Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Social economy as political practice

Social economy as political practice Within the current climate of rapacious neo‐liberal economic expansion and increasingly globalized public protest, the social economy tradition has again emerged as an important nodal point for practical and theoretical socio‐economic debate and action. However, as recent scholarship makes clear, there is no clear consensus on what this phrase means or the social and political role that this sector of society should play, given current conditions. This paper suggests an answer to both of these questions by focusing on and reworking the “radical/Utopian” stream of theorizing within the social economy discourse. It concludes that, unless the social economy movement recognizes the importance of reintegrating a “life‐world” politics into its economic vision, it will increasingly be used by government as the low‐ or no‐cost alternative to state‐funded social welfare. If this is allowed to happen the social economy will be relegated to an unofficial support/monitoring branch of government/neo‐liberal economic restructuring and, consequently, it will perpetuate the conditions which it has always been envisioned to challenge. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Social Economics Emerald Publishing

Social economy as political practice

J.J. McMurtry
International Journal of Social Economics , Volume 31 (9): 11 – Sep 1, 2004
Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/social-economy-as-political-practice-ui9alc9emO

References (11)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0306-8293
DOI
10.1108/03068290410550656
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Within the current climate of rapacious neo‐liberal economic expansion and increasingly globalized public protest, the social economy tradition has again emerged as an important nodal point for practical and theoretical socio‐economic debate and action. However, as recent scholarship makes clear, there is no clear consensus on what this phrase means or the social and political role that this sector of society should play, given current conditions. This paper suggests an answer to both of these questions by focusing on and reworking the “radical/Utopian” stream of theorizing within the social economy discourse. It concludes that, unless the social economy movement recognizes the importance of reintegrating a “life‐world” politics into its economic vision, it will increasingly be used by government as the low‐ or no‐cost alternative to state‐funded social welfare. If this is allowed to happen the social economy will be relegated to an unofficial support/monitoring branch of government/neo‐liberal economic restructuring and, consequently, it will perpetuate the conditions which it has always been envisioned to challenge.

Journal

International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 1, 2004

Keywords: Social market economy; Co‐operative organizations; Marxist economics

There are no references for this article.