Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ruffner Hall, B. Bass (2015)
Bass Stogdill's Handbook Of Leadership
C. Trinidad, Anthony Normore (2005)
Leadership and gender: a dangerous liaison?Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26
A. Edmondson (1999)
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work TeamsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
D. Katz, R. Kahn (1966)
The Social Psychology of Organizations
Miriam Muethel, Sarah Gehrlein, M. Hoegl (2012)
Socio‐demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource managementHuman Resource Management, 51
L. Anderson, P. Blanchard (1982)
Sex differences in task and social-emotional behavior.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3
Ajay Mehra, B. Smith, A. Dixon, Bruce Robertson (2006)
Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance.Leadership Quarterly, 17
Julia Hoch, C. Pearce, Linda Welzel (2010)
Is the most effective team leadership shared? The impact of shared leadership, age diversity, and coordination on team performance.Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9
A. Eagly (2005)
Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?Leadership Quarterly, 16
R. House (1996)
Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theoryLeadership Quarterly, 7
M. Heilman, Caryn Block, R. Martell, Michael Simon (1989)
Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
R. Lord, C. Vader, G. Alliger (1986)
A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: an application of validity generalization proceduresJournal of Applied Psychology, 71
Giles Hirst, D. Knippenberg, Jing Zhou (2009)
A CROSS-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: GOAL ORIENTATION, TEAM LEARNING BEHAVIOR, AND INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITYAcademy of Management Journal, 52
N. Contractor, Leslie DeChurch, Jay Carson, Dorothy Carter, Brian Keegan (2012)
The topology of collective leadershipLeadership Quarterly, 23
A. Eagly, Blair Johnson (1990)
Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-AnalysisPsychological Bulletin, 108
A. Eagly, S. Karau (2002)
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.Psychological review, 109 3
D. Bowers, S. Seashore (1966)
Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of LeadershipAdministrative Science Quarterly, 11
R. House, T. Mitchell (1975)
PATH-GOAL THEORY OF LEADERSHIP, 3
E. Small, J. Rentsch (2010)
Shared leadership in teams: A matter of distribution.Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9
A. Seers, Tiffany Keller, J. Wilkerson (2003)
Can team members share leadership?: Foundations in research and theory
K. Lyness, M. Heilman (2006)
When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 4
Cecilia Ridgeway, E. Boyle, Kathy Kuipers, Dawn Robinson (1998)
How do status beliefs develop ? The role of resources and interactional experience*American Sociological Review, 63
Michelle Ryan, S. Haslam (2007)
The Glass Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding the Appointment of Women to Precarious Leadership PositionsAcademy of Management Review, 32
Michael Ensley, Keith Hmieleski, C. Pearce (2006)
The Importance of Vertical and Shared Leadership within New Venture Top Management Teams: Implications for the Performance of StartupsLeadership Quarterly, 17
Cecilia Ridgeway (2001)
Gender, Status, and LeadershipJournal of Social Issues, 57
C. Pearce, H. Sims (2002)
Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6
Joyce Fletcher (2004)
The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational changeLeadership Quarterly, 15
Peter Gronn (2002)
Distributed leadership as a unit of analysisLeadership Quarterly, 13
V. Schein (2007)
Women in management: reflections and projectionsWomen in Management Review, 22
J. Denis, A. Langley, Viviane Sergi (2012)
Leadership in the PluralThe Academy of Management Annals, 6
L. Crevani, Monica Lindgren, Johann Packendorff (2007)
Shared leadership : A post-heroic perspective on leadership as a collective construction, 3
Jay Carson, Paul Tesluk, J. Marrone (2007)
Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performanceIEEE Engineering Management Review, 44
J. Pastor, Margarita Mayo (2002)
SHARED LEADERSHIP IN WORK TEAMS: A SOCIAL NETWORK APPROACH
K. Klein, P. Bliese, S. Kozlowski, F. Dansereau, M. Gavin, M. Griffin, D. Hofmann, L. James, F. Yammarino, Michelle Bligh (2000)
Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalties, Differences, and Continuing Questions.
R. Bolden (2011)
Distributed Leadership in Organizations: A Review of Theory and ResearchSustainability at Work eJournal
S. Taggar, Rick Hackew, S. Saha (1999)
Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes.Personnel Psychology, 52
A. Eagly, S. Karau (1991)
Gender and the emergence of leaders : a meta-analysisJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60
Joyce Fletcher (1994)
Castrating the Female AdvantageJournal of Management Inquiry, 3
Joyce Fletcher, B. Ragins (2008)
Stone Center Relational Cultural Theory: A Window on Relational Mentoring
C. Pearce, J. Conger (2003)
All Those Years Ago: The Historical Underpinnings of Shared Leadership
A. Erez, Jeffrey LePine, Heather Elms (2002)
EFFECTS OF ROTATED LEADERSHIP AND PEER EVALUATION ON THE FUNCTIONING AND EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF‐MANAGED TEAMS: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENTPersonnel Psychology, 55
N. Hiller, D. Day, R. Vance (2006)
Collective Enactment of Leadership Roles and Team Effectiveness: A Field StudyLeadership Quarterly, 17
K. Benne, Paul Sheats (2010)
Functional Roles of Group MembersJournal of Social Issues, 4
D. Barry (1991)
Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadershipOrganizational Dynamics, 20
L. Calvert, V. Ramsey (1992)
Bringing Women's Voice to Research on Women in ManagementJournal of Management Inquiry, 1
M. Hogue, R. Lord (2007)
A multilevel, complexity theory approach to understanding gender bias in leadership.Leadership Quarterly, 18
A. Filley (1970)
Committee Management: Guidelines from Social Science ResearchCalifornia Management Review, 13
L. Freeman (1978)
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarificationSocial Networks, 1
Michelle Ryan, S. Haslam, M. Hersby, R. Bongiorno (2011)
Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype.The Journal of applied psychology, 96 3
M. Neubert, S. Taggar (2004)
Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergenceLeadership Quarterly, 15
M. Engen, R. Leeden, T. Willemsen (2001)
Gender, context and leadership styles: A field studyJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74
C. Gockel, L. Werth (2010)
Measuring and modeling shared leadership: Traditional approaches and new ideas.Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9
M. Heilman, M. Haynes (2005)
No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams.The Journal of applied psychology, 90 5
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of shared leadership on the gap between male and female leadership influence in groups. Design/methodology/approach – The leadership influence of 231 members from 28 committees was studied using a social networks methodology. Gender differences in committee members’ directive and supportive leadership influence were analyzed through two ANCOVA tests. Findings – Results confirm significant differences between men and women’s leadership influence, as rated by their peers, using directive and supportive leader behaviors. Surprisingly, shared leadership has no significant effect on reducing this gender gap. Research limitations/implications – Results cannot be extrapolated to all other types of groups, since the committees studied have very unique characteristics due to their low typical mutual interaction. Practical implications – Organizations may need to consider complementary strategies in their group leadership design to prevent the emergence of strong gender gaps when leadership is shared. These strategies could involve training members to recognize gender inequalities in leadership status and assigning leadership roles formally to ensure more equal participation in leadership. Originality/value – This paper examines the promise of gender equality in shared leadership and provides empirical data that shows that this promise is not being realized.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.