Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sensible operational choices for the climate change agenda

Sensible operational choices for the climate change agenda Purpose – The increasing focus on environmental sustainability and social responsibility within business agendas often leads to expectations that solutions lie in the downscaling, decentralising and deconsolidating of supply chains and logistics systems. This is no more acute than within the climate change agenda, the single biggest environmental challenge to industry today. The purpose of this paper is to challenge these notions and suggest that environmental burden actually decreases across increasing logistical scale and supply chain sophistication. Design/methodology/approach – Primary and secondary life cycle analysis and carbon auditing case evidence detailing and describing operations throughout the food supply chain is used to show what happens to resource efficiency when we chose possible “downscaling” routes. Findings – The paper contends that the principle of economic efficiency leading to environmental efficiency (or “lean is green”) is more generally applicable against our previous expectations and that supply chain sophistication and logistical scale is more likely to lead to environmental benefit rather than cost. Practical implications – From a commercial and industrial point of view, the paper provides evidence to promote conventional supply chain management good practice as a means of driving the demand needed for the technological change required to achieve climate change targets. This is good news for suppliers and distributors, particularly in the light of global economic conditions. From a consumer and policy perspective, the upshot of the paper is a call for more pragmatic thinking and a reminder that critical evidence‐based decision making should be used when judging how best to formulate supply strategies. Originality/value – This paper represents a fresh way of thinking utilising more robust evidence amongst a set of issues that have become precariously muddled and confused. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Logistics Management Emerald Publishing

Sensible operational choices for the climate change agenda

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/sensible-operational-choices-for-the-climate-change-agenda-0oMTlxDA1n

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0957-4093
DOI
10.1108/09574091011089844
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The increasing focus on environmental sustainability and social responsibility within business agendas often leads to expectations that solutions lie in the downscaling, decentralising and deconsolidating of supply chains and logistics systems. This is no more acute than within the climate change agenda, the single biggest environmental challenge to industry today. The purpose of this paper is to challenge these notions and suggest that environmental burden actually decreases across increasing logistical scale and supply chain sophistication. Design/methodology/approach – Primary and secondary life cycle analysis and carbon auditing case evidence detailing and describing operations throughout the food supply chain is used to show what happens to resource efficiency when we chose possible “downscaling” routes. Findings – The paper contends that the principle of economic efficiency leading to environmental efficiency (or “lean is green”) is more generally applicable against our previous expectations and that supply chain sophistication and logistical scale is more likely to lead to environmental benefit rather than cost. Practical implications – From a commercial and industrial point of view, the paper provides evidence to promote conventional supply chain management good practice as a means of driving the demand needed for the technological change required to achieve climate change targets. This is good news for suppliers and distributors, particularly in the light of global economic conditions. From a consumer and policy perspective, the upshot of the paper is a call for more pragmatic thinking and a reminder that critical evidence‐based decision making should be used when judging how best to formulate supply strategies. Originality/value – This paper represents a fresh way of thinking utilising more robust evidence amongst a set of issues that have become precariously muddled and confused.

Journal

The International Journal of Logistics Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 16, 2010

