Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Ljung, G. Box (1978)
On a measure of lack of fit in time series modelsBiometrika, 65
E. Malecki (1980)
Growth and Change in the Analysis of Rank—Size Distributions: Empirical FindingsEnvironment and Planning A, 12
G. Chamberlain (1979)
Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data
R. Hodrick, E. Prescott (1997)
Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical InvestigationJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29
C. Halaby (2004)
Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into PracticeReview of Sociology, 30
K. Pavitt, M. Robson, J. Townsend (1987)
The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983Journal of Industrial Economics, 35
W. Comanor (1967)
Market Structure, Product Differentiation, and Industrial ResearchQuarterly Journal of Economics, 81
E. Screpanti, S. Zamagni (1994)
An Outline Of The History Of Economic Thought
A. Link (1980)
Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformulation of the Schumpeter HypothesisJournal of Political Economy, 88
Z. Acs, D. Audretsch (1987)
Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm SizeThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 69
A. Dickerson, H. Gibson, E. Tsakalotos (1998)
Business Cycle Correspondence in the European UnionEmpirica, 25
M. Arellano, O. Bover (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
(1987)
Firm Size and R&D Intensity: a Re-Examination
Riccardo Fiorito, Tryphon Kollintzas (1994)
Stylized Facts of Business Cycles in the G7 from a Real Business Cycles PerspectiveEuropean Economic Review, 38
G. Ikenberry (1986)
The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970sInternational Organization, 40
Ruth Judson, Ann Owen (1999)
Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for
F. Scherer (1965)
Size of Firm, Oligopoly, and Research: A CommentThe Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31
Oskar Morgenstern, J. Schumpeter (1940)
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 35
Jochen Streb (1999)
How to Win Schumpeterian Competition: Technological Transfers in the German Plastics Industry from the 1930s to the 1970s
C. Rodríguez (1979)
A Comment on Fisher and Temin on the Schumpeterian HypothesisJournal of Political Economy, 87
F. Scherer (1983)
The propensity to patentInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 1
C. Nelson, Charles Plosser (1982)
Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: Some evidence and implicationsJournal of Monetary Economics, 10
J. Baum, E. Locke, Ken Smith (2001)
A Multidimensional Model of Venture GrowthAcademy of Management Journal, 44
W. Greene (1990)
A Gamma-distributed stochastic frontier modelJournal of Econometrics, 46
M. Artis, Wenda Zhang (2002)
Membership of EMU: A Fuzzy Clustering Analysis of Alternative CriteriaJournal of Economic Integration, 17
Lourdes Montoya, J. Haan (2007)
Regional business cycle synchronization in Europe?International Economics and Economic Policy, 5
P. Aghion, N. Bloom, Richard Blundell, R. Griffith, P. Howitt (2005)
Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U RelationshipQuarterly Journal of Economics, 120
E. Mansfield (2016)
DETERMINANTS, PROSPECTS, AND RELATION TO SIZE OF FIRM AND INVENTIVE OUTPUT'
Jinyoun Kim, Sangjoon Lee, G. Marschke (2009)
Relation of Firm Size to R&D ProductivityResearch Papers in Economics
A. Hashmi, Johannes Biesebroeck, Johannes Biesebroeck (2010)
Market Structure and Innovation: A Dynamic Analysis of the Global Automobile IndustryNational Bureau of Economic Research
K. Im, M. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003)
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panelsJournal of Econometrics, 115
Andrew Levin, C. Lin, C. Chu (2002)
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample propertiesJournal of Econometrics, 108
Z. Griliches (1980)
R&D and the Productivity SlowdownIO: Productivity
Constance Helfat (1997)
Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&DStrategic Management Journal, 18
N. Rosenberg (1983)
Inside the black box
A. Kleinknecht, K. montfort, E. Brouwer (2002)
The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation IndicatorsEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 11
N. Christodoulakis, S. Dimelis, Tryphon Kollintzas (1995)
Comparisons of Business Cycles in the EC: Idiosyncracies and RegularitiesEconomica, 62
Joonwoo Nahm (2001)
Nonparametric quantile regression analysis of R&D-sales relationship for Korean firmsEmpirical Economics, 26
J. Laitner, Dmitriy Stolyarov (2003)
Technological Change and the Stock MarketThe American Economic Review, 93
M. Kamien, N. Schwartz (1976)
On the Degree of Rivalry for Maximum Innovative ActivityQuarterly Journal of Economics, 90
Harald Degner (2011)
Do technological booms matter? New evidence on the relationship between firm size and innovativenessCliometrica, 5
T. Mccraw (2007)
Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction
Manuel Arellano (2009)
Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Groups EstimatorsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49
