Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Revealing the hidden facets of normative assessments: improving the management of major infrastructure projects through engaged scholarship

Revealing the hidden facets of normative assessments: improving the management of major... This study focuses on the dynamic relationship between organizational actors and engaged scholars involved in a normative assessment conducted in a public organization managing major projects.Design/methodology/approachWe build on a 15-month engaged scholarship experience carried out in the Ministry of Transport of Quebec. We explain and analyze the normative assessment process, using a storytelling approach and vignettes to explore four situated learning moments.FindingsThis study offers a deeper understanding of how normative assessment is conducted, and how situated and collective learning occur throughout. We find that both organizational actors and researchers learn through this process and synchronize their mutual learning such that researchers actually participate in a larger organizational transformation.Research limitations/implicationsLike any qualitative endeavor, this research is context-specific. We offer several research avenues to extend the applicability of findings.Practical implicationsThis article could inspire organizations and scholars to collaborate on normative assessment during organizational transformation. This approach is of particular interest in the context of a worldwide pandemic where public and private organizations all have to adapt to new sanitary, economic, technological and social realities.Social implicationsIn a context marked by growing concern for the research-practice gap and the relevance of scholarship, our study illustrates the development of a mutually beneficial collaboration between practitioners and researchers that enhances understanding of complex organizational phenomena and issues.Originality/valueThis research highlights the relevance of engaged scholarship and supports normative assessment as a social process to generate mutual learning. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Managing Projects in Business Emerald Publishing

Revealing the hidden facets of normative assessments: improving the management of major infrastructure projects through engaged scholarship

Download PDF
28 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/revealing-the-hidden-facets-of-normative-assessments-improving-the-jNlkAVClZq
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1753-8378
DOI
10.1108/ijmpb-02-2020-0041
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study focuses on the dynamic relationship between organizational actors and engaged scholars involved in a normative assessment conducted in a public organization managing major projects.Design/methodology/approachWe build on a 15-month engaged scholarship experience carried out in the Ministry of Transport of Quebec. We explain and analyze the normative assessment process, using a storytelling approach and vignettes to explore four situated learning moments.FindingsThis study offers a deeper understanding of how normative assessment is conducted, and how situated and collective learning occur throughout. We find that both organizational actors and researchers learn through this process and synchronize their mutual learning such that researchers actually participate in a larger organizational transformation.Research limitations/implicationsLike any qualitative endeavor, this research is context-specific. We offer several research avenues to extend the applicability of findings.Practical implicationsThis article could inspire organizations and scholars to collaborate on normative assessment during organizational transformation. This approach is of particular interest in the context of a worldwide pandemic where public and private organizations all have to adapt to new sanitary, economic, technological and social realities.Social implicationsIn a context marked by growing concern for the research-practice gap and the relevance of scholarship, our study illustrates the development of a mutually beneficial collaboration between practitioners and researchers that enhances understanding of complex organizational phenomena and issues.Originality/valueThis research highlights the relevance of engaged scholarship and supports normative assessment as a social process to generate mutual learning.

Journal

International Journal of Managing Projects in Business – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 21, 2021

