Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Karakurt, G. Aydin (2022)
Development of regression models to forecast the CO2 emissions from fossil fuels in the BRICS and MINT countriesEnergy
K. Bäckstrand, Jonathan Kuyper, B. Linnér, Eva Lövbrand (2017)
Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyondEnvironmental Politics, 26
S. Suri (2023)
It's Time for Climate Justice- A Global South Perspective on the Fight against the Climate Crisis
(2023)
Coal exports by country
(2023)
Total greenhouse gas emissions
(2023)
8 consequential energy implications of the BRICS expansion
M. Megre (2020)
BRICS Energy Policies and Strategies in Response to Climate Change, 6
O. Geden (2023)
Knowledge Politics in the Context of International Climate Negotiations
(2021)
Six reasons why the EU isn't as green as it claims
(2023)
CO-emission performance standards and reporting obligations for new heavy-duty vehicles. EU Legislation in Progress
Christoph Böhringer (2003)
The Kyoto Protocol: A Review and PerspectivesOxford Review of Economic Policy, 19
Timothy Afful-Koomson (2015)
The Green Climate Fund in Africa: what should be different?Climate and Development, 7
G. Baskaran, B. Cahill (2023)
Six new brics: implications for energy trade, CSIS
M. Kok, J. Gyapong, I. Wolffers, D. Ofori-Adjei, E. Ruitenberg (2017)
Towards fair and effective North–South collaboration: realising a programme for demand-driven and locally led researchHealth Research Policy and Systems, 15
C. Rhodes (2016)
The 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference: Cop21Science Progress, 99
J. Boyce (2004)
Green and Brown? Globalization and the environmentOxford Review of Economic Policy, 20
(2023)
The world's greenest countries
C. Fetting (2020)
‘The European Green Deal’, ESDN Report, December 2020
C.D. Plessis, A. Miridzhanian, B. Acharya (2023)
BRICS welcomes new members in push to reshuffle World Order, Reuters
Statista (2023b)
Energy and Environment: share of renewable sources in internal electricity supply in Brazil from 2013 to 2021
SWP Comment
R. Leal-Arcas (2013)
Climate Change and International Trade
(2023)
Renewable energy targets
F. Richer (2023)
BRICS expands footprint in the Global South
C. Grosse, Brigid Mark (2020)
A colonized COP: Indigenous exclusion and youth climate justice activism at the United Nations climate change negotiationsJournal of Human Rights and the Environment
(2022)
How climate colonialism affects the Global South
Yuling Pan, Fengna Dong (2023)
Factor substitution and development path of the new energy market in the BRICS countries under carbon neutrality: Inspirations from developed European countriesApplied Energy
E. Brown, Jonathan Cloke, D. Gent, Paul Johnson, Chloe Hill (2014)
Green growth or ecological commodification: debating the green economy in the global southGeografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96
(2023)
Green economy
M. Ahmed, C. Shuai (2022)
Analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions trend in China, India, the USA, and RussiaInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20
Jingjing Chen, F. Yang, Yicen Liu, Ahmed Usman (2022)
The asymmetric effect of technology shocks on CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of BRICS economiesEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research
Statista (2023a)
Energy and Environment: investments in energy transition worldwide in 2022, by leading country
D. South (2023)
COP27 Loss and Damage Fund—Financial Band Aid or Effective Mechanism?Climate and Energy
(2023)
GHG emissions in the EU - statistics and facts
J. Peel, H. Osofsky, A. Foerster (2017)
Shaping the 'Next Generation' of Climate Change Litigation in AustraliaMelbourne University Law Review, 41
I. Radulescu, M. Panait, Cătălin Voica (2014)
BRICS Countries Challenge to the World Economy New TrendsProcedia. Economics and finance, 8
The new additions to Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) expand into the broader Middle East and North Africa region, adding some of the largest populations and strongest economies of the region to BRICS+. Since the BRICS summit in August 2023, significant media attention has been given to the impacts of these shifting geopolitical sands, from the potential for de-dollarization processes, and the distribution of resource reserves for influencing markets. Conference of the Parties (COP) 28 presents an opportunity for these emerging economies (BRICS+) to assert their role in addressing the global climate crisis and push for more equitable and effective solutions. However, only little has been explored on how the new BRICS+ alignment will influence climate negotiations at COP 28 and the sustainability transition more broadly. This perspective article explores what the changes to BRICS+ mean for COP 28 and the relevance of COP 28 being hosted in a BRICS+ member country.Design/methodology/approachIn crafting this perspective paper on BRICS+, the authors' methodology primarily entails a comprehensive review of existing literature, policy documents and academic analyses related to the BRICS+, as well as the examination of official statements, declarations and policy shifts from BRICS+ member countries to gauge their intentions and priorities within this expanded framework. The authors also monitor developments leading up to COP 28 to provide real-time insights into how BRICS+ dynamics shape climate negotiations.FindingsThe authors' perspective article puts forth a number of insights. First, the BRICS+ member countries are prominent players in global geopolitics. Their involvement in COP 28 could lead to climate negotiations being intertwined with broader geopolitical issues, potentially impacting the pace and direction of climate agreements. Second, COP 28 offers a critical opportunity to bridge the divide between developed and developing nations in the realm of climate action and sustainable development. The BRICS+ countries may, in this COP event, explore options beyond the traditional intergovernmental institutions, which often reflect the influence, hegemony and power dynamics of the Global North. This includes South–South collaboration, bilateral financial support, innovative financing and direct trade. Finally, agendas related to capacity building in this coming event will be a critical component of the global climate change agenda in a way that develops South–South dialogs for climate change adaptation and mitigation.Originality/valueThe authors' research sheds light on the implications of this expansion for climate negotiations, a critical global concern. It delves into uncharted territory by examining how the BRICS+ alignment may influence climate initiatives, which has not been thoroughly explored in existing literature. This comprehensive perspective fills a critical gap in the current discourse, providing policymakers and scholars with a more holistic understanding of the implications of BRICS+ for the global agenda on sustainability. Moreover, the research offers real-time insights by monitoring developments leading up to and during COP 28, allowing for timely analysis and informed recommendations. This aspect of the research provides immediate value to stakeholders engaged in climate negotiations and international relations.
Management & Sustainability An Arab Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 6, 2024
Keywords: Climate change; COP 28; Global North; Global South; The new BRICS
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.