D. Smythe (2009)
A Schumpeterian view of the Great Merger Movement in American manufacturingCliometrica, 4
G. Maddala, Shaowen Wu (1999)
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple TestOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61
R. Margolis, D. Kammen (1999)
Underinvestment: the energy technology and R&D policy challengeScience, 285 5428
R. Levin, Wesley Cohen, D. Mowery (1985)
R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian HypothesesThe American Economic Review, 75
J. Danthine, J. Donaldson (1991)
Methodological and Empirical Issues in Real Business Cycle Theory
J. Schumpeter, Ursula Backhaus (2017)
The Theory of Economic Development
K. Arrow (1962)
The Economic Implications of Learning by DoingThe Review of Economic Studies, 29
Marios Zachariadis (2003)
R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework Without Scale Effects
A. Link (2013)
Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing: Additional EvidenceThe American Economic Review, 71
Z. Acs, P. Braunerhjelm, D. Audretsch, B. Carlsson (2005)
The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurshipSmall Business Economics, 32
T. Nicholas (2003)
Why Schumpeter was Right: Innovation, Market Power, and Creative Destruction in 1920s AmericaThe Journal of Economic History, 63
Rajeev Dhawan (2001)
Firm size and productivity differential: theory and evidence from a panel of US firmsJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44
M. Kamien, N. Schwartz (1982)
Market structure and innovation
F. Fisher, P. Temin (1973)
Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?Journal of Political Economy, 81
R. Newson (2001)
Review of Generalized Linear Models and Extensions by Hardin and HilbeThe Stata Journal, 1
P. Aghion, J. Tirole (1994)
The Management of InnovationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 109
L. Kilian, Cheolbeom Park (2007)
The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the U.S. Stock MarketCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
D. Levhari, E. Sheshinski (1967)
On the Sensitivity of the Level of Output to Savings: Embodiment and DisembodimentQuarterly Journal of Economics, 81
William Form, T. Burns, G. Stalker (1963)
The Management of Innovation.Administrative Science Quarterly, 8
F. Scherer (1992)
Schumpeter and Plausible CapitalismJournal of Economic Literature, 30
P. Trivedi (1998)
Regression Analysis of Count Data
P. Dasgupta, J. Stiglitz (1980)
Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative ActivityThe Economic Journal, 90
Finn Kydland, E. Prescott (1991)
The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business CyclesStaff Report
P. Aghion, R. Griffith (2005)
Competition and Growth
In Choi (2001)
Unit root tests for panel dataJournal of International Money and Finance, 20
F. Scherer (1967)
Research and Development Resource Allocation Under RivalryQuarterly Journal of Economics, 81
G. Loury (1979)
Market Structure and InnovationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 93
M. Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991)
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment EquationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
Joel Mokyr (1990)
The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress
R. Ericson, A. Pakes (1995)
Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical WorkThe Review of Economic Studies, 62
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate two famous postulates of the Schumpeterian doctrine and its implications for the US economy. Design/methodology/approach – Analytically, the authors investigate whether sector size matters for sectoral: technological change and stability, as expressed through the relevant quantitative measures and variables. To this end, the authors test a number of relevant models that express the various forms of this relationship. More precisely, the authors use panel data for the 14 main sectors of economic activity in the USA over the period 1957-2006, just before the first signs of the US and global recession made their appearance. Findings – The results seem to be in line with the Schumpeterian postulate that market size matters for technological change and economic stability, for the US economy (1957-2006). Clearly, further research would be of great interest. Originality/value – This work contributes to the literature in the following ways: first, it provides an extensive review of the literature on the subject and adopts two relevant methodological approaches. Second, based on these quantitative approaches, the paper offers a complete investigation of two famous postulates of the Schumpeterian theory for the US economy, and it is the first, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to do so by sector of economic activity, in a panel data framework. Third, the paper uses a wide data set (1957-2006) to examine the US economy up until the first signs of the US and global economic recession made their appearance.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 7, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.