Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Subverting the universality of metadata standards

Subverting the universality of metadata standards The purpose of this paper is to investigate the underlying meanings, effects and cultural patterns of metadata standards, focusing on Dublin Core (DC), and explore the ways in which anticolonial metadata tools can be applied to exercise and promote Indigenous data sovereignty.Design/methodology/approachApplying an anticolonial approach, this paper examines the assumptions underpinning the stated roles of two of DC’s metadata elements, rights and creator. Based on that examination, the paper considers the limitations of DC for appropriately documenting Indigenous traditional knowledge (TK). Introduction of the TK labels and their implementation are put forward as an alternative method to such limitations in metadata standards.FindingsThe analysis of the rights and creator elements revealed that DC’s universality and supposed neutrality threaten the rightful attribution, specificity and dynamism of TK, undermining Indigenous data sovereignty. The paper advocates for alternative descriptive methods grounded within tribal sovereignty values while recognizing the difficulties of dealing with issues of interoperability by means of metadata standards given potentially innate tendencies to customization within communities.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to directly examine the implications of DC’s rights and creator elements for documenting TK. The paper identifies ethical practices and culturally appropriate tools that unsettle the universality claims of metadata standards. By introducing the TK labels, the paper contributes to the efforts of Indigenous communities to regain control and ownership of their cultural and intellectual property. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Documentation Emerald Publishing

Subverting the universality of metadata standards

Montenegro, María
Journal of Documentation , Volume 75 (4): 19 – Jun 21, 2019
Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/subverting-the-universality-of-metadata-standards-AXRAotgBJl
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0022-0418
DOI
10.1108/jd-08-2018-0124
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the underlying meanings, effects and cultural patterns of metadata standards, focusing on Dublin Core (DC), and explore the ways in which anticolonial metadata tools can be applied to exercise and promote Indigenous data sovereignty.Design/methodology/approachApplying an anticolonial approach, this paper examines the assumptions underpinning the stated roles of two of DC’s metadata elements, rights and creator. Based on that examination, the paper considers the limitations of DC for appropriately documenting Indigenous traditional knowledge (TK). Introduction of the TK labels and their implementation are put forward as an alternative method to such limitations in metadata standards.FindingsThe analysis of the rights and creator elements revealed that DC’s universality and supposed neutrality threaten the rightful attribution, specificity and dynamism of TK, undermining Indigenous data sovereignty. The paper advocates for alternative descriptive methods grounded within tribal sovereignty values while recognizing the difficulties of dealing with issues of interoperability by means of metadata standards given potentially innate tendencies to customization within communities.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to directly examine the implications of DC’s rights and creator elements for documenting TK. The paper identifies ethical practices and culturally appropriate tools that unsettle the universality claims of metadata standards. By introducing the TK labels, the paper contributes to the efforts of Indigenous communities to regain control and ownership of their cultural and intellectual property.

Journal

Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 21, 2019

Keywords: Traditional knowledge; Dublin Core; Metadata standards; Indigenous communities; Indigenous data sovereignty; TK labels; Universality

References

  • Local Contexts 2.0
    Anderson, J.
  • Personal communication
    Anderson, J.
  • Negotiating who ‘owns’ Penobscot culture
    Anderson, J.
  • ‘Chuck a copyright on It’: dilemmas of digital return and the possibilities for traditional knowledge licenses and labels
    Anderson, J.; Christen, K.
  • (Colonial) archives and (copyright) law
    Anderson, J.
  • Archival assemblages: applying disability studies’ political/relational model to archival description
    Brilmyer, G.
  • Identifying useful approaches to the governance of indigenous data
    Bruhn, J.
  • In defense of property
    Carpenter, K.A.; Katyal, S.K.; Riley, A.R.
  • Opening archives: respectful repatriation
    Christen, K.
  • Tribal archives, traditional knowledge, and Local Contexts: why the ‘s’ matters
    Christen, K.
  • Towards an archival critique: opening possibilities for addressing neoliberalism in the archival field
    Cifor, M.; Lee, J.A.
  • Queering the catalog: queer theory and the politics of correction
    Drabinski, E.
  • Stories and names: archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings
    Duff, W.; Harris, V.
  • Metadata standards: what, who and why
    Duval, E.
  • A community-driven metadata framework for describing cultural resources: the digital library north project
    Farnel, S.; Shiri, A.; Campbell, S.; Cockney, C.; Rathi, D.; Stobbs, R.
  • Dewey deracialized: a critical race–theoretic perspective
    Furner, J.
  • Setting the stage
    Gilliland, A.; Baca, M.
  • The quest to integrate the world’s knowledge: American archival engagement with the documentation movement 1900–1950
    Gilliland, A.
  • Recordkeeping metadata, the archival multiverse, and societal grand challenges
    Gilliland, A.; McKemmish, S.
  • What is a document institution? A case study from the South Sámi community
    Grenersen, G.
  • Representation of indigenous cultures: considering the Hawaiian hula
    Hajibayova, L.; Buente, W.
  • Is it possible to decolonize the commons? An interview with Jane Anderson of Local Contexts
    Halperin, J.R.
  • A forum for indigenous culture building and preservation
    Lissonnet, S.; Nevile, L.
  • Knowledge organization from an indigenous perspective: the Mashantucket Pequot Thesaurus of American Indian Terminology Project
    Littletree, S.; Metoyer, C.A.
  • Introduction
    Metoyer, C.A.; Doyle, A.M.
  • The power to name: representation in library catalogs
    Olson, H.
  • Moving forward: breaking the cycle of mistrust between american indians and researchers
    Pacheco, C.M.
  • Dublin core metadata semantics: an analysis of the perspectives of information professionals
    Park, J.; Childress, E.
  • Data as a strategic resource: self-determination, governance, and the data challenge for indigenous nations in the United States
    Rainie, S.C.; Schultz, J.L.; Briggs, E.; Riggs, P.; Palmanteer-Holder, N.L.
  • Perspectives on American Indian Health
    Roubideaux, D.Y.
  • The strategic power of data: a key aspect of sovereignty
    Schultz, J.L.; Rainie, S.C.
  • Imagining our own approaches
    Smith, L.T.
  • Diverse knowledges and contact zones within the digital museum
    Srinivasan, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Boast, R.; Enote, J.
  • History, memory and music: the repatriation of digital audio to Yolngu communities, or, memory as metadata
    Toner, P.
  • Building Sípnuuk: a digital library, archives, and museum for indigenous peoples
    Tribe, K.; Hillman, L.; Hillman, L.; Harling, A.; Talley, B.; McLaughlin, A.
  • The Passamaquoddy reclaim their culture through digital repatriation
    Kim, E.T.
  • Marginalization and exclusion: unraveling systemic bias in classification
    Mai, J.E.
  • Introductory note to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Cal v. Attorney General, Supreme Court of Belize
    Mohamed, S.