Keywords: Action research; Project evaluation; Major infrastructure projects

References

  • Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research
    Alvesson, M.; Sandberg, J.
  • Governance performance in complex environment: the case of a major transformation in a university hospital
    Aubry, M.; Richer, M.-C.; Lavoie-Tremblay, M.
  • Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge
    Barge, J.K.; Shockley-Zalabak, P.
  • Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: a scoping review
    Beaulieu, M.; Breton, M.; Brousselle, A.
  • Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture
    Binder, C.R.; Feola, G.; Steinberger, J.K.
  • Towards a situational understanding of collective learning: a reflexive framework
    Blust, S.D.; Devisch, O.; Schreurs, J.
  • Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework
    Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Jongkind, Y.; Mooi, H.; Bakker, H.; Verbraeck, A.
  • Performance management: a scoping review of the literature and an agenda for future research
    Brown, T.C.; O'Kane, P.; Mazumdar, B.; McCracken, M.
  • Management theory and practice: bridging the gap through multidisciplinary lenses
    Brownlie, D.; Hewer, P.; Wagner, B.; Svensson, G.
  • Improving the management of infrastructure major projects: a dual perspective on organizational and projects assessments
    Brunet, M.; Aubry, M.; Baba, S.; El Boukri, S.; Primeau, M.D.
  • Politics and organizational change: the lived experience
    Buchanan, D.; Badham, R.
  • Revisiting the project management knowledge framework: rebalancing the framework to include transformation projects
    Cha, J.; Newman, M.; Winch, G.
  • Quality in project environments: a non-conventional agenda
    Cicmil, S.
  • A fundamental choice: internal or external evaluation?
    Conley-Tyler, M.
  • L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé - concepts et méthodes
    Contandriopoulos, A.P.; Champagne, F.; Denis, J.L.; Pineault, R.
  • L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé : concepts et méthodes
    Contandriopoulos, A.P.; Champagne, F.; Denis, J.; Avargues, M.
  • Five rules for managing large, complex projects
    Davies, A.; Dodgson, M.; Gann, D.; MacAulay, S.
  • Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement
    de Bruijn, H.
  • Building theories from case study research
    Eisenhardt, K.M.
  • Understanding relations of individual—collective learning in work: a review of research
    Fenwick, T.
  • Reviewing and theorizing the unintended consequences of performance management systems
    Franco‐Santos, M.; Otley, D.
  • Project studies and engaged scholarship: directions towards contextualized and reflexive research on projects
    Geraldi, J.; Söderlund, J.
  • Project studies: what it is, where it is going
    Geraldi, J.; Söderlund, J.
  • Project management in the context of organizational change : the case of the Portuguese public sector
    Gomes, C.F.Y.; Mahmoud, M.; Lisboa, J.V.
  • La recherche-action et ses rapports de coconstruction de savoirs et de formation dans une perspective de professionnalisation entre acteurs praticiens et chercheurs
    Guillemette, S.; Savoie-Zajc, L.
  • Making performance indicators work: the experience of using consensus indicators for external assessment of health and social services at regional level in Spain
    Hilarion, P.; Suñol, R.; Groene, O.; Vallejo, P.; Herrera, E.; Saura, R.M.
  • Bridging the gap between theory and practice in management accounting: reviewing the literature to shape interventions
    Jansen, E.P.
  • Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence
    Jinha, A.E.
  • Preparing useful performance indicators
    Kaufman, R.
  • Collaborate with practitioners: but beware of collaborative research
    Kieser, A.; Leiner, L.
  • The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program
    Kieser, A.; Nicolai, A.; Seidl, D.
  • Collective (team) learning process models: a conceptual review
    Knapp, R.
  • Strategies for theorizing from process data
    Langley, A.
  • Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow
    Langley, A.; Smallman, C.; Tsoukas, H.; Ven, A.H.V.d.
  • Evaluating megaprojects: from the ‘iron triangle’ to network mapping
    Lehtonen, M.
  • Temporal dynamics of situated learning in organizations
    Lervik, J.E.; Fahy, K.M.; Easterby-Smith, M.
  • Ring a ring o'roses: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies
    Macdonald, S.; Kam, J.
  • Islands of practice: conflict and a lack of ‘community’ in situated learning
    Macpherson, A.; Clark, B.
  • If maturity is the answer, then exactly what was the question?
    Mullaly, M.
  • New product development assessment: towards a normative‐contingent audit
    Pannizzolo, R.; Biazzo, S.; Garengo, P.
  • Governing projects under complexity: theory and practice in project management
    Pitsis, T.S.; Sankaran, S.; Gudergan, S.; Clegg, S.R.
  • Participation, value rationality and mutual learning in transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable development
    Polk, M.; Knutsson, P.
  • The theory/practice gap: a problem for research in business schools?
    Reed, M.I.
  • Towards a model of normative diagnosis in the organizational context: the evaluative model of normative appeals
    Salgado, S.; Oceja, L.; Beramendi, M.; González Suhr, C.
  • Front-end definition of projects: ten paradoxes and some reflections regarding project management and project governance
    Samset, K.; Volden, G.H.
  • Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies
    Seidl, D.; Whittington, R.
  • Cultivating situated learning within project management practice
    Sense, A.J.; Badham, R.J.
  • Process studies of project organizing
    Sergi, V.; Crevani, L.; Aubry, M.
  • Cocreating rigorous and relevant knowledge
    Sharma, G.; Bansal, P.T.
  • Understanding process from within: an argument for ‘withness’-thinking
    Shotter, J.
  • Performance indicators and outcome in the public sector
    Smith, P.
  • Leadership skills for managing paradoxes
    Smith, W.K.; Lewis, M.W.
  • Pluralism in project management: navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation
    Söderlund, J.
  • Project management scholarship: relevance, impact and five integrative challenges for business and management schools
    Söderlund, J.; Maylor, H.
  • Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: a ‘small data’ approach
    Stephansen, H.C.; Couldry, N.
  • Trust, reciprocity, and actions: the development of trust in temporary inter-organizational relations
    Swärd, A.
  • Action research – connecting practice and theory
    Ulvik, M.; Riese, H.; Roness, D.
  • Knowledge for theory and practice
    Van De Ven, A.H.; Johnson, P.E.
  • Research paradigms, theoretical pluralism and the practical relevance of management accounting knowledge
    van der Meer‐Kooistra, J.; Vosselman, E.
  • Negotiating reciprocal relationships: practices of engaged scholarship in project studies
    van Marrewijk, A.; Dessing, N.
  • The hierarchy of public project governance frameworks: an empirical study of principles and practices in Norwegian ministries and agencies
    Volden, G.H.; Andersen, B.
  • Directions for future research in project management: the main findings of a UK government funded research network
    Winter, M.; Smith, C.; Morris, P.W.G.; Cicmil, S.