Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Scott Tonidandel, James LeBreton (2013)
Beyond step-down analysis: a new test for decomposing the importance of dependent variables in MANOVA.The Journal of applied psychology, 98 3
(2009)
SHRM poll: interviewing do’s and don’ts for job seekers
Donald Kluemper, Peter Rosen, K. Mossholder (2012)
Social Networking Websites, Personality Ratings, and the Organizational Context: More Than Meets the Eye?1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42
Michael Marks, R. Fraley (2006)
Confirmation Bias and the Sexual Double StandardSex Roles, 54
John Skowronski, D. Carlston (1989)
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.Psychological Bulletin, 105
H. Davison, Catherine Maraist, M. Bing (2011)
Friend or Foe? The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Social Networking Sites for HR DecisionsJournal of Business and Psychology, 26
D. Kreager, Jeremy Staff (2009)
The Sexual Double Standard and Adolescent Peer AcceptanceSocial Psychology Quarterly, 72
(2016)
Applicants’ information privacy protection responses following human resource departments’ requests to access social media
D. Cable, Thomas Gilovich (1998)
Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and postinterview evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
Gregory Park, H. Schwartz, J. Eichstaedt, Margaret Kern, Michal Kosinskihttps://www.semanticscholar.org/me/account, D. Stillwell, L. Ungar, M. Seligman (2015)
Automatic personality assessment through social media language.Journal of personality and social psychology, 108 6
S. Crampton, J. Wagner (1994)
Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and EffectJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
P. Roth, P. Bobko, Chad Iddekinge, J. Thatcher (2016)
Social Media in Employee-Selection-Related DecisionsJournal of Management, 42
William Smith, Deborah Kidder (2010)
You've been tagged! (Then again, maybe not): Employers and FacebookBusiness Horizons, 53
L. Bolton, Liesl Becker, Larissa Barber (2010)
Big Five trait predictors of differential counterproductive work behavior dimensionsPersonality and Individual Differences, 49
M. Snyder, W. Ickes (1985)
Personality and social behavior
Victoria Brown, Victoria Brown, E. Vaughn (2011)
The Writing on the (Facebook) Wall: The Use of Social Networking Sites in Hiring DecisionsJournal of Business and Psychology, 26
Scott Tonidandel, James LeBreton, Jeff Johnson (2009)
Determining the statistical significance of relative weights.Psychological methods, 14 4
B. Brown, M. Campion (1994)
Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters' perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
L. Clark, S. Roberts (2010)
Employer’s Use of Social Networking Sites: A Socially Irresponsible PracticeJournal of Business Ethics, 95
Paul Spector, S. Fox, Lisa Penney, Kari Bruursema, Angeline Goh, Stacey Kessler (2006)
The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68
S. Gosling, S. Ko, Thomas Mannarelli, M. Morris (2002)
A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms.Journal of personality and social psychology, 82 3
Shelley Taylor (1991)
Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis.Psychological bulletin, 110 1
Michael Cole, H. Feild, W. Giles (2003)
What can we uncover about applicants based on their resumes? A field study
Debora Jeske, K. Shultz (2019)
Social media screening and content effects: implications for job applicant reactionsInternational Journal of Manpower
Michael Cole, R. Rubin, H. Feild, W. Giles (2007)
Recruiters’ Perceptions and Use of Applicant Résumé Information: Screening the Recent GraduateApplied Psychology, 56
C. Huberty, John Morris (1989)
Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses.Psychological Bulletin, 105
Review of General Psychology, 5
Paul Spector, S. Fox (2005)
The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behavior.
