Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

Strategy and structure configurations for services within product‐centric businesses

Strategy and structure configurations for services within product‐centric businesses Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how product‐centric businesses (PCBs), operating in a business‐to‐business environment, configure their organizations to align services strategy with structure. PCBs are companies whose businesses were historically based on the products, rather than services, they sold. Design/methodology/approach – A UK‐based study was undertaken which comprised 40 interviews with managers in 25 PCBs from 11 sectors. Findings – The main parameter which determines the appropriate organizational configuration for services within the PCB's structure is strategy. A new framework is developed from the empirical research which identifies a number of PCB configurations, based on PCBs' services strategies (services engagement, extension, penetration and transformation) and organizational structures aligned to strategic business units (SBUs), i.e. combined product and services, independent services and customer‐focused. The framework is used to show how organizational structure changes in response to changes in strategy. For certain strategies, the degree of product differentiation (services engagement) and future product sales potential (services transformation) also plays a part in determining strategy/structure configurations. Research limitations/implications – Future research could confirm and compare the effectiveness of the identified structural configurations. Practical implications – Managers in PCBs can identify appropriate organizational structures based on their services strategies and products. They can configure organizational design in light of evolving strategies that enable services‐led growth. Originality/value – The paper presents a large pan‐sector study of organizational design for services as it related to PCBs, providing a new framework through which appropriate strategy/structure configurations can be identified and investigated as services‐led growth takes place. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Service Management Emerald Publishing

Strategy and structure configurations for services within product‐centric businesses

Journal of Service Management , Volume 22 (4): 18 – Aug 9, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/strategy-and-structure-configurations-for-services-within-product-XktnblhABV
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1757-5818
DOI
10.1108/09564231111155105
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how product‐centric businesses (PCBs), operating in a business‐to‐business environment, configure their organizations to align services strategy with structure. PCBs are companies whose businesses were historically based on the products, rather than services, they sold. Design/methodology/approach – A UK‐based study was undertaken which comprised 40 interviews with managers in 25 PCBs from 11 sectors. Findings – The main parameter which determines the appropriate organizational configuration for services within the PCB's structure is strategy. A new framework is developed from the empirical research which identifies a number of PCB configurations, based on PCBs' services strategies (services engagement, extension, penetration and transformation) and organizational structures aligned to strategic business units (SBUs), i.e. combined product and services, independent services and customer‐focused. The framework is used to show how organizational structure changes in response to changes in strategy. For certain strategies, the degree of product differentiation (services engagement) and future product sales potential (services transformation) also plays a part in determining strategy/structure configurations. Research limitations/implications – Future research could confirm and compare the effectiveness of the identified structural configurations. Practical implications – Managers in PCBs can identify appropriate organizational structures based on their services strategies and products. They can configure organizational design in light of evolving strategies that enable services‐led growth. Originality/value – The paper presents a large pan‐sector study of organizational design for services as it related to PCBs, providing a new framework through which appropriate strategy/structure configurations can be identified and investigated as services‐led growth takes place.

Journal

Journal of Service ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 9, 2011

Keywords: United Kingdom; Product‐centric businesses; Competitive strategy; Organizational structure

References