Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (2003)
Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes
Jan‐Erik Gröjer (2001)
Intangibles and accounting classificationsAccounting Organizations and Society, 26
C. Argyris (2002)
Teaching Smart People How to LearnReflections: The Sol Journal, 4
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (2015)
The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.Harvard business review, 70 1
Anna Rylander, K. Jacobsen, G. Roos (2000)
Towards improved information disclosure on intellectual capitalInt. J. Technol. Manag., 20
D. Gray, G. Roos, T. Rastas (2004)
What intangible resources do companies value, measure, and report? A synthesis of UK and Finnish researchInternational Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1
J. Guthrie, Richard Petty (2000)
Intellectual capital: Australian annual reporting practicesJournal of Intellectual Capital, 1
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
G. Hamel, Prahalad Ck (1989)
To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent.Harvard business review, 67 3
R.M. Grant
Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm
S. Denning (2000)
The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations
J. Mouritsen, H. Larsen, P. Bukh (2001)
Intellectual capital and the 'capable firm': narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledgeAccounting Organizations and Society, 26
J. Mouritsen, P. Bukh, B. Marr (2005)
A reporting perspective on intellectual capital
R. Grant (1996)
Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp.
C. Argyris (1996)
Double Loop Learning in Organizations
B. Marr, C. Adams (2004)
The balanced scorecard and intangible assets: similar ideas, unaligned conceptsMeasuring Business Excellence, 8
Karl-Erik Sveiby (2001)
A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF THE FIRM TO GUIDE IN STRATEGY FORMULATIONJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2
R. Grant (1991)
The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy FormulationCalifornia Management Review, 33
B. Marr, D. Gray, A. Neely (2003)
Why do firms measure their intellectual capitalJournal of Intellectual Capital, 4
J. Mouritsen, P. Bukh, C. Nielsen, M. Johansen, H. Larsen, Jens Haisler, Benedikte Stakemann (2003)
Analysing Intellectual Capital Statements
B. Lev, L. Cañibano, B. Marr (2005)
Chapter 3 – An Accounting Perspective on Intellectual Capital
S. Denning
Telling Tales
Jay Chatzkel (2003)
The collapse of Enron and the role of intellectual capitalJournal of Intellectual Capital, 4
J. Mouritsen, M. Johansen, H. Larsen, P. Bukh (2001)
Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing knowledge management strategiesJournal of Intellectual Capital, 2
Hanne Nørreklit (2003)
The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced ScorecardAccounting Organizations and Society, 28
(1949)
The Concept of Mind
C. Ittner, D. Larcker (2003)
Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement.Harvard business review, 81 11
L. Nakamura, Gerald Carlino, R. Defina (1999)
Intangibles : What Put the New in the New Economy ?
Technology and Innovation Danish Ministry of Science
Intellectual Capital Statements – The New Guidelines
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on how IT sector organizations in all five Nordic countries have worked together to start a project on using intellectual capital (IC) reporting to improve strategy formulation in SMEs in the IT sector. The project, called PIP (Putting IC into Practice), is partly funded by the Nordic Innovation Centre (www.nordicinnovation.net). Design/methodology/approach – The paper builds on the existing literature as well as the experience from the Nordic project. Findings – The objective of the project is to produce, implement and disseminate harmonized indicators for realising intangible values in companies. Results from the project include the identification of common indicators for intangible values and how they can be used as supportive evidence for IC reporting. By using these indicators with strategy maps and scorecards, the companies are provided with tools and information to improve their strategy formulation process and develop further their competitive advantage. Practical implications – The project aims to provide ways to put IC into practice as a tool for management in order to improve performance. Providing an open source framework for assisting the knowledge transformation process within companies is an important step is this respect. If successful, this will affect the management and reporting of IC. Originality/value – This paper reports on the practical application of the resource‐based view of strategy, where intangible resources play a major role in the internal development path of a company. Even though the scope is limited to SMEs in information technology in the Nordic countries, the results are of interest, especially in terms of practical value to other types of companies and industries.
Journal of Intellectual Capital – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2005
Keywords: Intellectual capital; Disclosure; Knowledge management; Small to medium‐sized enterprises
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.