Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/role-of-river-stage-in-characterization-of-phreatic-line-BigxIEHZQF
References (34)
-
E. Park, Hongbin Zhan (2002)
Hydraulics of a finite-diameter horizontal well with wellbore storage and skin effectAdvances in Water Resources, 25
-
M. Panfilov, M. Fourar (2006)
Physical splitting of nonlinear effects in high-velocity stable flow through porous mediaAdvances in Water Resources, 29
-
Bahrampour Hamid, Askari. Bagher, Bahrampour Reza, Bahrampour Mahboubeh (2016)
Review of sustainable energy sources in KermanWorld Journal of Engineering, 13
-
Nazeer Ahmed, D. Sunada (1969)
Nonlinear Flow in Porous MediaJournal of Hydraulic Engineering, 95
-
K.K. Chaturvedi (1980)
Seepage profiles for different porius media and impervious conditions -
N. White, H. Duke, D. Sunada, A. Corey (1970)
Physics of Desaturation in Porous MaterialsJournal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 96
-
S. Westbrook, J. Rayner, G. Davis, T. Clement, P. Bjerg, S. Fisher (2005)
Interaction between shallow groundwater, saline surface water and contaminant discharge at a seasonally and tidally forced estuarine boundaryJournal of Hydrology, 302
-
M. Cardenas (2007)
Potential contribution of topography‐driven regional groundwater flow to fractal stream chemistry: Residence time distribution analysis of Tóth flowGeophysical Research Letters, 34
-
R. Sheets, R. Darner, B. Whitteberry (2002)
Lag times of bank filtration at a well field, Cincinnati, Ohio, USAJournal of Hydrology, 266
-
(1978)
Flow through porous media by finite element method -
V. Zlotnik, Brian Zurbuchen (2003)
Estimation of hydraulic conductivity from borehole flowmeter tests considering head lossesJournal of Hydrology, 281
-
Vikram Kumar, Sumit Sen (2020)
Assessment of Spring Potential for Sustainable Agriculture: A Case Study in Lesser HimalayasApplied Engineering in Agriculture, 36
-
P. Dillon, Megge Miller, H. Fallowfield, J. Hutson (2002)
The potential of riverbank filtration for drinking water supplies in relation to microsystin removal in brackish aquifersJournal of Hydrology, 266
-
D. Lee (1977)
A device for measuring seepage flux in lakes and estuaries1Limnology and Oceanography, 22
-
J. Bardet, T. Tobita (2002)
A practical method for solving free-surface seepage problemsComputers and Geotechnics, 29
-
Chien‐Chieh Chang, chia-shyun Chen (2003)
A flowing partially penetrating well in a finite-thickness aquifer: a mixed-type initial boundary value problemJournal of Hydrology, 271
-
Chongxi Chen, Junwei Wan, Hongbin Zhan (2003)
Theoretical and experimental studies of coupled seepage-pipe flow to a horizontal wellJournal of Hydrology, 281
-
H. Zaradny, R. Feddes (1979)
Calculation of non-steady flow towards a drain in saturated-unsaturated soil by finite elementsAgricultural Water Management, 2
-
J.D. Bredehoeft, S.S. Papadopulos, H.H. Cooper (1982)
Groundwater: the water budget myth -
B. Wett, H. Jarosch, K. Ingerle (2002)
Flood induced infiltration affecting a bank filtrate well at the River Enns, AustriaJournal of Hydrology, 266
-
Henry Darcy
Recherches expérimentales relatives au mouvement de l'eau dans les tuyaux -
M. Bakker, K. Hemker (2004)
Analytic solutions for groundwater whirls in box-shaped, layered anisotropic aquifersAdvances in Water Resources, 27
-
Vikram Kumar, Sumit Sen (2018)
Evaluation of spring discharge dynamics using recession curve analysis: a case study in data-scarce region, Lesser Himalayas, IndiaSustainable Water Resources Management, 4
-
R. Sheetsa, R. Darnera, B. Whitteberryb (2002)
Lag times of bank filtration at a well field , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA -
M. Bruen, Yassin Osman (2004)
Sensitivity of stream–aquifer seepage to spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the aquiferJournal of Hydrology, 293
-
M. Jensen, R. Hanks (1967)
Nonsteady-State Drainage from Porous MediaJournal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, 93
-
Yassin Osman, M. Bruen (2002)
Modelling stream -aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOWJournal of Hydrology, 264
-
S. Westbrooka, J. Raynerb, G. Davisb, T. Clementa, P. Bjergd, S. Fisherb (2004)
Interaction between shallow groundwater , saline surface water and contaminant discharge at a seasonally and tidally forced estuarine boundary -
P. Dillona, M. Millerb, H. Fallowfieldb, J. Hutsonc (2002)
The potential of riverbank filtration for drinking water supplies in relation to microsystin removal in brackish aquifers -
Xunhong Chen (2003)
Analysis of pumping-induced stream - aquifer interactions for gaining streamsJournal of Hydrology, 275
-
A. Shapiro, D. Oki (2000)
Estimating formation properties from early-time oscillatory water levels in a pumped wellJournal of Hydrology, 236
-
E. Anderson (2005)
Modeling groundwater surface water interactions using the Dupuit approximationAdvances in Water Resources, 28
-
(1978)
Sur une nouvelleformulation du probleme de l’ecoulement a travers une digue, SerieAParis, comptes rendus de l’Acad´emie des sciences -
Étienne Juvénal. Études théoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux découverts et à travers les terrains perméables: avec des considérations relatives au régime des grandes eaux, au débouché à leur donner, et à la Marche des alluvions dans les rivières à fond mobile
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- © Emerald Publishing Limited
- ISSN
- 1708-5284
- DOI
- 10.1108/wje-03-2020-0100
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand the basics of interactions of groundwater and surface water, which is needed for effective management of water resources.Design/methodology/approachThe experimental setup was framed using curved flume and the straight flume, which simulates the model of river and groundwater storage, respectively. The model set up further consists, downstream, central and upstream sections where 14 observation wells, which are arranged at a measured distance from the canal side.FindingsExit gradient is higher at downstream when the average head differences between canal and river are 31.9 cm and 35.7 cm. Free seepage height is more in the downstream wells than upstream and central wells. At the downstream section, there is a greater chance of instability of the riverbank.Research limitations/implicationsResults will be used for better planning of hydraulic structural design.Practical implicationsResults will help in storing the large water and better irrigation planning for the water acute states and locations.Originality/valueThe originality is own developed physical model and its own first type to understand the basic of interaction and effects.
Journal
World Journal of Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 28, 2021
Keywords: Groundwater; Energy loss; Phreatic line; Surface water