal of Business Research, 56
L. Argote, Bill McEvily, R. Reagans (2003)
Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging ThemesManag. Sci., 49
T. Davenport, S. Völpel (2001)
The rise of knowledge towards attention managementJ. Knowl. Manag., 5
Tua Haldin-Herrgård (2000)
Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizationsJournal of Intellectual Capital, 1
T. Clarke, C. Rollo (2001)
Corporate initiatives in knowledge managementJournal of Knowledge Management
I. Becerra-Fernandez, R. Sabherwal (2001)
Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency PerspectiveJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 18
J. Johannessen, J. Olaisen, Bjørn Olsen (2001)
Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about itInt. J. Inf. Manag., 21
M. Zack (1999)
Managing Codified KnowledgeSloan Management Review, 40
I. Nonaka, N. Konno (1998)
The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge CreationCalifornia Management Review, 40
W. Swap, D. Leonard, Mimi Shields, Lisa Abrams (2001)
Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in the WorkplaceJournal of Management Information Systems, 18
Carol Gorelick, Brigitte Tantawy‐Monsou (2005)
For performance through learning, knowledge management is the critical practiceThe Learning Organization, 12
W. Rodgers (2003)
Measurement and reporting of knowledge‐based assetsJournal of Intellectual Capital, 4
G. Huber (1991)
Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the LiteraturesOrganization Science, 2
C. Gore, E. Gore (1999)
Knowledge management: The way forwardTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 10
Ryan Lahti, Eric Darr, Valdis Krebs (2002)
Developing the productivity of a dynamic workforce: The impact of informal knowledge transferJournal of Organizational Excellence, 21
Christopher Lueg (2001)
Information, knowledge, and networked mindsJ. Knowl. Manag., 5
M. Osterloh, B. Frey (1999)
Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational FormsLabor: Personnel Economics
Rob Cross, Andrew Parker, L. Prusak, S. Borgatti (2001)
Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social NetworksOrganizational Dynamics, 30
L. Argote, P. Ingram (2000)
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMSOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82
W. Orlikowski (2002)
Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed OrganizingOrgan. Sci., 13
R. Sabherwal, I. Becerra-Fernandez (2003)
An Empirical Study of the Effect of Knowledge Management Processes at Individual, Group, and Organizational LevelsDecis. Sci., 34
P. Bierly, E. Kessler, E. Christensen (2000)
Organizational learning, knowledge and wisdomJournal of Organizational Change Management, 13
S. Goh (2002)
Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implicationsJ. Knowl. Manag., 6
B. Lundvall, B. Johnson (1994)
The Learning EconomyIndustry and Innovation, 1
The organizational behavior and knowledge management literature has devoted a lot attention on how structural knowledge processes enhance learning. There has been little emphasis on the informal knowledge processes and the construct remains undefined. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the importance of informal knowledge processes, propose a definition for these processes and link them to the socialization and internalization processes suggested by Nonaka and Takeuchi in the SECI model. The paper offers a fresh perspective on how informal knowledge processes in organizations help to enhance the organization’s learning capability. It will enable scholars and managers to have a better understanding of how informal knowledge processes promote tacit knowledge.
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.