Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Fricke, H. Dauben (2009)
Health technology assessment: a perspective from Germany.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12 Suppl 2
M. Pfaff
Germany: evidence, policy, and politics in health care reform
B. Jönsson (2008)
IQWiG: an opportunity lost?The European Journal of Health Economics, 9
A. Coulter, C. Ham (2000)
The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
Struktur und Mitglieder
M. Simon
Das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland: Eine Einfuehrung in Struktur und Funktionsweise
S. Clark
Draft framework of analysis for social values and health priority setting
Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
Solidaritaet
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
General methods for the assessment of the relation of benefits to costs
P. Hall (1989)
The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations
J. Hoppe
Verteilungsgerechtigkeit durch Priorisierung – Patientenwohl in Zeiten der Mangelware
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Suchergebnisse: Kosten‐Nutzen‐Bewertung
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Reliable information, improved health care
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
Allgemeine Methoden
S. Giaimo, P. Manow
The case of health care reform in Britain, Germany and the United States
Aerzteblatt.de
Bahr erteilt Medizin nach Ranglisten klare Absage
Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
Glossarbegriff: Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
Pharmazeutische Zeitung
BPI hat nichts gegen Medikationskatalog
Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung
S. Giaimo, P. Manow (1999)
Adapting the Welfare StateComparative Political Studies, 32
Melanie Lisac, Lutz Reimers, K. Henke, Sophia Schlette (2010)
Access and choice – competition under the roof of solidarity in German health care: an analysis of health policy reforms since 2004Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5
P. Mph (2010)
Ethische Grundlagen der Priorisierung im GesundheitswesenBundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 53
M. Drummond, F. Rutten
New guidelines for economic evaluation in Germany and the United Kingdom: are we any closer to international standards?
Claudia Landwehr (2009)
DECIDING HOW TO DECIDE: THE CASE OF HEALTH CARE RATIONINGPublic Administration, 87
J. Caro, E. Nord, U. Siebert, A. Mcguire, M. Mcgregor, D. Henry, G. Pouvourville, V. Atella, P. Kolominsky-Rabas (2010)
The efficiency frontier approach to economic evaluation of health-care interventions.Health economics, 19 10
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of health priority setting structures in Germany. It reflects on how and which social values may influence decision making, and in particular investigates the role of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) in integrating evidence‐based decision making into the German system. Design/methodology/approach – The paper applies Clark and Weale's framework of analysis for Social Values and Health Priority Setting to the German context. Placing German health care decision making into Clark and Weale's framework allows for an analysis of the role and content of social values in different dimensions of decision making. Findings – Germany has witnessed significant changes in its health care decision‐making procedures in recent decades. The establishment of the Institute of Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) represents an effort to introduce health technology assessment (HTA) as a formal element of decision making in health care. In doing so, Germany has made unique methodological and structural choices that reflect the social values and institutional traditions that underpin its self‐governing statutory health insurance (SHI) system. The empirical evidence suggests that the principle of solidarity is upheld as a core value in health priority setting in Germany. Originality/value – The German case of health priority setting highlights some of the challenges involved when introducing centralised HTA structures to a self‐governing SHI system. As such, this paper contributes to an understanding of the different forms that HTA can take, what social values they embody and how they can affect health priority setting in different ways.
Journal of Health Organisation and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 15, 2012
Keywords: Germany; Health care; Social values; Health priority setting; IQWiG; Health technology assessment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.