System dynamics modelling for a balanced scorecard Computing the influence of skills, customers, and work in process on the return on capital employed

System dynamics modelling for a balanced scorecard Computing the influence of skills, customers,... Purpose – This paper seeks to construct a dynamic model/framework inspired by a case study based on an international company. As described by the theory, one of the main difficulties of balanced scorecard (BSC) is to foresee the time lag dimension of different types of indicators and their combined dynamic effects. Design/methodology/approach – A case study model is used to develop time or dynamic dimensions by using a system dynamics modelling approach. The model includes five perspectives and a number of financial and non‐financial measures. All indicators are defined and related to a coherent number of different cause‐and‐effect relationships based on knowledge and experience. Through three different scenarios we demonstrate the effects of different drivers on the profit and on Return on Capital Employed are demonstrated. Findings – The results show that a minimal change in one of the base variables (skills, customer base or work in process) may have a major influence on other indicators and profit and may be impossible to predict without using a dynamic model. Practical implications – The model may be used as the first step in quantifying the cause‐and‐effect relationships of an integrated BSC model. Using the system dynamics model provides added insight in the BSC and may also serve as a teaching exercise of BSC. Originality/value – Work on dynamic aspects of BSCs is just in an early state, so the aim of any work is to contribute to both scholars' and practitioners' basic understanding of how such delayed dynamics propagate through systems and time. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Management Research News Emerald Publishing

System dynamics modelling for a balanced scorecard Computing the influence of skills, customers, and work in process on the return on capital employed

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/system-dynamics-modelling-for-a-balanced-scorecard-computing-the-ZUgCDVUed8
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper seeks to construct a dynamic model/framework inspired by a case study based on an international company. As described by the theory, one of the main difficulties of balanced scorecard (BSC) is to foresee the time lag dimension of different types of indicators and their combined dynamic effects. Design/methodology/approach – A case study model is used to develop time or dynamic dimensions by using a system dynamics modelling approach. The model includes five perspectives and a number of financial and non‐financial measures. All indicators are defined and related to a coherent number of different cause‐and‐effect relationships based on knowledge and experience. Through three different scenarios we demonstrate the effects of different drivers on the profit and on Return on Capital Employed are demonstrated. Findings – The results show that a minimal change in one of the base variables (skills, customer base or work in process) may have a major influence on other indicators and profit and may be impossible to predict without using a dynamic model. Practical implications – The model may be used as the first step in quantifying the cause‐and‐effect relationships of an integrated BSC model. Using the system dynamics model provides added insight in the BSC and may also serve as a teaching exercise of BSC. Originality/value – Work on dynamic aspects of BSCs is just in an early state, so the aim of any work is to contribute to both scholars' and practitioners' basic understanding of how such delayed dynamics propagate through systems and time.

Journal

Management Research NewsEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 31, 2008

Keywords: Balanced scorecard; System monitoring; Performance measurement (quality); Time to market; Simulation

References

  • Motives, diffusion and utilisation of the balanced scorecard in Denmark
    Nielsen, S.; Sørensen, R.
  • Using case studies in research
    Rowley, J.
  • Group model‐building: tackling messy problems
    Vennix, J.A.M.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off