Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Bornmann, A. Ozimek (2012)
Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address informationJ. Informetrics, 6
Cheikh Emani, N. Cullot, C. Nicolle (2015)
Understandable Big Data: A surveyComput. Sci. Rev., 17
Nawsher Khan, Ibrar Yaqoob, I. Hashem, Zakira Inayat, Waleed Ali, Muhammad Alam, M. Shiraz, A. Gani (2014)
Big Data: Survey, Technologies, Opportunities, and ChallengesThe Scientific World Journal, 2014
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49
V. Marx (2013)
Biology: The big challenges of big dataNature, 498
Scott Tonidandel, E. King, J. Cortina (2018)
Big Data MethodsOrganizational Research Methods, 21
Li-chun Yin, H. Kretschmer, R. Hanneman, Zeyuan Liu (2006)
Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET networkInf. Process. Manag., 42
(2008)
Big Data
G. George, M. Haas, A. Pentland (2014)
Big Data and ManagementAcademy of Management Journal, 57
Arnab Nandi, Cong Yu, P. Bohannon, R. Ramakrishnan (2012)
Data Cube Materialization and Mining over MapReduceIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24
L. Leydesdorff, L. Bornmann (2011)
Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data using Overlays to Google MapsJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63
J. Manyika, M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, A.H. Byers (2011)
Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity
Philip Chen, Chun-Yang Zhang (2014)
Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big DataInf. Sci., 275
L. Leydesdorff, Ismael Rafols (2010)
Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62
Hua Fang, Zhaoyang Zhang, Chanpaul Wang, M. Daneshmand, Chonggang Wang, Honggang Wang (2015)
A survey of big data researchIEEE Network, 29
Guillermo Ronda-Pupo, L. Guerras-Martín (2012)
Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962–2008: a co-word analysisSouthern Medical Journal, 33
L. Leydesdorff, H. Park, C. Wagner (2013)
International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index: Is internationalization leading the Network?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65
V. Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, E. Lefebvre (2008)
Fast unfolding of communities in large networksJournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008
W. Nooy, Andrej Mrvar, V. Batagelj (2018)
Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Edition for Updated Software
H. Ekbia, Michael Mattioli, Inna Kouper, G. Arave, Ali Ghazinejad, T. Bowman, V. Suri, Andrew Tsou, Scott Weingart, Cassidy Sugimoto (2015)
Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical reviewJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
Ruben Casado, M. Younas (2015)
Emerging trends and technologies in big data processingConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 27
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61
S. Wamba, Shahriar Akter, A. Edwards, Geoffrey Chopin, Denis Gnanzou (2015)
How ‘Big Data’ Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case StudyManagement of Innovation eJournal
Nees Eck, L. Waltman (2009)
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mappingScientometrics, 84
S. Hampton, C. Strasser, J. Tewksbury, W. Gram, A. Budden, A. Batcheller, C. Duke, J. Porter (2013)
Big data and the future of ecologyFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11
M. Newman (2004)
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaborationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101
H. Small, B. Griffith (1974)
The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing SpecialtiesSocial Studies of Science, 4
N. Coulter, I. Monarch, Suresh Konda (1998)
Software Engineering as Seen through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word AnalysisJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 49
F. Catalá-López, A. Alonso-Arroyo, R. Aleixandre-Benavent, M. Ridao, Máxima Bolaños, A. García‐Altés, G. Sanfélix-Gimeno, S. Peiró (2012)
Coauthorship and Institutional Collaborations on Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Systematic Network AnalysisPLoS ONE, 7
K. Börner (2011)
Plug-and-play macroscopesCommunications of the ACM, 54
I. Hellsten, R. Lambiotte, A. Scharnhorst, M. Ausloos (2007)
Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility?Scientometrics, 72
Rob Kitchin (2014)
Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shiftsBig Data & Society, 1
P. Hitzler, K. Janowicz (2013)
Linked Data, Big Data, and the 4th ParadigmSemantic Web, 4
G. Khan, J. Moon, H. Park (2011)
Network of the core: mapping and visualizing the core of scientific domainsScientometrics, 89
P. Doreian, Paulette Lloyd, Andrej Mrvar (2013)
Partitioning large signed two-mode networks: Problems and prospectsSoc. Networks, 35
Peter Kristensen (2015)
Revisiting the “American Social Science”—Mapping the Geography of International RelationsInternational Studies Perspectives, 16
K. Michael, K. Miller (2013)
Big Data: New Opportunities and New Challenges [Guest editors' introduction]Computer, 46
L. Bornmann, L. Leydesdorff (2012)
Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approachesJ. Informetrics, 6
L. Leydesdorff, L. Bornmann (2011)
Integrated Impact Indicators (I3) compared with Impact Factors (IFs): An alternative research design with policy implicationsArXiv, abs/1103.5241
T. Kalil (2015)
Big data is a big deal
Hsinchun Chen, R. Chiang, V. Storey (2012)
Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big ImpactMIS Q., 36
H. Kretschmer (2004)
Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the WebScientometrics, 60
Chaomei Chen (2006)
CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literatureJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57
E. Savitz (2012)
Gartner: 10 critical tech trends for the next five years
V. Singh, S. Banshal, Khushboo Singhal, A. Uddin (2015)
Scientometric mapping of research on ‘Big Data’Scientometrics, 105
Ying Ding, G. Chowdhury, S. Foo (2001)
Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysisInf. Process. Manag., 37
T. Murdoch, A. Detsky (2013)
The inevitable application of big data to health care.JAMA, 309 13
Min Chen, S. Mao, Yunhao Liu (2014)
Big Data: A SurveyMobile Networks and Applications, 19
Sebastian Grauwin, Pablo Jensen (2011)
Mapping scientific institutionsScientometrics, 89
Hai-long Ma, C. Fang, B. Pang, Shaojian Wang (2015)
Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flowsChinese Geographical Science, 25
L. Leydesdorff, O. Persson (2010)
Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutesJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61
L. Leydesdorff, Kasper Welbers (2010)
The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contextsJ. Informetrics, 5
K. Börner, Chaomei Chen, K. Boyack (2005)
Visualizing knowledge domainsAnnu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 37
(2011)
Special online collection: dealing with big data
L. Freeman (1978)
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarificationSocial Networks, 1
Xindong Wu, Xingquan Zhu, Gongqing Wu, W. Ding (2014)
Data mining with big dataIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26
The purpose of this paper is to reveal the structure and patterns of cross-national collaborations in Big Data research through application of various social network analysis and geographical visualization methods.Design/methodology/approachThe sample includes articles containing Big Data research, covering all years, in the Web of Science Core Collection as of December 2015. First, co-occurrence data representing collaborations among nations were extracted from author affiliations. Second, the descriptive statistics, network indicators of collaborations, and research communities were calculated. Third, topological network maps, geographical maps integrated with topological network projections, and proportional maps were produced for visualization.FindingsThe results show that the scope of international collaborations in Big Data research is broad, but the distribution among nations is unbalanced and fragmented. The USA, China, and the UK were identified as the major contributors to this research area. Five research communities are identified, led by the USA, China, Italy, South Korea, and Brazil. Collaborations within each community vary, reflecting different levels of research development. The visualizations show that nations advance in Big Data research are centralized in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.Originality/valueThis study applied various informetric methods and tools to reveal the collaboration structure and patterns among nations in Big Data research. Visualized maps help shed new light on global research efforts.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2017
Keywords: Research networks; Maps; Big Data research; Geographical visualization; International collaboration; Network structure and patterns
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.