Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Rethinking relationship management Exploring the dimension of trust

Rethinking relationship management Exploring the dimension of trust Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to respond to a call for academia to partner industry by offering new thinking on public relations research and practice. Design/methodology/approach – The paper rethinks relationship management by broadening previous views on the dimensions of relationships. Distrust is proposed as a 12th dimension, adding to Ledingham's 11. It suggests that trust and distrust exist simultaneously within business‐to‐business relationships and that trust and distrust are employed in a coaxial view of relationships within a zone of approval. The paper draws on the work of relationship management theorists and those who identify trust as a key component of relationships. Conceptual considerations are coupled with empirical data collected in a qualitative case study of relationships between the communications team of a blue chip UK utilities company and service provider (SP) organisations. Findings – Analysis supports the broader understanding of trust and distrust operating simultaneously in a zone of approval and may help managers to analyse their business‐to‐business relationships. Research limitations/implications – Findings of qualitative research case studies are not themselves generalisable. This paper uses those findings to develop relationship management theory which may be of interest to practitioners. The findings are also used to generate ideas for further research. Practical implications – An embryonic model is suggested that may provide managers with a tool to use when considering the elements of trust and distrust in relationship management. Originality/value – Contributes to a broader understanding of relationships by suggesting distrust as a 12th dimension in the coaxial view of relationships. Proposes a zone of approval model to enable the exploration of trust and distrust in relationship management. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Communication Management Emerald Publishing

Rethinking relationship management Exploring the dimension of trust

Mary Welch
Journal of Communication Management , Volume 10 (2): 18 – Apr 1, 2006
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/rethinking-relationship-management-exploring-the-dimension-of-trust-9S9INr4Byo
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1363-254X
DOI
10.1108/13632540610664706
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to respond to a call for academia to partner industry by offering new thinking on public relations research and practice. Design/methodology/approach – The paper rethinks relationship management by broadening previous views on the dimensions of relationships. Distrust is proposed as a 12th dimension, adding to Ledingham's 11. It suggests that trust and distrust exist simultaneously within business‐to‐business relationships and that trust and distrust are employed in a coaxial view of relationships within a zone of approval. The paper draws on the work of relationship management theorists and those who identify trust as a key component of relationships. Conceptual considerations are coupled with empirical data collected in a qualitative case study of relationships between the communications team of a blue chip UK utilities company and service provider (SP) organisations. Findings – Analysis supports the broader understanding of trust and distrust operating simultaneously in a zone of approval and may help managers to analyse their business‐to‐business relationships. Research limitations/implications – Findings of qualitative research case studies are not themselves generalisable. This paper uses those findings to develop relationship management theory which may be of interest to practitioners. The findings are also used to generate ideas for further research. Practical implications – An embryonic model is suggested that may provide managers with a tool to use when considering the elements of trust and distrust in relationship management. Originality/value – Contributes to a broader understanding of relationships by suggesting distrust as a 12th dimension in the coaxial view of relationships. Proposes a zone of approval model to enable the exploration of trust and distrust in relationship management.

Journal

Journal of Communication Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 1, 2006

Keywords: Public relations; Trust; Relationship marketing

References

  • Trust and antitrust
    Baier, A.
  • Leaders
    Bennis, W.; Nanus, B.
  • Relationship marketing of services‐growing interest, emerging perspectives
    Berry, L.
  • Trust in business relationships: an evaluation of its status
    Blois, K.
  • Relationship building as a retention strategy: linking relationship attitudes and satisfaction evaluations to behavioural outcomes
    Bruning, S.D.
  • Social Research Methods
    Bryman, A.
  • What future for SERVQUAL?
    Buttle, F.A.
  • Edelman survey reveals falling trust in business
    Cann, R.
  • Is trust a necessary component of relationship management?
    Chia, J.
  • Interpersonal communication and public relations
    Coombs, W.T.
  • The mystery of public relations: unravelling its past, unmasking its future
    Cropp, F.; Pincus, J.
  • Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications
    Daymon, C.; Holloway, I.
  • Manager's Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management
    Dozier, D.M.; Grunig, L.A.; Grunig, J.E.
  • Management Research: An Introduction
    Easterby‐Smith, M.; Thorpe, R.; Lowe, A.
  • Sixth annual Edelman trust barometer
    Edelman
  • Judging others in the shadow of suspicion
    Fein, S.; Hilton, J.L.
  • Trusting the communicators
    FitzPatrick, L.
  • Managing Business Relationships
    Ford, D.; Gadde, L.E.; Håkansson, H.; Snehota, I.
  • Can we trust trust?
    Gambetta, D.
  • Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust and the construction of social reality
    Govier, T.
  • Two‐way symmetrical public relations: past, present, and future
    Grunig, J.E.
  • Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations
    Grunig, J.E.; Hon, L.
  • Understanding Organizations
    Handy, C.
  • Handbook of Public Relations
  • Measuring public relationships among students and administrators at the University of Florida
    Hon, L.; Brunner, B.
  • Organisation‐public relationships: measurement validation in a university setting
    Jo, S.; Hon, L.; Brunner, B.
  • Developing a research framework: inductive vs deductive?
    Kitchen, P.
  • Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives and enduring questions
    Kramer, R.M.
  • Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations
    Ledingham, J.
  • Trust and distrust: new relationships and new realities
    Lewicki, R.J.; MCAllister, D.J.; Bies, R.
  • Qualitative Data Analysis – A Sourcebook of New Methods
    Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.
  • Qualitative Data Analysis – An Expanded Sourcebook
    Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.
  • The commitment‐trust theory of relationship marketing
    Morgan, R.M.; Hunt, S.D.
  • Customer service in business‐to‐business marketing: an agenda for research
    Parasuraman, A.
  • Ethics in public relations, a guide to best practice
    Parsons, P.J.
  • Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders
    Swift, T.
  • Interaction, relationships and networks in business markets: an evolving perspective
    Turnbull, P.; Ford, D.; Cunningham, M.
  • Overview of public relations around the world and principles of modern practice
    Valin, J.
  • An empirical investigation of service client and service provider perceptions of service quality in a business‐to‐business environment
    Welch, M.
  • Rethinking relationship management: exploring the dimension of trust
    Welch, M.
  • Barriers to virtue: exploring the dark side of dyadic relationships
    Welch, M.; Zolkiewski, J.
  • Case Study Research – Design and Methods
    Yin, R.Y.