Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Coursey, D. Norris (2008)
Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical AssessmentPublic Administration Review, 68
D. Eadie (1983)
Putting a Powerful Tool to Practical Use: The Application of Strategic Planning in the Public SectorPublic Administration Review, 43
G. Boyne, R. Walker (2010)
Strategic Management and Public Service Performance: The Way AheadPublic Administration Review, 70
J. Bryson (1988)
A strategic planning process for public and non-profit organizationsLong Range Planning, 21
H. Hatry (2007)
Performance Measurement: Getting Results
Richard Matland (1995)
Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy ImplementationJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5
L. Holley, D. Dufner, B. Reed (2004)
STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS PLANNING IN U.S. COUNTY GOVERNMENTS : Will the Real SISP Model Please Stand Up?Public Performance & Management Review, 27
T. Poister (2010)
The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and PerformancePublic Administration Review, 70
T. Davies, W. Hale (1986)
Implementing a policy and planning process for managing state use of information technology resourcesPublic Administration Review, 46
H. Ansoff, Daniel Kipley, A. Lewis, Roxanne Helm-Stevens, Rick Ansoff (1984)
Implanting Strategic Management
Donald Calista, James Melitski, M. Holzer, A. Manoharan (2010)
Digitized Government in Worldwide Municipalities between 2003 and 2007International Journal of Public Administration, 33
J. Bryson, Frances Berry, Kaifeng Yang (2010)
The State of Public Strategic Management Research: A Selective Literature Review and Set of Future DirectionsThe American Review of Public Administration, 40
J. Kotter (2009)
Leading change: why transformation efforts failIEEE Engineering Management Review, 37
L. Holley, D. Dufner, B. Reed (2002)
Got Sisp?Public Performance & Management Review, 25
Alejandro Rodriguez, Francois Bijotat (2003)
Performance Measurement, Strategic Planning, and Performance-Based Budgeting in Illinois Local and Regional Public AirportsPublic Works Management & Policy, 8
A. Segars, V. Grover, J. Teng (1998)
Strategic Information Systems Planning: Planning System Dimensions, Internal Coalignment, and Implications for Planning EffectivenessDecision Sciences, 29
William King (1978)
Strategic Planning for Management Information SystemsMIS Q., 2
R. Kaplan (2001)
Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit OrganizationsNonprofit Management and Leadership, 11
P. Ein-Dor, E. Segev (1978)
Strategic Planning for Management Information SystemsManagement Science, 24
Frances Berry (1994)
Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic PlanningPublic Administration Review, 54
W. Burke (2002)
Organization Change: Theory and Practice
J. Bryson (2011)
Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement
Linda Lotto (1986)
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods, 8
D. Norris, C. Reddick (2013)
Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change?Public Administration Review, 73
Paul Niven (2003)
Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies
James Melitski, M. Holzer, Seang-Tae Kim, Changgil Kim, Seung-Yong Rho (2005)
Digital Government Worldwide: A e-Government Assessment of Municipal Web SitesInt. J. Electron. Gov. Res., 1
B. Thomas (1976)
Walt Disney: An American Original
Sergio Fernandez, H. Rainey (2006)
Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public SectorPublic Administration Review, 66
Donald Calista, James Melitski (2007)
E-Government and E-Governance: Converging Constructs of Public Sector Information and Communications TechnologiesPublic Administration Quarterly, 31
Donald Calista, James Melitski (2013)
Digitized Government Among Countries Worldwide From 2003 to 2010: Performance Discrepancies Explained by Comparing FrameworksInternational Journal of Public Administration, 36
Kaifeng Yang, James Melitski (2007)
Competing and Complementary Values in Information Technology Strategic Planning: Observations from Ten StatesPublic Performance & Management Review, 30
B. Bozeman, S. Bretschneider (1986)
Public management information systems: theory and prescriptionPublic Administration Review, 46
D. West (2004)
E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen AttitudesPublic Administration Review, 64
M. Moon (2002)
The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?Public Administration Review, 62
A. Ho (2002)
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government InitiativePublic Administration Review, 62
Henry Mintzberg (1993)
The rise and fall of strategic planning
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine US state strategic plans for e-government (or information technology), identify their strengths and weaknesses, and presents best practices for both practitioners and scholars interested in improving state strategic plans for information technology. Design/methodology/approach – The research analyzes the e-government strategic plans, based on a content analysis using a rubric consisting of 15 questions. Findings – The findings suggest that of the state information system plans reviewed – Michigan, Virginia, and Massachusetts are the most comprehensive. Overall, the state plans were effective in developing strategies and core beliefs, and assessing their strengths and opportunities, while less successful in recognizing weakness and threats. Research limitations/implications – This study builds on existing research examining strategic information systems plans in US states and assesses the extent to which each plan addresses established criteria for developing strategic plans. This study also attempts to fill the need for more data and empirical evidence in the development of literature in strategic planning and performance measurement. Practical implications – The research employs a public sector approach to strategic planning, and while the process is not specific to information systems it is comprehensive in its approach, grounded in literature, and offers guidance to public sector leaders in planning for investments in information systems and technology. Originality/value – The conclusion offers suggestions for both public administration practitioners and scholars interested in improving state strategic plans for information technology.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 13, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.