Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Underlines that when decisions are strategic, they normally involve the commitment of large‐scale resources, have long‐term implications and are often difficult to reverse once taken and further points to other reasons for the importance of strategic decision‐making processes. Looks at the role of conflict, taming interpersonal conflict, and the value of eccentricity. Concludes that some degree of eccentricity must be accepted and argues it is unlikely that any techniques for encouraging expression of different views will improve the strategic decision‐making process.
The Antidote – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 1, 1998
Keywords: Strategic evaluation; Strategic management; Decision‐making
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.