Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/social-values-in-health-priority-setting-a-conceptual-framework-csSogRI1Ul
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1477-7266
- DOI
- 10.1108/14777261211238954
- pmid
- 22852453
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Purpose – It is commonly recognized that the setting of health priorities requires value judgements and that these judgements are social. Justifying social value judgements is an important element in any public justification of how priorities are set. The purpose of this paper is to review a number of social values relating both to the process and content of priority‐setting decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A set of key process and content values basic to health priority setting is outlined, and normative analysis applied to those values to identify their key features, possible interpretations in different cultural and institutional contexts, and interactions with other values. Findings – Process values are found to be closely linked, such that success in increasing, for example, transparency may depend on increasing participation or accountability, and “content” values are found often to be hidden in technical criteria. There is a complex interplay between value and technical components of priority setting, and between process and content values. Levels of economic development, culture and need will all play a part in determining how different systems balance the values in their decisions. Originality/value – Technical analyses of health priority setting are commonplace, but approaching the issues from the perspective of social values is a more recent approach and one which this paper seeks to refine and develop.
Journal
Journal of Health Organisation and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 15, 2012
Keywords: Social values; Health organisation and management; Decision making; Health priority setting
Recommended Articles
Loading...
References
-
Pharmacoeconomic guidelines and their implementation in the positive list system in South KoreaBae, E.; Lee, E.
-
Principles of Biomedical EthicsBeauchamp, T.L.; Childress, J.F.
-
Decisions on inclusion in the Swedish basic health care package: roles of cost‐effectiveness and needBernfort, L.
-
Consulting the public about health service prioritiesBowie, C.; Richardson, A.; Sykes, W.
-
Health care rationing: the public's debateBowling, A.
-
Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approachCappelen, A.; Norheim, O.
-
Comparative effectiveness research and evidence‐based health policy: experience from four countriesChalkidou, K.; Tunis, S.; Lopert, R.; Rochaix, L.; Sawicki, P.T.; Nasser, M.; Xerri, B.
-
Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE's decisionsClaxton, K.; Culyer, A.J.
-
Principles of justice in health care rationingCookson, R.; Dolan, P.
-
Direct public and patient involvement in rationingCoote, A.
-
Equity: some theory and its policy implicationsCulyer, A.
-
Alternative systems of health care provision: an essay on motes and beamsCulyer, A.J.; Maynard, A.K.; Williams, A.H.
-
Accountability for reasonableness in private and public health insuranceDaniels, N.
-
Benchmarks of fairness for health care reform: a policy tool for developing countriesDaniels, N.
-
The elicitation of distributional judgements in the context of economic evaluationDolan, P.; Tsuchiya, A.
-
QALY maximization and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literatureDolan, P.; Shaw, R.; Tsuchiya, A.; Williams, A.
-
Public participation and the moral quality of healthcare rationingDoyal, L.
-
What is accountability in healthcare?Emmanuel, E.; Emmanuel, L.
-
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to SelfFeinberg, J.
-
Trust and the development of health care as a social institutionGilson, L.
-
Why Deliberative Democracy?Gutmann, A.; Thompson, D.
-
Setting healthcare priorities in Oregon: cost effectiveness meets the rule of rescueHadorn, D.
-
Key concepts in health care priority settingHoedemaekers, R.; Dekkers, W.
-
Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the publicJordan, J.; Dowsell, T.; Harrison, S.; Lilford, R.J.; Mort, M.
-
An ethical analysis of international health priority settingKenny, N.; Joffres, C.
-
Redressing disadvantage: promoting vertical equity within South AfricaMcIntyre, D.; Gilson, L.
-
Participation in health care priority‐setting through the eyes of participantsMartin, D.; Abelson, J.; Singer, P.
-
Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationingMechanic, D.
-
Strong MedicineMenzel, P.
-
Antipodean assessment: activities, actions and achievementsMitchell, A.
-
Patients first: the role of rightsMontgomery, J.
-
What does equity in health mean?Mooney, G.
-
Healthcare users, the public and the consultation industryMort, M.; Harrison, S.
-
Social Value Judgements: Principles for the Development of NICE GuidanceNational Institute for Clinical Excellence
-
How we workNational Institute for Clinical Excellence
-
The significance of age and duration of effect in social evaluation of healthcareNord, E.; Street, A.; Richardson, J.; Kuhse, H.; Singer, P.
-
On the Nature of Health: An Action Theoretic ApproachNordenfelt, L.
-
Equity in Health and HealthcareOliver, A. (Ed.)
-
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventionsPersad, G.; Wertheimer, A.; Emanuel, E.
-
Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health PolicyPowers, M.; Faden, R.
-
NICE and its social value judgementsRawlins, M.; Culyer, A.
-
Improving access to medicines for NHS patients: a report to the Secretary of State for HealthRichards, M.
-
The social value of health programmes: is age a relevant factor?Rodriguez, E.; Pinto, J.
-
Legal language and social change during Colombia's economic crisisRueda, P.
-
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniquesRyan, M.; Scott, D.; Reeves, C.; Bate, A.; van Teijlingen, E.; Russell, E.; Napper, M.; Robb, C.
-
European Health Care Reform: Analysis of Current StrategiesSaltman, B.; Figueras, J.
-
Conceptualizing accountabilitySchedler, A.
-
Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidenceSchwappach, D.
-
Strengthening cost‐effectiveness analysis in Thailand through the establishment of the Health Interventional and Technology ProgramTantivess, S.; Teerawattanon, Y.; Mills, A.
-
Cost and Choice in HealthcareWeale, A.
-
Co‐payments in the NHSWeale, A.; Clark, S.
-
Fairness and Goodness in HealthWikler, D. (Ed.)
-
Economics of coronary bypass graftingWilliams, A.
-
Ethics and efficiency in the provision of healthcareWilliams, A.
-
Economics and the rational use of medical technologyWilliams, A.H.
-
Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from AustraliaWiseman, V.; Mooney, G.; Berry, G.; Tang, K.
@Phil_Robichaud
@deepthiw
@JoseServera