Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
School Library Journal, 41
School Library Media Quarterly, 21
Journal of Youth Services in Libraries, 4
A. Curry (2001)
Where Is Judy Blume? Controversial Fiction for Older Children and Young Adults.Journal of Youth Services in Libraries, 14
David McMenemy (2008)
Selection and censorship: librarians and their collectionsLibrary Review, 57
T. Froehlich (2000)
Intellectual Freedom, Ethical Deliberation and Codes of EthicsIFLA Journal, 26
Dianne Hopkins (1991)
Challenges to materials in secondary school library media centersTechTrends, 36
John Harer, S. Harris (1994)
Censorship of Expression in the 1980s: A Statistical Survey
Record in Educational Administration & Supervision, 13
Sandra Hughes-Hassell, Elizabeth Overberg, S. Harris (2013)
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ)-themed literature for teens: Are school libraries providing Adequate collections?, 16
Michael Pope (1974)
Sex and the Undecided Librarian: A Study of Librarians' Opinions on Sexually Oriented Literature
K. Taylor, David McMenemy (2013)
Censorship challenges to books in Scottish public librariesJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45
C. Oppenheim, Victoria Smith (2004)
Censorship in librariesInf. Serv. Use, 24
72 UMKC Law Review, 241
Kimberly Moody (2004)
Censorship by Queensland Public Librarians: Philosophy and PracticeAustralasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 17
G. Marco (1995)
Two false dogmas of censorshipNew Library World, 96
K. Dillon, Claire Williams (1994)
Censorship, Children and School Libraries in Australia: Issues of Concern.Emergency Librarian, 22
Daniel Callison (1991)
A Review of the Research Related to School Library Media Collections: Part II.School Library Media Quarterly, 19
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the most significant censorship issues faced by UK school librarians today and to determine what factors influence attitudes towards these issues.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire was designed, closely based on that used for a previous survey of UK librarians in 2004. It was distributed online and 96 responses were received.FindingsOverall, respondents were more likely to express support for intellectual freedom in theory than in practice. Statements that prompted the strongest pro-censorship responses related to access issues, namely, labelling and filtering. A number of librarians place significant emphasis on their personal ability, or right, to determine whether or not resources are included in the collection. There was evidence of a difference in practical application depending on whether librarians worked with pre-school children or were members of professional associations.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings suggest a need for further research into the role of professional associations in supporting school librarians faced by censorship issues, especially those who support the youngest students.Originality/valueThe findings suggest that while school librarians hold strong pro-intellectual freedom views, they may need additional support to put these into practice. School librarians are undoubtedly in a challenging position, often being solo workers; they need support to find ways to uphold professional intellectual freedom principles within a school setting.
New Library World – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 9, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.