Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Midgley (2000)
Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice
H.J.J. Scholl
Involving salient stakeholders: beyond the technocratic view on change
R. Wolfe, D. Putler (2002)
How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups?Organ. Sci., 13
J. Mingers (1983)
Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical PhilosophyJournal of the Operational Research Society, 47
Jeff Frooman (1999)
Stakeholder Influence StrategiesAcademy of Management Review, 24
M. Clarkson (1995)
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 20
S.C. Johnson, C. Jones
How to organize for new products?
U. Weisenfeld (2003)
Engagement in Innovation Management: Perceptions and Interests in the GM Debate1Creativity and Innovation Management, 12
F. Janszen (2000)
The age of innovation : making business creativity a competence, not a coincidence
D. Quinn, T. Jones (1995)
An Agent Morality View of Business PolicyAcademy of Management Review, 20
W. Ulrich (1987)
Critical heuristics of social systems designEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 31
P. Checkland, J. Scholes (1990)
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, D. Wood (1997)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 22
R.G. Cooper, E.J. Kleinschmidt
New Products: The Key Factors in Success
T. Donaldson, L. Preston (1995)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 20
D. Wood (1991)
Corporate Social Performance RevisitedAcademy of Management Review, 16
I. Jawahar, G. Mclaughlin (2001)
Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: an Organizational Life Cycle ApproachAcademy of Management Review, 26
S. Mennin, S. Krackov (1998)
Reflections on relevance, resistance, and reform in medical educationAcademic Medicine, 73
Jane Howell (2001)
Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: key predictors of project performanceJournal of Product Innovation Management, 18
K. Goodpaster (1991)
Business Ethics and Stakeholder AnalysisBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 1
Edward Stevens, C. Churchman (1971)
The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization
Werner Ulrich (2003)
Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discourseJournal of the Operational Research Society, 54
W. Ulrich (1993)
Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holismSystems practice, 6
R. Phillips
Stakeholder legitimacy
G. Midgley (1996)
What Is This Thing Called CST
Blair Jd, White Cj (1988)
Too many on the seesaw: stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals.Hospital & health services administration, 33 2
J. Andriof, S. Waddock
Unfolding stakeholder engagement
W. Ulrich (2001)
The Quest for Competence in Systemic Research and PracticeSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 18
A. Griffin, A. Page (1996)
PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and FailureJournal of Product Innovation Management, 13
Janita Vos (2003)
Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholdersCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10
K. Goodpaster, Thomas Holloran (1994)
In Defense of a ParadoxBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 4
M. West, J. Farr (1990)
Innovation at work.
Bradley Agle, Ronald Mitchell, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld (1999)
Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo ValuesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
A. Friedman, Samantha Miles (2002)
Developing Stakeholder TheoryBusiness Policy & Strategy
Tim Rowley (1997)
Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder InfluencesAcademy of Management Review, 22
H. Scholl (2004)
Involving Salient StakeholdersAction Research, 2
B. Becker (2002)
The Alignment Conference: A Stakeholder's Way to Create a Competitive Advantage
H. Mowat, D. Mowat (2001)
The value of marginality in a medical school: general practice and curriculum change.Medical Education, 35
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
G. Pahl, W. Beitz (1984)
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
A. Ven, Douglas Polley, R. Garud, S. Venkataraman (1999)
The innovation journey
S.P. Mennin, S. Kalishman
Issues and strategies for reform in medical education: lessons from eight medical schools
Tim Rowley, M. Moldoveanu (2003)
When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest- and Identity-Based Model of Stakeholder Group MobilizationAcademy of Management Review, 28
Purpose – The management of stakeholder involvement within innovation projects is a task of growing importance. The purpose of this paper is to present a method for the first challenge in stakeholder management: the identification of those stakeholders to be involved in innovation projects. Design/methodology/approach – Analysis of stakeholder literature leads to the conclusion that stakeholder identification is considered a problem of classification. Although the availability of a classification model is necessary, it is argued that for a classification model to be of use in identifying stakeholders, such a model needs to be supplemented with an identification procedure for identifying real world parties. Furthermore, a classification model should fit the context the stakeholders are identified for, in this case for innovation projects. These insights have led to the development of a classification model fitting the innovation context, and to the embedding of this model, along with a matching identification procedure, in an identification method. Findings – A partial and integral evaluation of the method on four cases showed its efficacy in the managerial practice of identifying stakeholders within innovation projects. Originality/value – The method as proposed in the paper can be used for identifying stakeholders in innovation projects. The method can be considered a first step in managing stakeholder involvement.
European Journal of Innovation Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2006
Keywords: Stakeholder analysis; Innovation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.