Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Varney (1977)
Organization Development for Managers
M. McGill (1977)
Organization development for operating managers
W. French, Cecil Bell (1999)
Organization development : behavioral science interventions for organization improvement
L. Crocker (1968)
Rousseau's Social contract : an interpretive essay
R. Walton, D. Warwick (1973)
The Ethics of Organization DevelopmentThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9
T. Cummings, C. Worley (1975)
Organization development and change
W. Bennis (1969)
Organization Development: Its Nature, Origins, and Prospects
R. Clement (1992)
The changing face of organization development: Views of a manager-turned-academicBusiness Horizons, 35
W. Burke (1976)
Organization Development in TransitionThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12
W. Mastenbroek (1988)
Conflict Management and Organization Development
W. Burke (1987)
Organization development : a normative view
Recently, the author facilitated a particularly difficult organization development (OD) intervention with a private non‐profit organization. It was an organization whose staff and governing board were deeply divided by interpersonal conflict. Although he tried to avoid it, the author found himself pulled into the politics of this organization. This intervention caused him to ask the question: Who is the client in an OD intervention? Is it the person who hired him? The entire organization? The organization's board? OD practitioners, as reflected in the academic literature, either provide conflicting views on this point or ignore the question altogether. Citing quotations from many prominent OD practitioners, including Golembiewski, Bennis, Burke, French and Bell, and Weisbord, the author searches for a definitive answer in the literature. In this paper, which is part literature review and part case study, he takes a critical look at the OD literature on this topic; ties OD to Jean Jacques Rousseau's concept of the general will; writes an in‐depth case study; and provides his reflections on this issue. The author concludes that within a highly politicized and contentious organization, it can be highly problematic for the OD practitioner to work for the organization as a whole, since he/she may, at times, be forced to take sides.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2004
Keywords: Organizations; Politics; Facilitation; Communities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.