Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

System wide collaboration? Health and social care leaders’ perspectives on working across boundaries

System wide collaboration? Health and social care leaders’ perspectives on working across boundaries Structural integration is increasingly explored as a means of achieving efficiency gains alongside improved health outcomes. In 2015, three boroughs in London, England began working together to develop an Accountable Care Organisation for the 750,000 population they serve. The purpose of this paper is to understand the experiences of working across organisational and sectoral boundaries for the benefit of the population, including enablers and barriers encountered, the role of financial incentives and perspectives on Accountable Care Organisations.Design/methodology/approachA single site instrumental case study involving 35 semi-structured interviews using a topic guide, with key leaders and decision makers from the site and nationally, between April 2016 and August 2016.FindingsThere are differences in levels of autonomy and operational priorities between councils and the NHS. Existing financial mechanisms can be used to overcome sectoral boundaries, but require strong leadership to implement. There are challenges associated with primary care participating in integration, including reluctance for small organisations to adopt the risk associated with large scale programmes. Interviewees were aligned on espoused ambitions for the Accountable Care Organisation but not on whether one organisation was needed to deliver these in practice.Research limitations/implicationsProgressing the integration agenda requires consideration of the context of primary care and the core differences between health and government. Further, research into ACOs is required as they may not be required to deliver the anticipated integration and system outcomes. Understanding if there are specific population groups for whom cross-organisation and cross-sector working could have particular benefits would help to target efforts.Originality/valueThis paper highlights some of the challenges associated with cross-sector collaboration. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Integrated Care Emerald Publishing

System wide collaboration? Health and social care leaders’ perspectives on working across boundaries

Shand, Jenny; Turner, Simon
Journal of Integrated Care , Volume 27 (1): 12 – Feb 8, 2019
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/system-wide-collaboration-health-and-social-care-leaders-perspectives-0Dl04VUb00

References (19)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1476-9018
DOI
10.1108/jica-06-2018-0042
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Structural integration is increasingly explored as a means of achieving efficiency gains alongside improved health outcomes. In 2015, three boroughs in London, England began working together to develop an Accountable Care Organisation for the 750,000 population they serve. The purpose of this paper is to understand the experiences of working across organisational and sectoral boundaries for the benefit of the population, including enablers and barriers encountered, the role of financial incentives and perspectives on Accountable Care Organisations.Design/methodology/approachA single site instrumental case study involving 35 semi-structured interviews using a topic guide, with key leaders and decision makers from the site and nationally, between April 2016 and August 2016.FindingsThere are differences in levels of autonomy and operational priorities between councils and the NHS. Existing financial mechanisms can be used to overcome sectoral boundaries, but require strong leadership to implement. There are challenges associated with primary care participating in integration, including reluctance for small organisations to adopt the risk associated with large scale programmes. Interviewees were aligned on espoused ambitions for the Accountable Care Organisation but not on whether one organisation was needed to deliver these in practice.Research limitations/implicationsProgressing the integration agenda requires consideration of the context of primary care and the core differences between health and government. Further, research into ACOs is required as they may not be required to deliver the anticipated integration and system outcomes. Understanding if there are specific population groups for whom cross-organisation and cross-sector working could have particular benefits would help to target efforts.Originality/valueThis paper highlights some of the challenges associated with cross-sector collaboration.

Journal

Journal of Integrated Care – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 8, 2019

Keywords: Integrated care; Integrated health and social care; Interagency working; Partnership working

There are no references for this article.