Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Structure, governance and challenges of networks in the public sector: the case of the power network in Pakistan

Structure, governance and challenges of networks in the public sector: the case of the power... With governance networks as the critical emerging feature of public administration, this article examines the structure, governance and challenges of networks in the public sector. Using complexity theory, this article explains that control-based relations do not hold much relevance to govern the complex systems of networks.Design/methodology/approachCase study research design is employed taking the power network in Pakistan as the unit of analysis. Data were collected through eleven semi-structured interviews, companies' websites, government policy reports and other companies' reports. The structure of the power network was examined through the technique of social network analysis using UCINET. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted with the help of NVivo 13 to identify the mode of governance and challenges.FindingsThe study found that five central public sector actors have a high degree centrality and betweenness centrality. Thematic analysis further revealed that these actors are controlling most of the decisions in the network in a hierarchical mode of governance. Other actors face multiple challenges including lack of autonomy, overlapping authorities, conflicting rules and complex decision processes.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings imply that instead of top-down and control-based relations, networks require self-governance mechanisms where actors independently participate and interact with other actors to generate common solutions to problems.Practical implicationsThe authorities should use network management strategies, participatory approaches and consensus-building methods to reach decisions.Originality/valueThe study explores the network structure and network governance challenges in the context of a developing country that is barely addressed in the public management literature. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Public Sector Management Emerald Publishing

Structure, governance and challenges of networks in the public sector: the case of the power network in Pakistan

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/structure-governance-and-challenges-of-networks-in-the-public-sector-Tz2g0lu9yk
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0951-3558
DOI
10.1108/ijpsm-12-2020-0343
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

With governance networks as the critical emerging feature of public administration, this article examines the structure, governance and challenges of networks in the public sector. Using complexity theory, this article explains that control-based relations do not hold much relevance to govern the complex systems of networks.Design/methodology/approachCase study research design is employed taking the power network in Pakistan as the unit of analysis. Data were collected through eleven semi-structured interviews, companies' websites, government policy reports and other companies' reports. The structure of the power network was examined through the technique of social network analysis using UCINET. Thematic analysis of interviews was conducted with the help of NVivo 13 to identify the mode of governance and challenges.FindingsThe study found that five central public sector actors have a high degree centrality and betweenness centrality. Thematic analysis further revealed that these actors are controlling most of the decisions in the network in a hierarchical mode of governance. Other actors face multiple challenges including lack of autonomy, overlapping authorities, conflicting rules and complex decision processes.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings imply that instead of top-down and control-based relations, networks require self-governance mechanisms where actors independently participate and interact with other actors to generate common solutions to problems.Practical implicationsThe authorities should use network management strategies, participatory approaches and consensus-building methods to reach decisions.Originality/valueThe study explores the network structure and network governance challenges in the context of a developing country that is barely addressed in the public management literature.

Journal

International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 3, 2022

Keywords: Networks; Governance; Public service; Complexity theory; Power sector; SNA