D. Carlston (1980)
The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16
Guido Peeters, Janusz Czapiński (1990)
Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity EffectsEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 1
Michael Cole, H. Feild, W. Giles, S. Harris (2009)
Recruiters’ Inferences of Applicant Personality Based on Resume Screening: Do Paper People have a Personality?Journal of Business and Psychology, 24
D. Buss (1987)
Selection, evocation, and manipulation.Journal of personality and social psychology, 53 6
D. Ones (2002)
Introduction to the Special Issue on Counterproductive Behaviors at WorkInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10
M. Back, Juliane Stopfer, S. Vazire, S. Gaddis, S. Schmukle, B. Egloff, S. Gosling (2010)
Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-IdealizationPsychological Science, 21
J. Stoughton, L. Thompson, A. Meade (2013)
Big Five Personality Traits Reflected in Job Applicants' Social Media PostingsCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 16 11
R. Milhausen, E. Herold (1999)
Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university womenJournal of Sex Research, 36
J. Becton, H. Walker, Paul Schwager, J. Gilstrap (2019)
Is what you see what you get? Investigating the relationship between social media content and counterproductive work behaviors, alcohol consumption, and episodic heavy drinkingThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30
J. Smith (2012)
Make social media your job-finding weapon
Wei-Chi Tsai, Chien‐Cheng Chen, Su-fen Chiu (2005)
Exploring Boundaries of the Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics in Job InterviewsJournal of Management, 31
B. Bolster, B. Springbett (1961)
The reaction of interviewers to favorable and unfavorable information.Journal of Applied Psychology, 45
Debora Jeske, K. Shultz (2016)
Using social media content for screening in recruitment and selection: pros and consWork, Employment & Society, 30
Bookauthor (1940)
Research MethodsTeachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 42
K. Gurchiek (2014)
How social media content hurts job seekers
N. Ollington, Jenny Gibb, M. Harcourt (2013)
Online social networks: an emergent recruiter tool for attracting and screeningPersonnel Review, 42
S. Fiske (1980)
Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38
Tiffany Ito, Jeff Larsen, N. Smith, J. Cacioppo (1998)
Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 75 4
Donald Davis (2007)
Myspace Isn't Your Space: Expanding the Fair Credit Reporting Act to Ensure Accountability and Fairness in Employer Searches of Online Social Networking Services
D. Cable, T. Judge (1997)
Interviewers' perceptions of persons-organization fit and organizational selection decisions.The Journal of applied psychology, 82 4
Frances Bolton (1990)
Case Western Reserve University
B.A. Campbell (2008)
Choose your online friends wisely
James LeBreton, Scott Tonidandel (2008)
Multivariate relative importance: extending relative weight analysis to multivariate criterion spaces.The Journal of applied psychology, 93 2
T. Chartrand, J. Bargh (1996)
Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task InstructionsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71
Adam Kanar, C. Collins, B. Bell (2010)
A Comparison of the Effects of Positive and Negative Information on Job Seekers' Organizational Attraction and Attribute RecallHuman Performance, 23
(2012)
Social network screening of employees can make organizations unattractive to applicants
H. Davison, M. Burke (2000)
Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic InvestigationJournal of Vocational Behavior, 56
B. Kowske, M. Southwell (2006)
E-screening proves ‘e-resistable’: but at what cost?
Janneke Hoek, P. O’Kane, M. McCracken (2016)
Publishing personal information online: How employers’ access, observe and utilise social networking sites within selection proceduresPersonnel Review, 45
Donald Kluemper, Peter Rosen (2009)
Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sitesJournal of Managerial Psychology, 24
J. Wortham (2009)
More employers use social networks to check out applicants
Graham Scott, Jason Sinclair, E. Short, G. Bruce (2014)
It's Not What You Say, It's How You Say It: Language Use on Facebook Impacts Employability But Not AttractivenessCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 17 8
W. Swann (1987)
Identity negotiation: where two roads meet.Journal of personality and social psychology, 53 6
Chad Iddekinge, Stephen Lanivich, P. Roth, Elliott Junco (2016)
Social Media for Selection? Validity and Adverse Impact Potential of a Facebook-Based AssessmentJournal of Management, 42
J. Grasz (2013)
More employers finding reasons not to hire candidates on social media, finds CareerBuilder survey
J. Grasz (2009)
Forty-five percent of employers use social networking sites to research job candidates
(2013)
Social recruiting survey results
S. Rolando, G. Taddeo, Franca Beccaria (2016)
New media and old stereotypes. Images and discourses about drunk women and men on YouTubeJournal of Gender Studies, 25
J. Peluchette, K. Karl (2007)
The prevalence of Facebook faux pas and students’ ‘devil may care’ attitudes
Youyou Wu, Michal Kosinskihttps://www.semanticscholar.org/me/account, D. Stillwell (2015)
Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humansProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112
Christopher Ballweg, William Ross, D. Secchi, Chad Uting (2018)
The influence of managers’ social networking information on job applicantsEvidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how HR professionals use social networking website information to evaluate applicants’ propensity to engage in counterproductive work behaviors and suitability for hire.Design/methodology/approachUsing an experimental design, 354 HR professionals participated in a two-part study. In part 1, participants viewed a fictitious resume and rated the applicant’s likelihood to engage in counterproductive work behavior as well as likelihood of a hiring recommendation. In part 2, participants viewed a fictitious social networking website profile for the applicant and repeated the ratings from part 1. The authors analyzed their responses to determine the effect viewing a social network website (SNW) profile had on ratings of the applicant.FindingsUnprofessional SNW information negatively affected ratings of applicants regardless of applicants’ qualifications, while professional SNW profile information failed to improve evaluations regardless of qualifications.Originality/valueAnecdotal reports suggest that many employers use SNW information to eliminate job applicants from consideration despite an absence of empirical research that has examined how SNW content influences HR recruiters’ evaluation of job applicants. This study represents one of the first attempts to understand how HR professionals use such information in screening applicants. The findings suggest that unprofessional SNW profiles negatively influence recruiter evaluations while professional SNW profile content has little to no effect on evaluations.
Personnel Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 22, 2019
Keywords: Social media; Selection; Facebook; Recruiting; Counterproductive work behaviour; Social networking websites
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.