Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Vladica Veličković, M. Jović, Ena Nalić, A. Višnjić, O. Radulović, Č. Šagrić, Milan Ćirić (2016)
Knowledge, Attitudes Toward, and Acceptability of Genetic Modification among Western Balkan University Students of Life Sciences (AGREE Study)Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 35
Trepti Singh, S. Shukla, Pradeep Kumar, Verinder Wahla, V. Bajpai, I. Rather (2017)
Application of Nanotechnology in Food Science: Perception and OverviewFrontiers in Microbiology, 8
T. Napier, M. Tucker, C. Henry, S. Whaley (2006)
Consumer attitudes toward GMOs: The Ohio experienceJournal of Food Science, 69
Ebru Öztürk-Akar (2017)
Turkish university students' knowledge of biotechnology and attitudes toward biotechnological applicationsBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45
S. Wunderlich, K. Gatto (2015)
Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.Advances in nutrition, 6 6
M. Brewer, M. Rojas (2008)
CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARD ISSUES IN FOOD SAFETYJournal of Food Safety, 28
P. Prokop, Andrea Lešková, Milan Kubiatko, Carla Diran (2007)
Slovakian Students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes toward BiotechnologyInternational Journal of Science Education, 29
Dalal Al-Jebreen (2010)
Perceptions and attitudes of Riyadh university students towards products derived from genetically modified crops in Saudi Arabia.Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS, 13 1
Jour of Consum Pol, 21
Virginia Sarno, R. Manzo (2016)
Italian companies’ attitude towards GM cropsNutrition & Food Science, 46
A. Knight (2009)
Perceptions, Knowledge and ethical concerns with GM foods and the GM processPublic Understanding of Science, 18
F. Maekawa, D. Macer (2004)
How Japanese students reason about agricultural biotechnologyScience and Engineering Ethics, 10
env. Prot and Natur Resour, 28
S. Potter, Jason Bragg, Mozes Blom, J. Deakin, M. Kirkpatrick, M. Eldridge, C. Moritz (2017)
Chromosomal Speciation in the Genomics Era: Disentangling Phylogenetic Evolution of Rock-wallabiesFrontiers in Genetics, 8
Nigel Steenis, A. Fischer (2016)
Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnology in food products : an attribute-based analysisBritish Food Journal, 118
M. Usak, Mehmet Erdoğan, P. Prokop, Murat Ozel (2009)
High school and university students' knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnologyBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37
M. Siegrist, M. Cousin, H. Kastenholz, Arnim Wiek (2007)
Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trustAppetite, 49
F. Boccia, D. Covino, P. Sarnacchiaro (2018)
Genetically modified food versus knowledge and fear: A Noumenic approach for consumer behaviour.Food research international, 111
Montserrat Costa-Font, José Gil, W. Traill (2008)
Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policyFood Policy, 33
A. Wnuk, M. Kozak (2011)
Knowledge about and Attitudes to GMOs among Students from Various SpecializationsOutlook on Agriculture, 40
M. Siegrist, N. Stampfli, H. Kastenholz (2009)
Acceptance of nanotechnology foods: a conjoint study examining consumers' willingness to buyBritish Food Journal, 111
(2014)
GMOs: What are they?
Ingrida Lukošiutė, Petrauskaitė-Senkevič (2017)
EVALUATION OF LITHUANIAN CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDES TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODJournal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 2017
Tatiane Ribeiro, Bruna Barone, J. Behrens (2016)
Genetically modified foods and their social representationFood Research International, 84
M. Veeman, W. Adamowicz, Wuyang Hu (2005)
Risk Perceptions, Social Interactions and the Influence of Information on Social Attitudes to Agricultural BiotechnologyProject Report Series
A. Krzepiłko, M. Skowrońska, Iwona Krzepiłko, A. Filipiuk (2017)
Opinion Survey of Lublin University Students on Genetically Modified PlantsBarometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy
Frédéric Vandermoere, S. Blanchemanche, A. Bieberstein, S. Marette, J. Roosen (2011)
The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domainPublic Understanding of Science, 20
G. Gustinelli, Lovisa Eliasson, Cecilia Svelander, T. Andlid, L. Lundin, L. Ahrné, M. Alminger (2018)
Supercritical Fluid Extraction of Berry Seeds: Chemical Composition and Antioxidant ActivityJournal of Food Quality
Grant Gardner, Gail Jones, Amy Taylor, Jennifer Forrester, L. Robertson (2010)
Students’ Risk Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications: Implications for science educationInternational Journal of Science Education, 32
P. Montuori, M. Triassi, P. Sarnacchiaro (2012)
The consumption of genetically modified foods in Italian high school studentsFood Quality and Preference, 26
F. Boccia (2016)
Consumer perception: an analysis on second generation genetically modified foodsNutrition & Food Science, 46
C. Ineichen, N. Biller-Andorno, Anna Deplazes‐Zemp (2017)
Image of Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology: A Survey among University StudentsFrontiers in Genetics, 8