Keywords: Climate change; Resource efficiency; Sustainable supply chains

References

  • The Greatly Growing Garbage Problem
    Alter, H.
  • The environmental impact of changing logistics structures
    Aronsson, H.; Huge‐Brodin, M.
  • Ramsay orders seasonal‐only menu
    BBC
  • Danish consumers' attitudes to the functional and environmental characteristics of food packaging
    Bech‐Larsen, T.
  • Environmentally sustainable food production and marketing: opportunity or hype?
    Bhaskaran, S.; Polonsky, M.; Cary, J.; Fernandez, S.
  • Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Production of Home Made and Industrial Bread in Sweden
    Bimpeh, M.; Djokoto, E.; Doe, H.; Jequier, R.
  • Synergy and coherence through collective action: some insights from wine routes in Tuscany
    Brunori, G.; Rossi, A.
  • PAS 2050‐assessing the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services
    BSI
  • Purchasing and social responsibility: a replication and extension
    Carter, C.R.
  • Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance
    Carter, C.R.
  • Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: a comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches
    Coley, D.; Howard, M.; Winter, M.
  • Localisation of UK food production: an analysis using land area and energy as indicators
    Cowell, S.; Parkinson, S.
  • Guidelines to Defra's GHG conversion factors: annexes
    Defra
  • Should we go ‘home’ to eat? Toward a reflexive politics of localism
    DuPuis, M.; Goodman, D.
  • Are we moving in the right direction?
    EEA
  • Farmers Weekly Interactive – Food Miles Endorsements
    FWI
  • Wise Moves: Exploring the Relationship Between Food, Road Transport and CO 2
    Garnett, T.
  • Quality farm food in Europe: a possible alternative to the industrialised food market and to current agri‐environmental policies: lessons from France
    Gilg, A.; Battershil, M.
  • Transaction cost framework in operations and supply chain management research: theory and measurement
    Grover, V.; Malhotra, M.
  • Green branding effects on attitude: functional versus emotional positioning strategies
    Hartmann, P.; Ibanez, V.A.; Sainz, F.J.
  • Embeddedness and local food systems: notes of two types of direct agricultural market
    Hinrichs, C.
  • Alternative (shorter) food supply chains and specialist livestock products in the Scottish‐English borders
    Ilbery, B.; Maye, D.
  • The industry council for packaging and the environment, FAQS
    INCPEN
  • Why are foods packaged?
    Institute of Food Science & Technology
  • In pursuit of a sustainable supply chain: insights from Westpac Banking Corporation
    Keating, B.; Quazi, A.; Kriz, A.; Coltman, T.
  • Centralised distribution systems and the environment: how increased transport work can decrease the environmental impact of logistics
    Kohn, C.; Huge‐Brodin, M.
  • Drivers for the participation of small and medium‐sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives
    Lee, S.
  • Packaging, Policy, and the Environment
    Levy, G.M.
  • Local Government Association, War on Waste Food Packaging Study
    LGA
  • Fruit and veg boom needed to feed Britain
    McKie, R.
  • The economic and environmental benefits of increasing maximum truck weight: the British experience
    McKinnon, A.C.
  • The balance between commercial farming and the environment in Defra policy
    Miliband, D.
  • The local food sector: a preliminary assessment of its form and impact in Gloucestershire
    Morris, C.; Buller, H.
  • The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies
    Mowery, D.; Rosenberg, N.
  • Localising food supply chains: myths & mires
    Oglethorpe, D.R.; Heron, G.; Slack, R.
  • Investigating the practicalities and benefits of local food production and identifying any unintended effects and trade‐offs
    Oglethorpe, D.R.; Heron, G.; Moxey, A.; Tregear, A.
  • Office for National Statistics: Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 93 Economic Sectors 1990 to 2006
    ONS
  • Farm costs and food miles: an assessment of the full cost of the UK weekly food basket
    Pretty, J.N.; Ball, A.S.; Lang, T.; Morison, J.I.L.
  • Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development
    Renting, H.; Marsden, T.; Banks, J.
  • Distribution of local food activity in England and Wales: an index of food relocalization
    Ricketts Hien, J.; Ilbery, B.; Kneafsey, M.
  • Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative good food networks in South‐West Ireland
    Sage, C.
  • The Economics of Climate Change
    Stern, N.
  • What is a carbon footprint?
    Time for Change
  • Regional foods and rural development: the role of product qualification
    Tregear, A.; Arfini, F.; Belletti, G.; Marescotti, A.
  • World greenhouse gas emissions by sector
    UNEP/GRID
  • In search of the concerned consumer: public perceptions of food, farming and buying local
    Weatherell, C.; Tregear, A.; Allinson, J.
  • Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities
    Williams, A.G.; Audsley, E.; Sandars, D.L.
  • Geographies of food: agro‐food geographies – food, nature, farmers and agency
    Winter, M.