Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Ellis, Arthur Bochner (2006)
Analyzing Analytic AutoethnographyJournal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35
D. Wood, J. Bruner, Gail Ross (1976)
The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 17 2
Charles Heckscher, A. Donnellon (1994)
The Post-bureaucratic organization : new perspectives on organizational change
C. Argyris (1957)
Personality and organization
R. Pea
The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity
D. Snowden, M. Boone (2007)
A leader's framework for decision makingHarvard Business Review, 85
K. Lewin
Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers
P. Adler, C. Heckscher, Adler, P., Heckscher, C.
Towards collaborative community
D. Riesman
The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character
S. Appelbaum, A. Marchionni, A. Fernández (2008)
The multi‐tasking paradox: perceptions, problems and strategiesManagement Decision, 46
J. Kokkonen, S. Paavola, Yrjö Engeström (2013)
Becoming a Swarm CatalystInt. J. Knowl. Based Organ., 3
G. Hamel
The Future of Management
K. Schwaber (1980)
Agile Project Management with Scrum
C. Ellis, Arthur Bochner (2000)
Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject
O. Brafman, Rod Beckstrom (2006)
The Starfish and the Spider
L. Anderson
Analytic autoethnography
P. Adler, Seok-Woo Kwon, Charles Heckscher (2008)
Perspective - Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative CommunityOrgan. Sci., 19
D. Riesman, N. Glazer, Reuel Denney (2017)
The Lonely Crowd
M. Seeman (1959)
On The Meaning of AlienationAmerican Sociological Review, 24
P. Adler, S.‐W. Kwon, C. Heckscher
Professional work: the emergence of collaborative community
L. Vygotsky
Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes
Heewon Chang (2008)
Autoethnography as Method
P. Adler, B. Borys (1996)
Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and CoerciveAdministrative Science Quarterly, 41
L. Vygotsky (1978)
Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press
C. Ellis, A. Bochner
Analyzing analytic autoethnography: an autopsy
Yrjö Engeström (2014)
Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research
H. Braverman (1982)
Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century
C. Heckscher, Heckscher, C., Donelleon, A.
Defining a post‐bureaucratic type
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to analyze the personal challenges of a change agent, namely, a catalyst, attempting to promote organizational change in a hybrid and complex educational organization. The study mirrors subjective experiences with classic bureaucracy research and the theory of collaborative community. It analyzes the lack of work developmental scaffolds in the transition from a bureaucracy to a collaborative community. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses autoethnographic methods. Findings – A hybrid and complex context does not offer firm scaffolds for a change agent. Classic bureaucracy research and the theory of collaborative community have difficulties to explain the personal challenges of the change agent. Research limitations/implications – Research on weak or missing organizational scaffolding and transitional challenges should be studied using a multidisciplinary approach. The concepts of the zone of proximal development and scaffolding in a complex context should be revised. Practical implications – Hybrid and complex organizations should develop new ways to scaffold and manage their work development. Originality/value – This paper shows and analyzes the personal challenges of a change agent on a hybrid and complex organization. The autoethnographic approach gives important knowledge about the lack of theoretical explanation of the problematics of organizational transition.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 8, 2014
Keywords: Autoethnography; Scaffolding; Change agent; Catalyst; Collaborative community; Complex context
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.