Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Johnson, N. Dasgupta, Hao Zhang, M. Evans (2009)
Internet Approach versus Lecture and Lab‐Based Approach for Teaching an Introductory Statistical Methods Course: Students’ OpinionsTeaching Statistics, 31
S.E. Quay, A. Pastelis, K. McLaughlin, E. Cain
What college professors can learn from K‐12 educators
Minjuan Wang (2007)
Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgroundsBr. J. Educ. Technol., 38
S. Bennett, K. Maton, L. Kervin (2008)
The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidenceBr. J. Educ. Technol., 39
Sanghoon Park, Jung Lim (2005)
Promoting Positive Emotion in Multimedia Learning Using Visual IllustrationsJournal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16
Diana Oblinger, James Oblinger, J. Lippincott (2005)
Educating the Net Generation
H. Beetham, L. McGill, A. Littlejohn
Thriving in the 21st century: learning literacies for the digital age”, (LLiDA project)
P. Reimann
The role of external representations in distributed problem solving
R. Mayer (2001)
Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning
Laurie Charnigo (2009)
Lights! Camera! Action! Producing Library Instruction Video Tutorials Using Camtasia StudioJournal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 3
S. Silver, Lisa Nickel (2005)
Are Online Tutorials Effective? A Comparison of Online and Classroom Library Instruction Methods.Research Strategies, 20
J. Calvin, B. Freeburg (2010)
Exploring Adult Learners' Perceptions of Technology Competence and Retention in Web-Based CoursesThe Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11
J. Birchman, M. Sadowski (2007)
Strategies for Bridging Learning Styles.Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 71
Marc Bornstein, H. Gardner (1986)
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple IntelligencesThe Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20
K. Thompson (1985)
Cognitive and Analytical Psychology Howard Gardner .Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York, Basic Books, 1983.The San Francisco Jung Institute Library Journal, 5
James Stapleton, H. Wen, D. Starrett, Michelle Kilburn (2007)
Generational differences in using online learning systemsHuman systems management, 26
D. McAnany
Monkeys on the screen? Multicultural issues in instructional message design
A. Zapalska, Dallas Brozik (2006)
Learning styles and online educationCampus-wide Information Systems, 23
E. Hahn (2012)
Video lectures help enhance online information literacy courseReference Services Review, 40
Marieke Kools, M. Wiel, R. Ruiter, G. Kok (2006)
Pictures and text in instructions for medical devices: effects on recall and actual performance.Patient education and counseling, 64 1-3
Karen Milheim (2005)
Identifying and Addressing the Needs of Adult Students in Higher Education.Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45
H. Morgan (2010)
Improving Schooling for Cultural Minorities: The Right Teaching Styles Can Make a Big Difference.educational HORIZONS, 88
R.E. Mayer
Multimedia Learning
R. Moreno, R. Mayer (2000)
Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92
C. Jung
Psychological Types
C. Kenner, Jason Weinerman (2011)
Adult Learning Theory: Applications to Non-Traditional College StudentsJournal of College Reading and Learning, 41
R.E. Mayer, O’Neil, H.F., Perez, R.S.
Ten research‐based principles of multimedia learning
Y. Rogers (1999)
What is different about interactive graphical representationsLearning and Instruction
Association of College and Research Libraries
Information literacy competency standards for higher education
D. Blunt (2006)
The Effects of Multiculturalism within the Parameters of Instructional Course Design.
S. Park, J. Lim
The effect of graphical representation on the learner’s learning interest and achievement in multimedia learning
Bertram Bruce, Heather Dowd, D. Eastburn, C. D'arcy (2005)
Plants, Pathogens, and People: Extending the Classroom to the WebTeachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 107
R. Mayer, Sherry Fennell, Lindsay Farmer, Julie Campbell (2004)
A Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning: Students Learn Better When Words Are in Conversational Style Rather Than Formal Style.Journal of Educational Psychology, 96
C. Hansen (2001)
The Internet Navigator: An Online Internet Course for Distance LearnersLibr. Trends, 50
H. Gardner (1999)
Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century
G.D. Hughes
Using videos to bring a lecture into the online classroom
M. Slebodnik, C. Riehle (2009)
Creating Online Tutorials at Your Libraries: Software Choices and Practical ImplicationsReference and User Services Quarterly, 49
Diana Oblinger (2003)
Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.".Educational Review, 38
Kristin Henrich, R. Attebury (2012)
Using Blackboard to Assess Course-Specific Asynchronous Library InstructionInternet Reference Services Quarterly, 17
R. Clark, R. Mayer (2002)
e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning
R. Moreno, R. Mayer (1999)
Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and ContiguityJournal of Educational Psychology, 91
Debbie McAnany (2013)
of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l ’ apprentissage et de la technologie , V 35 ( 1 ) Winter / hiver , 2009 Monkeys on the Screen ? : Multicultural Issues in Instructional Message Design
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate a for‐credit information literacy course redesign that used a flexible multimodal framework to address individual student learning preferences, personal differences and abilities as well as teaching preferences. Design/methodology/approach – Students taking the course were surveyed as to their preferences for content delivery. A qualitative analysis of student reflections was conducted to determine the efficacy of maintaining multiple course formats and to solicit feedback for course improvements. Findings – Results show that students were definitive in their preferences for how they access course materials and that enough students used each format to justify maintaining both. Findings also showed students’ appreciation for being given options. Research limitations/implications – Content delivery modes are changing rapidly. Future studies should explore the efficacy of other modes of delivery. Practical implications – As technology and students’ familiarity with course delivery modes change, how we deliver content to students will also change. The key to reaching students in an effective manner is flexibility. Originality/value – Exploring why and how students choose to learn provides valuable feedback into how we should or should not deliver course content. Learning what works, and providing multiple options, will increase the likelihood of success for a diverse student body.
Reference Services Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 5, 2014
Keywords: Information literacy; Online courses; Library instruction; Course delivery; Multimodal; Video lectures
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.