Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Burgess (2011)
New Principles of Best Practice in Clinical Audit
Christopher Moberg, T. Speh, Thomas Freese (2003)
SCM: MAKING THE VISION A REALITYSupply Chain Management Review
Natalie Sproull (1988)
Handbook of Research Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Sciences
Heeseok Lee, Byounggu Choi (2003)
Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical ExaminationJournal of Management Information Systems, 20
D. Wastell, P. White, P. Kawalek (1994)
A methodology for business process redesign: experiences and issuesJ. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 3
S. Sarantakos
Social Research
J. Champy (2002)
X-Engineering the Corporation: Reinventing Your Business in the Digital Age
A. Tiwana
The Knowledge Management Toolkit
C.R. Troyer
Smart movers in supply chain coordination
david. spiegelhalter (2002)
Review of e Clinical Governance: A Guide for Primary CareQuality and Safety in Health Care, 11
S. McLaughlin (2009)
Improving Supply Chain Performance through the Implementation of Process Related Knowledge Transfer MechanismsInt. J. Knowl. Manag., 5
S. McLaughlin, R. Paton, D. Macbeth (2008)
Barrier impact on organizational learning within complex organizationsJ. Knowl. Manag., 12
O. Williams (1996)
What is clinical audit?Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 78 5
R. Maull, A. Weaver, S. Childe, P. Smar, J. Bennett (1995)
Current issues in business process re‐engineeringInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15
A. Marwick (2001)
Knowledge management technologyIBM Syst. J., 40
S. Rajiv
Making a good thing better
J. Swart, N. Kinnie (2003)
Sharing knowledge in knowledge-intensive firmsHuman Resource Management Journal, 13
J. Brown, P. Duguid (2000)
Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it.Harvard business review, 78 3
Gerald Albuam, A. Oppenheim (1992)
Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement
Thomas Brush (1996)
PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSESStrategic Management Journal, 17
Sandra Moffett, R. McAdam, M. Murphy, G. Patterson (1998)
Creating the Knowledge-Based Business
H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, S. Whang
The bullwhip effect in supply chains
Morten Hansen, N. Nohria, T. Tierney (1999)
What's your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard business review, 77 2
D. Amaratunga, D. Baldry (2001)
Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisationsWork Study, 50
D. Walters, G. Lancaster (2000)
Implementing value strategy through the value chainManagement Decision, 38
J. Spender (1996)
Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theoryJournal of Organizational Change Management, 9
S. McLaughlin, R.A. Paton, D.K. Macbeth
Identifying barriers that impact knowledge creation and transfer within complex organisations
C. Chandra, Sameer Kumar (2000)
Supply chain management in theory and practice: a passing fad or a fundamental change?Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 100
D. Teece (1998)
Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible AssetsCalifornia Management Review, 40
H. Lee, B. Choi
KM enablers, processes, and organisational performance: an integrative view and empirical examination
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
D. Amaratunga, D. Baldry
Case study methodology as a means of theory building
R. McDermott (1999)
Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge ManagementCalifornia Management Review, 41
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
E. Wenger (2000)
Communities of Practice and Social Learning SystemsOrganization, 7
T. Swage
Clinical Governance in Healthcare Practice
A. Weele (1999)
Purchasing and supply chain management
L. Argote, P. Ingram (2000)
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMSOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82
S. McLaughlin, R. Paton (2008)
Defining a knowledge strategy framework for process aligned organizations: an IBM caseKnowledge and Process Management, 15
A. Gupta, S. Michailova
Knowledge sharing in knowledge intensive firms
P. Smart, R. Maull, S. Childe (1999)
A reference model of 'operate' processes for process-based changeInt. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 12
R. Stake (1995)
The art of case study research
H. Tsoukas
The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructivist approach
M. Hammer, J. Champy
Re‐engineering the Corporation
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to identify common traits amongst complex, knowledge‐intensive organizations in their approach to managing their core business processes in a way that maximises knowledge transfer along these processes. Design/methodology/approach – The research follows an empirically‐based multiple case study approach across six national/multi‐national knowledge‐based organizations. A core‐complex process was identified within each organization, and key employees along the respective process where interviewed concerning the manner in which the processes were managed and modified. Findings – Those organizations that identified their core business processes as being responsive and flexible could be shown to adopt common traits in their approach to ensuring continued performance related knowledge transfer. However, those that had less‐responsive processes seemed to share similar issues; failure to align their knowledge strategy to their process development and failure to engage end‐users throughout the process life cycle. Research limitations/implications – The findings are based on a limited sample size of six organizations, and the nature of the findings are presented in an inductive‐theory building way. Therefore, the findings are not presented as a final position, but as a starting point for further research into complex, knowledge transfer intensive business process development and design. Practical implications – From the findings, six tenets that all of the more successful organizations follow. Originality/value – Within any dynamic organization core business processes are under pressure to perform within a constantly changing business environment. These processes can be viewed as knowledge‐pathway, therefore, it is important to understand how an organization can continue to re‐shape processes in a way that continues to support performance related knowledge transfer.
VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 18, 2010
Keywords: Knowledge transfer; Process management; Innovation; Supply chain management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.