Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Gillian Metzger (2003)
Privatization as DelegationColumbia Law Review, 103
R. Waterman, K. Meier (1998)
Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8
L. Andersen, T. Jørgensen, A. Kjeldsen, L. Pedersen, K. Vrangbæk (2013)
Public Values and Public Service MotivationThe American Review of Public Administration, 43
R. Battaglio, Christine Ledvinka (2009)
Privatizing Human Resources in the Public SectorReview of Public Personnel Administration, 29
Waldo D.
10.2307/1284717
G. Stoker (1998)
Governance as theory: five propositionsInternational Social Science Journal, 50
Kooiman J. (2003)
10.4135/9781446215012
R. Rhodes (2007)
Understanding Governance: Ten Years OnOrganization Studies, 28
R. Battaglio (2009)
Privatization and Its Challenges for Human Resource Management in the Public SectorReview of Public Personnel Administration, 29
Richard Box (1999)
Running Government Like a BusinessThe American Review of Public Administration, 29
Jody Freeman (2003)
Extending Public Law Norms Through PrivatizationHarvard Law Review, 116
Jerrell Coggburn (2007)
Outsourcing Human ResourcesReview of Public Personnel Administration, 27
David Rosenbloom, S. Piotrowski (2005)
Outsourcing the Constitution and Administrative Law NormsThe American Review of Public Administration, 35
R. Denhardt, Janet Denhardt (2000)
The New Public Service: Serving Rather than SteeringPublic Administration Review, 60
H. Sullivan (1987)
Privatization of Public Services: A Growing Threat to Constitutional RightsPublic Administration Review, 47
A. Reynaers, G. Graaf (2014)
Public Values in Public–Private PartnershipsInternational Journal of Public Administration, 37
R. Moe, R. Gilmour (1995)
Rediscovering Principles of Public Administration: The Neglected Foundation of Public Law.Public Administration Review, 55
R. Rhodes (1996)
The New Governance: Governing without GovernmentPolitical Studies, 44
We argue that the proliferation of governance in the public sector has raised questions regarding individual constitutional rights. While some proclaim cost savings and entrepreneurial solutions to vexing social ills, others suspect that these benefits donʼt outweigh the risk of diminished accountability and the loss of constitutional protection over public service production. We propose a new model to examine the relationships between direct government, governance, public value, and public law value. We apply this model to analyze two landmark Supreme Court cases and one contemporary federal appellate court case to explore the ongoing tension between the governance model and public service production. Our findings suggest that enforcible contract language and public-private entwinement can be used as tools to protect constitutional rights in the face of increasing pressure of governance approaches.
International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.