Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Student corporate brand identification: an exploratory case study

Student corporate brand identification: an exploratory case study Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate student corporate brand identification towards three closely‐linked corporate brands: a UK university, a leading UK business school and an overseas collaborative partner institute in Asia. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a theory‐building case study within the phenomenological/qualitative research tradition. Findings – The strength of student identification with a corporate brand is predicated on awareness, knowledge and experience of a brand. The data revealed three types of corporate brand identification. This reflected different modes of student affiliation with the three institutional brands. These student relationships were categorised as follows: brand member (a contractual/legal corporate brand relationship); brand supporter (a trusting corporate brand relationship); and brand owner (a proprietorial corporate brand relationship). In explaining the above, the above states are viewed in terms of a corporate brand identification management hierarchy which reflects different approaches to the management of corporate brands. These are categorised as legalisation, realisation and, finally, (brand) actualisation. Senior managers should strive for brand actualisation. Research limitations/implications – The insights from a single, exploratory, case study might not be generalisable. Practical implications – The paper conceptualises that a bureaucratic/product approach to corporate brand management is more likely to result in low brand identification (legalisation); that a diplomatic/communications management approach is more likely to result in moderate brand identification (realisation) and, finally, that a custodial/brand values and promise management approach is more likely to result in high brand identification (brand actualisation). These categorisations can have a utility in ascertaining the effectiveness and philosophical underpinnings of corporate brand management. Originality/value – The paper examines multiple student identification (towards a university, business school and a non degree‐awarding overseas institute). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Corporate Communications An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Student corporate brand identification: an exploratory case study

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/student-corporate-brand-identification-an-exploratory-case-study-1fyCjSJhjG

References (117)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1356-3289
DOI
10.1108/13563280710832515
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate student corporate brand identification towards three closely‐linked corporate brands: a UK university, a leading UK business school and an overseas collaborative partner institute in Asia. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a theory‐building case study within the phenomenological/qualitative research tradition. Findings – The strength of student identification with a corporate brand is predicated on awareness, knowledge and experience of a brand. The data revealed three types of corporate brand identification. This reflected different modes of student affiliation with the three institutional brands. These student relationships were categorised as follows: brand member (a contractual/legal corporate brand relationship); brand supporter (a trusting corporate brand relationship); and brand owner (a proprietorial corporate brand relationship). In explaining the above, the above states are viewed in terms of a corporate brand identification management hierarchy which reflects different approaches to the management of corporate brands. These are categorised as legalisation, realisation and, finally, (brand) actualisation. Senior managers should strive for brand actualisation. Research limitations/implications – The insights from a single, exploratory, case study might not be generalisable. Practical implications – The paper conceptualises that a bureaucratic/product approach to corporate brand management is more likely to result in low brand identification (legalisation); that a diplomatic/communications management approach is more likely to result in moderate brand identification (realisation) and, finally, that a custodial/brand values and promise management approach is more likely to result in high brand identification (brand actualisation). These categorisations can have a utility in ascertaining the effectiveness and philosophical underpinnings of corporate brand management. Originality/value – The paper examines multiple student identification (towards a university, business school and a non degree‐awarding overseas institute).

Journal

Corporate Communications An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 16, 2007

Keywords: Business schools; Corporate branding; Brand identity; Franchising; Higher education; Universities

There are no references for this article.