Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Social values and health priority setting in Germany

Social values and health priority setting in Germany Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of health priority setting structures in Germany. It reflects on how and which social values may influence decision making, and in particular investigates the role of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) in integrating evidence‐based decision making into the German system. Design/methodology/approach – The paper applies Clark and Weale's framework of analysis for Social Values and Health Priority Setting to the German context. Placing German health care decision making into Clark and Weale's framework allows for an analysis of the role and content of social values in different dimensions of decision making. Findings – Germany has witnessed significant changes in its health care decision‐making procedures in recent decades. The establishment of the Institute of Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) represents an effort to introduce health technology assessment (HTA) as a formal element of decision making in health care. In doing so, Germany has made unique methodological and structural choices that reflect the social values and institutional traditions that underpin its self‐governing statutory health insurance (SHI) system. The empirical evidence suggests that the principle of solidarity is upheld as a core value in health priority setting in Germany. Originality/value – The German case of health priority setting highlights some of the challenges involved when introducing centralised HTA structures to a self‐governing SHI system. As such, this paper contributes to an understanding of the different forms that HTA can take, what social values they embody and how they can affect health priority setting in different ways. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Health Organisation and Management Emerald Publishing

Social values and health priority setting in Germany

Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/social-values-and-health-priority-setting-in-germany-bJlYN2VPsM
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7266
DOI
10.1108/14777261211239016
pmid
22852459
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of health priority setting structures in Germany. It reflects on how and which social values may influence decision making, and in particular investigates the role of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) in integrating evidence‐based decision making into the German system. Design/methodology/approach – The paper applies Clark and Weale's framework of analysis for Social Values and Health Priority Setting to the German context. Placing German health care decision making into Clark and Weale's framework allows for an analysis of the role and content of social values in different dimensions of decision making. Findings – Germany has witnessed significant changes in its health care decision‐making procedures in recent decades. The establishment of the Institute of Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) represents an effort to introduce health technology assessment (HTA) as a formal element of decision making in health care. In doing so, Germany has made unique methodological and structural choices that reflect the social values and institutional traditions that underpin its self‐governing statutory health insurance (SHI) system. The empirical evidence suggests that the principle of solidarity is upheld as a core value in health priority setting in Germany. Originality/value – The German case of health priority setting highlights some of the challenges involved when introducing centralised HTA structures to a self‐governing SHI system. As such, this paper contributes to an understanding of the different forms that HTA can take, what social values they embody and how they can affect health priority setting in different ways.

Journal

Journal of Health Organisation and Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 15, 2012

Keywords: Germany; Health care; Social values; Health priority setting; IQWiG; Health technology assessment

References

  • Bahr erteilt Medizin nach Ranglisten klare Absage
    Aerzteblatt.de
  • Gesetzliche Krankenversicherung
    Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
  • Solidaritaet
    Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
  • Glossarbegriff: Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
    Bundesministerium fuer Gesundheit
  • The efficiency frontier approach to economic evaluation of health‐care interventions
    Caro, J.J.; Nord, E.; Siebert, U.; McGuire, A.; McGregor, M.; Henry, D.; de Puvourville, G.; Attela, V.; Kolominsky‐Rabas, P.
  • Draft framework of analysis for social values and health priority setting
    Clark, S.
  • The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
    Coulter, A.; Ham, C. (Eds)
  • New guidelines for economic evaluation in Germany and the United Kingdom: are we any closer to international standards?
    Drummond, M.; Rutten, F.
  • Health technology assessment: a perspective from Germany
    Fricke, F.U.; Dauben, H.P.
  • Struktur und Mitglieder
    Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss
  • The case of health care reform in Britain, Germany and the United States
    Giaimo, S.; Manow, P.
  • The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations
    Hall, P.A.
  • Verteilungsgerechtigkeit durch Priorisierung – Patientenwohl in Zeiten der Mangelware
    Hoppe, J.
  • Suchergebnisse: Kosten‐Nutzen‐Bewertung
    Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
  • General methods for the assessment of the relation of benefits to costs
    Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
  • Allgemeine Methoden
    Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
  • Reliable information, improved health care
    Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care
  • IQWiG: an opportunity lost?
    Joensson, B.
  • Deciding how to decide: the case of health care rationing
    Landwehr, C.
  • Access and choice – competition under the roof of solidarity in German health care: an analysis of health policy reforms since 2004
    Lisac, M.; Reimers, L.; Henke, K.; Schlette, S.
  • Ethische Grundlagen der Priorisierung im Gesundheitswesen
    Marckmann, G.
  • Germany: evidence, policy, and politics in health care reform
    Pfaff, M.
  • BPI hat nichts gegen Medikationskatalog
    Pharmazeutische Zeitung
  • Das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland: Eine Einfuehrung in Struktur und Funktionsweise
    Simon, M.