Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Gunningham (2002)
Regulating Small and Medium-Sized EnterprisesJournal of Environmental Law, 14
Jin-hai Li, Alistair Anderson, R. Harrison (2003)
Total quality management principles and practices in ChinaInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20
OECD
Businesses' Views on Red Tape: Administrative and Regulatory Burdens on Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises
S. Harbi, Alistair Anderson (2010)
Institutions and the shaping of different forms of entrepreneurshipJournal of Socio-economics, 39
A. Hansford, J. Hasseldine, Carole Howorth (2003)
Factors Affecting the Costs of UK VAT Compliance for Small and Medium-Sized EnterprisesEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21
Thomas Dean, Robert Brown (1995)
Pollution Regulation as a Barrier to New Firm Entry: Initial Evidence and Implications for Future ResearchAcademy of Management Journal, 38
Guided Insight and ICM‐Research (GI&IR)
The FSB‐ICM ‘voice of small business’ annual survey report of key findings
V. Keter
Small firms: red tape
R. Bennett
Government and small business
Thomas Hopkins (2005)
The Impact of Regulatory Costs on Small Firms
C.W. Crews
Ten Thousand Commandments, an annual snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State
KPMG
Administrative burdens – HMRC measurement project
Purpose – Regulations and complying with regulation are a considerable burden on small firms, which consistently report that regulation is an obstacle to growth. Regulation for small business includes financial and psychological costs and worry about non‐compliance. Accordingly, regulation inflation raises increasing difficulties in understanding and complying with new regulation. Time and resources are diverted from running or growing the business. This paper explores self‐regulation as a mechanism for resolving the problems of regulation. Design/methodology/approach – The authors first sets out the “regulation problem” as seen by the research community and by small business. The analysis explores the issues associated with small business regulation and compliance. They show that “imposed” regulation is expensive and may not be very effective. They continue by examining the nature of self‐regulation and consider a case study: the auto trade. Findings – Self‐regulation can have beneficial effects. All regulation need not be top down control and command and self‐regulation can be effective if done well. Practical implications – Self‐regulation seems to offer a number of advantages over legislation for small businesses, but it appears that a number of conditions need to be met if they are to be seen as effective. The authors discuss the implications and benefits of SFROs as an alternative way of assuring regulatory compliance. Originality/value – Self‐regulation presents an attractive solution to some of the problems encountered by small business regulation through providing a credible, flexible and cost effective alternative to command and control legislation.
Journal of Business Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 5, 2011
Keywords: Small enterprises; Regulation; Regulatory burden; Self regulation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.