J. Lakin, Yi Han, Edward Davis (2016)
First-Year Students' Attitudes towards the Grand Challenges and Nanotechnology.Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17
Chengyan Yue, Shuoli Zhao, Christopher Cummings, J. Kuzma (2015)
Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-foodJournal of Nanoparticle Research, 17
H. Sheehy, Marc Legault, D. Ireland (1998)
Consumers and Biotechnology: A Synopsis of Survey and Focus Group ResearchJournal of Consumer Policy, 21
J. Chmielewski, E. Ochwanowska, Małgorzata Czarny-Działak, J. Łuszczki (2017)
Genetically modified foods in the opinion of the second-year students of biology, biotechnology and tourism and recreation of the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce – a preliminary studyOchrona Srodowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych, 28
E. Goddard, V. Muringai, A. Boaitey (2018)
Food Integrity and Food Technology Concerns in Canada: Evidence from Two Public SurveysJournal of Food Quality, 2018
S. Lachowski, A. Jurkiewicz, Piotr Choina, Magdalena Florek-Łuszczki, A. Buczaj, M. Goździewska (2017)
Readiness of adolescents to use genetically modified organisms according to their knowledge and emotional attitude towards GMOs.Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM, 24 2
Bhuyan Tamanna, Khanuja Manika, Rishabh Sharma, S. Patel, M. Reddy, S. Anand, A. Varma (2015)
抗菌及び光触媒用の純粋及び銅(Cu)ドープZnOナノロッドの比較研究とそれらの作用機構, 17
H. Diefes‐Dux, Melissa Dyehouse, D. Bennett, P. Imbrie (2007)
Nanotechnology Awareness of First-Year Food and Agriculture Students Following a Brief ExposureJournal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 36
E. Giles, S. Kuznesof, B. Clark, C. Hubbard, L. Frewer (2015)
Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic reviewJournal of Nanoparticle Research, 17
V. Sodano, M. Gorgitano, F. Verneau, C. Vitale (2016)
Consumer acceptance of food nanotechnology in ItalyBritish Food Journal, 118
The purpose of this paper is to investigate knowledge and attitudes toward genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and nanotechnology among the Canadian youth demographic. The primary objective of this pilot study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes toward GMOs and nanotechnology among first year university students. The secondary objective was to compare knowledge and attitudes toward GMOs and nanotechnology among students studying nutrition as to students who do not study nutrition.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire was developed by researchers and student volunteers. This questionnaire was distributed to first year university classes at Western University. The multiple-choice questions were analyzed using SAS, and open-ended questions were analyzed using theme analysis.FindingsGMO knowledge was strong for both populations, however questions related to the percentage of GM foods grown in Canada indicated nutrition students had a stronger GMO knowledge (p = 0.031). Open-ended questions revealed overall attitudes toward GMOs were either unsure or negative between both populations. Nutrition students had a more positive attitude toward nanotechnology, and a slightly stronger knowledge regarding applications of nanotechnology (p = 0.006). Theme analysis indicated that participants enrolled in nutritional studies were less apprehensive toward GMOs. No differences were indicated in open-ended questions related to nanotechnology between both groups, which may be due to the lack of awareness related to the novelty of the technology.Research limitations/implicationsWithout a validated questionnaire, this reduces the reliability of the results from the questionnaire. The questionnaire was carefully designed by combining previous studies questionnaires, as well as producing questions from related literature, which increases the reliability and accuracy of the questionnaire. In addition, the questionnaires underwent several rounds of pre-piloting as well as multiple revisions with current health-care professions to increase the reliability and accuracy of the questionnaire.Practical implicationsThis study will assist in understanding the current knowledge of GMOs and nanotechnology among first year university students. This will then allow us to understand if knowledge has a factor in altering students’ attitudes toward these technologies. If students do not have a strong knowledge toward these technologies, then this may lead to the potential implementation of education regarding GMOs and nanotechnology. As these technologies are emerging and being used in everyday food items, individuals should be aware of the implications, as well as the benefits of these technologies.Originality/valueThis is the first study regarding this topic in Canada. Results from this study provide baseline data that may be used to conduct future research.
Nutrition & Food Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 12, 2019
Keywords: Nanotechnology; GMOs; Knowledge; Attitudes; Genetically modified organisms; Nano foods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.