References

  • Pakistan: ADB's support to Pakistan energy sector (2005-2017)
  • Rational and ritualistic use of key performance indicators in hybrid organizations
    Agostino, D.; Arnaboldi, M.
  • Networks, hierarchies, and hybrids
    Bardach, E.
  • Assessing performance and value-creation capabilities in lean healthcare: insights from a case study
    Barnabè, F.; Guercini, J.; Perna, M. Di
  • The interorganizational network as a political economy
    Benson, J.K.
  • Energy crisis in Pakistan, adaptation and mitigation measures
    Bhatti, A.G.; Bhatti, A.R.; Chaudry, I.A.; Javed, M.N.
  • What makes a key player in interorganizational social policy networks? The case of Uruguay
    Biosca, O.; Galaso, P.
  • Dealing with wicked problems in networks: analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective
    Bueren, E.M.Van; Klijn, E.H.; Koppenjan, J.
  • Communication, coherence, and collective action
    Comfort, L.K.; Haase, T.W.
  • Pakistan's unexpected dilemma: too much electricity
  • Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: a comparative analysis of six interactive processes in The Netherlands
    Edelenbos, J.; Klijn, E.H.
  • Autonomy of HR practices in Pakistan : a study of provincial autonomous bodies
    Farooq, M.; Jabeen, N.; Rizwan, A.; Salman, Y.
  • Network governance for sustainable development. A case study of the Swedish energy agency's sustainable municipality programme 2003 - 2007
    Fell, A.
  • Networks in the policy Process : an international perspective
    Forrest, J.B.
  • Incongruity between bureaucracy and society in developing nations: a critique
    Haque, S.M.
  • Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools
    Kapucu, N.; Demiroz, F.
  • Examining intergovernmental and interorganizational response to catastrophic disasters: toward a network-centered approach
    Kapucu, N.; Arslan, T.; Collins, M.L.
  • Network structures: working differently and changing expectations
    Keast, R.; Mandell, M.P.; Brown, K.; Woolcock, G.
  • Misperceptions in Pakistan: perceptions
    Khalid, I.; Begum, I.
  • Governance network Theory: past, present and future
    Klijn; Koppenjan, J.
  • Complexity in governance network theory
    Klijn, E.; Koppenjan, J.
  • The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks
    Klijn, E.H.; Steijn, B.; Edelenbos, J.
  • Policy energy and public management networks
    McGuire, M.; Fyall, R.
  • Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: a model with evidence from US Public education
    Meier, K.J.; O'Toole, J.
  • Accountability in public management Networks : an analysis of cost monitoring in Chicago municipal networks accountability in public management Networks: an analysis of cost monitoring in Chicago municipal networks
    Mitchell, D.; Mohr, Z.T.; Mitchell, D.
  • Complex governance networks: an assessment of the advances and prospects
    Morçöl, G.
  • Debate: governance networks for public service delivery—panacea or puzzle?
    Naveed, S.; Salman, Y.
  • Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: the relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaboratives
    Nowell, B.
  • Markets, bureaucracies, and clans
    Ouchi, W.
  • Captured by partners: interorganizational relationships and fund allocation stability in united way systems
    Paarlberg, L.E.; Ghosh Moulick, A.
  • Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences
    Powell, W.; White, D.; Koput, K.; Owen‐Smith, J.
  • Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness
    Provan, K.G.; Kenis, P.
  • Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness
    Provan, K.G.; Kenis, P.
  • A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness : a comparative study of four community mental health systems author
    Provan, K.; Milward, H.B.
  • Hydropower potential in Pakistan
    Qureshi, F.U.; Akıntug, B.
  • Pakistan's electricity generation has increased over time. So why do we still not have uninterrupted supply?
    Rehman, M.
  • Agencification in Pakistan: a comparative study of regulatory and service delivery agencies
    Rizwan, A.; Jadoon, Z.I.
  • Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network
    Rodríguez, C.; Langley, A.; Béland, F.; Denis, J.
  • Economic policy hints from heterogeneous agent-based simulations
    Salzano, M.; Richardson, K.; Dennard, L.; Morçöl, G.
  • Social network analysis: methods and applications/Advances in social network analysis: research in the social and behavioral sciences
    Scott, J.
  • Leading public sector networks: an empirical examination of integrative leadership behaviors
    Silvia, C.; McGuire, M.
  • Debate: taming the monster— understanding hybrid organizations and governance
    Vakkuri, J.; Johanson, J.E.
  • Network managers as facilitators: a case study on a network of specialist and generalist service providers
    Vermeiren, C.; Raeymaeckers, P.
  • Networks, fields and organizations: micro-dynamics, scale and cohesive embeddings *
    White, D.R.; Owen-Smith, J.; Moody, J.; Powell, W.W.
  • Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: is adaptive man- agement what's missing?
    Wise, C.R.
  • Determinants of network outcomes: the impact of management strategies
    Ysa, T.; Sierra, V.; Esteve, M.
  • Autonomy of public agencies in Pakistan: does structure matter?
    Zahra, A.; Jadoon, Z.I.
  • From the habit of control to institutional enablement: re-envisioning the governance of social-ecological systems from the perspective of complexity sciences
    Zia, A.; Kauffman, S.; Koliba, C.; Beckage, B.; Vattay, G.; Bomblies, A.