Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Swaddling, Charles Miller (2002)
Don't measure customer satisfactionQuality Progress, 35
Ruth Bolton, J. Drew (1991)
A Multistage Model of Customers' Assessments of Service Quality and ValueJournal of Consumer Research, 17
Annika Ravald, C. Grönroos (1996)
The value concept and relationship marketingEuropean Journal of Marketing, 30
G. Mcdougall, T. Levesque (2000)
Customer satisfaction with services: putting perceived value into the equationJournal of Services Marketing, 14
R. Srivastava, Tasadduq Shervani, Liam Fahey (1998)
Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 62
Andreas Eggert, Wolfgang Ulaga (2002)
Customer perceived value: a substitute for satisfaction in business markets?Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17
Maruyama G.M.
10.4135/9781483345109
Zeithaml V.A. (1998)
10.1177/002224298805200302Journal of Marketing, 62
Richard McLeon (2002)
Getting to Value, 43
Hayduk L.A.
10.56021/9780801834783
This research aims at creating a model that could explain consumers’ value perception of restaurants attended on Sundays in the city of São Paulo. The research was carried out in two phases. The first was an exploratory research – a focus‐group type with two groups of eight individuals each, whose objective was to discover the main variables that impact the value perception of consumers who attend restaurants on Sundays. Thus, a balanced Likert‐type scale was generated, with seven levels of concurrence. The scale was submitted to five experts for a theoretical validation and was applied to a nonprobabilistic sample pursuant to the judgment of 360 consumers with the same profile as of those of the focus group. Then, in a second phase, validation of the scale by the confirmatory factor analysis method was provided as well as the building and analysis of five causal models by the method of structural equation modeling and the five‐hypotheses test. The final model with a better adjustment (hypothesis 1) was composed of PRICE as an endogenous variable and ENVIRONMENT, SERVICE, FOOD, and HYGIENE as exogenous variables. Such conclusions allow the perception of the decision process in relation to restaurant selection in two phases: (1) when a group of restaurants is chosen, and (2) the moment when the PRICE variable takes over the role of defining the value offered by each restaurant, which will motivate the selection.
Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2007
Keywords: Service; Consumers; Restaurants; Perception; Price
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.